Effects of execution duration on within-item strategy switching in young and older adults

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 464-472

  Ardiale, Eléonore ^a   Lemaire, Patrick ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Ageing; Arithmetic; Strategy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; MENTAL ARITHMETIC; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; TASK PERFORMANCE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGING; COGNITION; EXECUTION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84878618492     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.789854     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ardiale, E., &, Lemaire, P. 2012. Within-item strategy switching: An age comparative study in adults, Psychology and Aging, 27, 1138-1151.
2. Campbell, J. I. D. 2005. Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3. Campbell, J. I. D., and, Austin, A. 2002. Effects of response time deadlines on adults' strategy choices for simple addition. Memory and Cognition, 30: 988-994. doi: 10.3758/BF03195782 (Pubitemid 35303483)
4. Deltour, J. J. 1993. Echelle de vocabulaire de Mill Hill de J. C. Raven. Adaptation française et normes européennes du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices de Raven (PM38). Braine-le-Château, France: Editions l'application des techniques modernes.
5. Dunlosky, J., and, Kane, M. J. 2007. The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy-assessment methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60: 1227-124. doi: 10.1080/17470210600926075
6. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and, McHugh, P. R. 1975. "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12: 189-198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
7. French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., &, Price, I. A. 1963. Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Fristoe, N. M., Salthouse, T. A., and, Woodart, J. L. 1997. Examination of age-related deficits on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychology, 48: 148-153.
9. Hodzik, S., and, Lemaire, P. 2011. Inhibition and shifting capacities mediate adults' age-related differences in strategy selection and repertoire. Acta Psychologica, 137: 335-344. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.002
10. Imbo, I., and, Vandierendonck, A. 2007. The development of strategy use in elementary school children: Working memory and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96: 284-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006. 09.001
11. Kail, M., Lemaire, P., and, Lecacheur, M. 2012. Online grammaticality judgments in French young and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 38: 186-207. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.660031
12. LeFevre, J. A., Greenham, S. L., and, Waheed, N. 1993. The development of procedural and conceptual knowledge in computational estimation. Cognition and Instruction, 11: 95-132. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1102-1
13. Lemaire, P. 2010. Variations stratégiques et vieillissement. Revue de neuropsychologie, neurosciences cognitives et cliniques, 2: 124-132. doi: 10.3917/rne.022.0124
14. Lemaire, P., and, Arnaud, L. 2008. Young and older adults' strategies in complex arithmetic. American Journal of Psychology, 121 (1): 1-16.
15. Lemaire, P., Arnaud, L., and, Lecacheur, M. 2004. Adults' age-related differences in adaptativity of strategy choices: Evidence from computational estimation. Psychology and Aging, 19: 467-481. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.467 (Pubitemid 39129543)
16. Lemaire, P., and, Lecacheur, M. 2002. Applying the choice/no-choice methodology: The case of children's strategy use in spelling. Developmental Science, 5: 43-48. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00207
17. Lemaire, P., and, Lecacheur, M. 2010. Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 38: 322-332. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.322
18. Lemaire, P., and, Reder, L. 1999. What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? An example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory and Cognition, 22: 364-382. (Pubitemid 29190653)
19. Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., and, Rieskamp, J. 2007. The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22: 796-810. (Pubitemid 351173590)
20. Raven, J. C. 1951. Guide to using progressive matrices (1947), Sets A, Ab, B. London: Lewis.
21. Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., and, Shalden, M. N. 2009. Changes of mind decision-making. Nature, 461: 263-267. doi: 10.1038/nature08275
22. Salthouse, T. A. 1996. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103: 403-428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403 (Pubitemid 126432206)
23. Salthouse, T. A., Toth, J., Daniels, K., Parks, C., Pak, R., Wolbrette, M., and, Hocking, K. J. 2000. Effects of aging on efficiency of task switching in a variant of the Trail Making Test. Neuropsychology, 14: 102-111. (Pubitemid 30075432)
24. Schneider, D. W., &, Anderson, J. R. 2010. Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1873-1894.
25. Siegler, R. S. 2007. Cognitive variability. Developmental Science, 10: 104-109.
26. Taconnat, L., Clarys, D., Vanneste, S., Bouazzaoui, B., and, Isingrini, M. 2006. Aging and implementation of encoding strategies in the generation of rhymes: The role of executive functions. Neuropsychology, 20: 658-665. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.658 (Pubitemid 44747864)
27. Trbovich, P. L., and, LeFevre, J. A. 2003. Phonological and visual working memory in mental addition. Memory and Cognition, 31: 738-745. doi: 10.3758/BF03196112 (Pubitemid 36999410)
28. Uittenhove, K., and, Lemaire, P. 2012. Sequential difficulty effects during strategy execution: A study in arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 59: 295-301. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000157
29. Van der Elst, W., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., Van Breukelen, G. J. P., and, Jolles, J. 2006. The Stroop Color-Word Test: Influence of age, sex, and education; and normative data for a large sample across the adult age range. Assessment, 13: 62-79. (Pubitemid 43812615)
30. Zbordoff, J., &, Logan, G. 2005. What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell., Handbook of mathematical cognition 331-345. New York: Psychology Press.