The role of stakeholder engagement in the development of sustainable rail infrastructure systems

Research in Transportation Business and Management

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages 106-113

  Rangarajan, Kiran ^a   Long, Suzanna ^a   Tobias, Alan ^b   Keister, Marie ^c  

^a Missouri University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b HNTB CORPORATION   (United States)

^c Engage Public Affairs LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Livable communities; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable rail infrastructure planning; Transportation planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878614769     PISSN: 22105395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amos P. Rail freight in development. Department of Internal Development 2009, Transport Research Support, Washington D.C.
2. Brown M. Technology diffusion and the "knowledge barrier": The dilemma of stakeholder participation. Public Performance & Management Review 2003, 26(4):345-359.
3. Creswell J.W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches 2003, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
4. Elias A., Cavana R., Jackson L. Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management 2002, 32(4):301-310.
5. Deakin E. Sustainable development and sustainable transportation: Strategies for economic prosperity, environmental quality, and equity. Working 2001-2003 2001.
6. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2005, Sage Publications, London.
7. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach 1984, Pitman, Boston, MA, USA.
8. Goldman T., Gorham R. Sustainable urban transportation: Four innovative directions. Technology in Society 2006, 28:261-273.
9. Long Suzanna, Gentry Lance, Bham Ghulam Driver Perceptions and the impact of change resistance on the implementation of variable speed limit systems. Transport Policy 2012, 23:1-7.
10. Newman L. Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2005, 1(2):25-31.
11. Murakami J., Cervero R. California high-speed rail and economic development: Station-area market profiles and public policy responses. University of California Transportation Center, The Center for Environmental Public Policy 2010, University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA.
12. Ottens M., Franssen M., Kroes P., Van De Poel I. Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure 2006, 2(2-3):133-145.
13. Rangarajan K., Long S., Ziemer N., Lewis N. An evaluative economic development typology for sustainable rural economic development. Community Development 2012, 1-13. 10.1080/15575330.2011.651728.
14. Steg L., Gifford R. Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography 2005, 13:59-69.
15. Tuominen A., Ahlqvist T. Is the transport system becoming ubiquitous? Socio-technical roadmapping as a tool for integrating the development of transport policies and intelligent transport systems and services in Finland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2010, 77:120-134.
16. Williams R., Edge D. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 1996, 25:856-899.