A novel protocol for three-dimensional structure prediction of RNA-protein complexes

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Huang, Yangyu ^a   Liu, Shiyong ^a   Guo, Dachuan ^a   Li, Lin ^b   Xiao, Yi ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; RNA;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84878654457     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01887     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Jones, S., Daley, D. T., Luscombe, N. M., Berman, H. M. & Thornton, J. M. Protein-RNA interactions: a structural analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 943-54 (2001). (Pubitemid 32162263)
2. Ellis, J. J., Broom, M. & Jones, S. Protein-RNA interactions: structural analysis and functional classes. Proteins 66, 903-11 (2007).
3. Chen, Y., Kortemme, T., Robertson, T., Baker, D. & Varani, G. A new hydrogen-bonding potential for the design of protein-RNA interactions predicts specific contacts and discriminates decoys. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 5147-62 (2004). (Pubitemid 39445502)
4. Zhao, Y. et al. Automated and fast building of three-dimensional RNA structures. Sci Rep 2, 734 (2012).
5. Li, C. H., Cao, L. B., Su, J. G., Yang, Y. X. & Wang, C. X. A new residue-nucleotide propensity potential with structural information considered for discriminating protein-RNA docking decoys. Proteins 80, 14-24 (2012).
6. Tuszynska, I. & Bujnicki, J. M. DARS-RNP and QUASI-RNP: New statistical potentials for protein-RNA docking. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 348 (2011).
7. Katchalski-Katzir, E. et al. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 2195-9 (1992).
8. Vakser, I. A. & Aflalo, C. Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins 20, 320-9 (1994).
9. Gabb, H. A., Jackson, R. M. & Sternberg, M. J. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 272, 106-20 (1997). (Pubitemid 27395541)
10. Chen, R. & Weng, Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 47, 281-94 (2002). (Pubitemid 34438678)
11. Dominguez, C., Boelens, R. & Bonvin, A. M. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 125, 1731-7 (2003). (Pubitemid 36232568)
12. Li, L., Guo, D., Huang, Y., Liu, S. & Xiao, Y. ASPDock: protein-protein docking algorithm using atomic solvation parameters model. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 36 (2011).
13. Jones, S., van Heyningen, P., Berman, H. M. & Thornton, J. M. Protein-DNA interactions: A structural analysis. J Mol Biol 287, 877-96 (1999). (Pubitemid 29188875)
14. Bahadur, R. P., Zacharias, M. & Janin, J. Dissecting protein-RNA recognition sites. Nucleic Acids Res 36, 2705-16 (2008). (Pubitemid 351659584)
15. Perez-Cano, L., Solernou, A., Pons, C. & Fernandez-Recio, J. Structural prediction of protein-RNA interaction by computational docking with propensity-based statistical potentials. Pac Symp Biocomput, 293-301 (2010).
16. Terribilini, M. et al. Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence. RNA 12, 1450-62 (2006). (Pubitemid 44141524)
17. Kim, O. T., Yura, K. & Go, N. Amino acid residue doublet propensity in the protein-RNA interface and its application to RNA interface prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 34, 6450-60 (2006). (Pubitemid 46017942)
18. Kumar, M., Gromiha, M. M. & Raghava, G.P. PredictionofRNA binding sitesin a protein using SVM and PSSM profile. Proteins 71, 189-94 (2008). (Pubitemid 351358602)
19. Perez-Cano, L. & Fernandez-Recio, J. Optimal protein-RNA area, OPRA: a propensity-based method to identify RNA-binding sites on proteins. Proteins 78, 25-35 (2010).
20. Allers, J. & Shamoo, Y. Structure-based analysis of protein-RNA interactions using the program ENTANGLE. J Mol Biol 311, 75-86 (2001). (Pubitemid 32735315)
21. Iwakiri, J., Tateishi, H., Chakraborty, A., Patil, P. & Kenmochi, N. Dissecting the protein-RNA interface: the role of protein surface shapes and RNA secondary structures in protein-RNA recognition. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 3299-306 (2012).
22. Gupta, A. & Gribskov, M. The role of RNA sequence and structure in RNA-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 409, 574-87 (2011).
23. Perez-Cano, L., Jimenez-Garcia, B. & Fernandez-Recio, J. Aprotein-RNA docking benchmark (II): extended set from experimental and homology modeling data. Proteins 80, 1872-82 (2012).
24. Huang, S. Y. & Zou, X. A nonredundant structure dataset for benchmarking protein-RNA computational docking. J Comput Chem 34, 311-318 (2013).
25. Case, D. A. et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26, 1668-88 (2005). (Pubitemid 43076180)
26. Liu, S. & Vakser, I. A. DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarsegrained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 280 (2011).
27. Shen, J. et al. Predicting protein-protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 4337-41 (2007). (Pubitemid 47186227)
28. Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-637 (1983).
29. Lu, X. J. & Olson, W.K.3DNA: asoftware packagefor the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 5108-21 (2003). (Pubitemid 37441878)
30. Berman, H., Henrick, K. & Nakamura, H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat Struct Biol 10, 980 (2003). (Pubitemid 37500485)
31. Hwang, H., Pierce, B., Mintseris, J., Janin, J. & Weng, Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 73, 705-9 (2008). (Pubitemid 352788651)