Detecting changes in key and range for the automatic modelling and coding of intonation

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 135-138

  De Looze, Céline ^a   Hirst, Daniel ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC CORRELATES; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES; PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 84878594172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Arons, B. 1994. Pitch-based Emphasis Detection for Segmenting Speech Recordings, dans Proceedings of international Conference on Spoken Language Processing (September 18-22 Yokohama, Japan), vol. 4, 1931-1934
2. Auran, C., Bouzon, C. & Hirst, DJ. 2004. The AIXMARSEC Project: an evolutive database of spoken British English in Speech Prosody, March 23-26, Nara, Japan, 561-564.
3. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2007. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6.35) [Computer program]. Downloadable from http://www.praat.org/.
4. Bolinger, D. 1951. Intonation: levels versus configurations. Word Vol 7 N 3 Part1, 199-211.
5. Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. 1980. Discourse Intonational and language Teaching: Longman 1-82
6. Clark, RAJ. 1999. Using prosodic structure to improve pitch range variation in text to speech synthesis in ICPhS99
7. Gussenhoven, C. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. De Looze, C. In progress. Analyse et interprétation de l'empan temporel des variations prosodiques en français et en anglais contemporain. Doctoral thesis, Université de Provence.
9. Dilley, LC. 2007. Pitch range variation in english tonal contrasts: continuous or categorical? in ICPHs XVI. Saarbrücken, 6-10 August 2007. 1153-6
10. Durand, J.; Laks, B.; & Lyche, C. 2002. La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. In: C. Pusch & W. Raible (eds.) Romanistische Korpuslinguistik- Korpora und gesprochene Sprache/Romance Corpus Linguistics - Corpora and Spoken Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 93-106. http://www.projet-pfc.net/.
11. Hirst, D.J. 1998. Intonation in British English in Hirst & Di Cristo (eds) 1998.
12. Hirst & Di Cristo (eds) 1998. Intonation Systems. A survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Hirst, D.J. & Di Cristo, A. 1998. A survey of intonation systems. in Hirst & Di Cristo (eds) 1998.
14. Hirst, D.J., Di Cristo, A. & Espesser, R. 2000. Levels of representation and levels of analysis for intonation. in M. Horne (ed) Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 51-87.
15. Hirst, D.J. 2005. Form and function in the representation of speech prosody. Speech Communication 46 (3-4), 334-347.
16. Hirst, D.J. 2007. A Praat plugin for Momel and INTSINT with improved algorithms for modelling and coding intonation. in Proceedings International Conference on Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, paper 1443.
17. Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2006. Prosodic Typology and Transcription: A Unified Approach. Oxford University Press.
18. Knowles, G. 1996. Working with Speech: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
19. Ladd, DR & Terken, J.1995. Modelling intra-and interspeaker pitch range in Proceedings ICPhS 95: Stockholm Vol 2, 386-9
20. Ladd, D.R. 1997. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Liberman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J 1984 Intonational under Changes in Pitch Range and Length in Language Sound Stucture edited by M Aronoff and RT Oehrle: MIT Press, 157-232
22. Miller, J., Grosjean, F., Lomanto, C. 1984. Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: A reanalysis and some applications. Phonetica, 41. 215-225.
23. Nicolas, P & Hirst, D.J. 1995. Symbolic coding of higher-level characteristics of fundamental frequency curves in ESCA Eurospeech'95. 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. Madrid, September 1995. ISSN 1018-4074
24. Patterson, D & Ladd, R.1999. Pitch Range Modelling: Linguistic dimensions of variation in ICPHS99. 1169-72.
25. Patterson, D.2000. A linguistic approcha to pitch range modelling: Doctoral thesis.
26. Pierrehumbert, JB. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Doctoral thesis, MIT Cambridge MA.
27. Shriberg, E., Ladd, DR., Terken, J. & Stockle, A. 1996. Modelling pitch range variation within and across speakers: predicting F0 targets when "speaking up" in ICSLP96.
28. Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. 1992. ToBI: a Standard for Labelling English Prosody. Proceedings ICSLP92 (2) 867-870, Banff, Canada.
29. Trager, G.L. & Smith, H.L. 1951. An Outline of English Structure (Battenburg Press; Norman, Oklahoma).
30. Xu, Y., Xu, C. & Sun, X. 2004. On the Temporal Domain of Focus in Speech Prosody 2004. 81-84.