Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Abdolell, Mohamed ^a,b   Tsuruda, Kaitlyn ^b   Schaller, Gerry ^a,b   Caines, Judy ^a,b,c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Capital District Health Authority   (Canada)

^c Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICES; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; MAMMOGRAPHIC BREAST DENSITIES; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; MEASUREMENT ALGORITHMS; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENSITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGY; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMARY GLAND; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84878626686     PISSN: 1748670X     EISSN: 17486718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/651091     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boyd N. F., Guo H., Martin L. J., Sun L., Stone J., Fishell E., Jong R. A., Hislop G., Chiarelli A., Minkin S., Yaffe M. J., Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2007 356 3 227 236 2-s2.0-33846407655 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 (Pubitemid 46143226)
2. Brisson J., Diorio C., Mâsse B., Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 2003 12 8 728 732 2-s2.0-0042527260 (Pubitemid 36993162)
3. McCormack V. A., dos Santos Silva I., Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 2006 15 6 1159 1169 2-s2.0-33745683831 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
4. Wolfe J. N., Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 1976 37 5 2486 2492 2-s2.0-0017082939
5. Gram I. T., Funkhouser E., Tabár L., The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. European Journal of Radiology 1997 24 2 131 136 2-s2.0-0031060766 10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01138-2 (Pubitemid 27165353)
6. Boyd N. F., Jensen H. M., Cooke G., Han H. L., Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1992 84 15 1170 1179 2-s2.0-0026702197
7. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BIRADS) 1993 Reston, Va, USA American College of Radiology
8. Garrido-Estepa M., Ruiz-Perales F., Miranda J., Ascunce N., González-Román I., Sánchez-Contador C., Santamariña C., Moreo P., Vidal C., Peris M., Moreno M. P., Váquez-Carrete J. A., Collado-García F., Casanova F., Ederra M., Salas D., Pollán M., DDM-Spain, Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales. BMC cancer 2010 10 supplement 485 2-s2.0-79952196754
9. American College of Radiology, ACR Statement on Reporting Breast Density in Mammography Reports and Patient Summaries. 2012, http://www.acr.org/About-Us/ Media-Center/Position-Statements
10. Boyd N. F., Byng J. W., Jong R. A., Fishell E. K., Little L. E., Miller A. B., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L., Yaffe M. J., Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995 87 9 670 675 2-s2.0-0028939039
11. Boyd N., Martin L., Gunasekara A., Melnichouk O., Maudsley G., Peressotti C., Yaffe M., Minkin S., Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 2009 18 6 1754 1762 2-s2.0-67449085957 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107
12. FDA, MQSA National Statistics. 2013, http://www.fda.gov/Radiation- EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ ucm113858.htm
13. Alonzo-Proulx O., Packard N., Boone J. M., Al-Mayah A., Brock K. K., Shen S. Z., Yaffe M. J., Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2010 55 11 3027 3044 2-s2.0-77952391417 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/003
14. Yaffe M. J., Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10 3, article 209 2-s2.0-55749094194 10.1186/bcr2102
15. Kontos D., Bakic P. R., Acciavatti R. J., Conant E. F., Maidment A. D. A., A comparative study of volumetric and area-based breast density estimation in digital mammography: results from a screening population. Digital Mammography 2010 6136 378 385 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5- 51
16. Ding J., Warren R., Warsi I., Day N., Thompson D., Brady M., Tromans C., Highnam R., Easton D., Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 2008 17 5 1074 1081 2-s2.0-52649131427 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2634
17. Highnam R., Brady S., Yaffe M., Karssemeijer N., Harvey J., Robust breast composition measurement-volpara TM. 6136 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Mammography (IWDM '10) 2010 342 349 Lecture Notes in Computer Science
18. Bland J. M., Altman D. G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2-s2.0-0022624332 (Pubitemid 16134762)
19. Hunt R. J., Percent agreement, Pearson's correlation, and kappa as measures of inter-examiner reliability. Journal of Dental Research 1986 65 2 128 130 2-s2.0-0022671625
20. Stone J., Ding J., Warren R. M. L., Duffy S. W., Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2010 124 2 551 554 2-s2.0-78649335611 10.1007/s10549-010-0976-y
21. American College of Radiology, National mammography database data elements. version 2.0, 2009, https://nrdr.acr.org/Portal/HELP/NMD/nmd-data- elements.pdf
22. Kapur J. N., Sahoo P. K., Wong A. K. C., A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing 1985 29 3 273 285 2-s2.0-0022266928 (Pubitemid 15510905)
23. Tsai W. H., Moment-preserving thresholding: a new approach. Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing 1985 29 3 377 393 2-s2.0-0022266946
24. Fleiss J. L., Cohen J., The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1973 33 613 619
25. Landis J. R., Koch G. G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977 33 1 159 174 2-s2.0-0017360990 (Pubitemid 8054849)
26. Harvey J. A., Bovbjerg V. E., Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004 230 1 29 41 2-s2.0-0346218106 10.1148/radiol.2301020870 (Pubitemid 37549780)
27. Bland J. M., Altman D. G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2-s2.0-0022624332 (Pubitemid 16134762)