Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-15

Anesthesiology

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1332-1340

  Stark, Peter A ^a   Myles, Paul S ^b   Burke, Justin A ^a  

^a ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EFFECT SIZE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF RECOVERY SCORE 15; RECOVERY ROOM; SPLIT HALF CORRELATION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878639856     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lee A, Lum ME: Measuring anaesthetic outcomes. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24:685-93
2. Donabedian A: The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260:1743-8
3. Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM: Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: Results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:6-10
4. Swan BA, Maislin G, Traber KB: Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:739-45
5. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL: Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:83-90
6. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S: Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:11-5
7. Hogue SL, Reese PR, Colopy M, Fleisher LA, Tuman KJ, Twersky RS, Warner DS, Jamerson B: Assessing a tool to measure patient functional ability after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:97-106
8. Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ: Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: The post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiolo gy 2010; 113:892-905
9. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S: Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiolo gy 2001; 95:862-7
10. Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F: A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:63-9
11. Gower ST, Quigg CA, Hunt JO, Wallace SK, Myles PS: A comparison of patient self-administered and investigatoradministered measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34:634-8
12. Kirshner B, Guyatt G: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38:27-36
13. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34:220-33
14. McDowell I, Newell C: Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
15. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF: Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27:S178-89
16. Cronbach L: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 1951; 16:287-34
17. Morton AP, Dobson AJ: Assessing agreement. Med J Aust 1989; 150:384-7
18. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-10
19. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60:34-42
20. Archie JP: Mathematical coupling of data: A common source of error. Ann Surg 1981; 193:296-303
21. Buchanan FF, Myles PS, Cicuttini F: Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106:832-9
22. Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB: Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer 1990; 65:186-92
23. Hall JA, Dornan MC: Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: A metaanalysis. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30:811-8
24. Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL: The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Qual Life Res 2007; 16:815-22
25. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR: Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2:1-74