Technical innovation in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: An MR angiographic sequence using a sparse k-space sampling strategy

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 993-1000

  Fayad, Laura M ^a   Mugera, Charles ^a   Soldatos, Theodoros ^a,b   Flammang, Aaron ^c   Del Grande, Filippo ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; MR angiography; Musculoskeletal; Sarcoma; Tumor

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CASE REPORT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RESPONSE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OSTEOSARCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BONE NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE NEOPLASMS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SARCOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878578763     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1604-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, van Coevorden F, Zwinderman AH, et al. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology. 2004;233(2):493-502.
2. Shapeero LG, Vanel D, Verstraete KL, Bloem JL. Fast magnetic resonance imaging with contrast for soft tissue sarcoma viability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:212-27.
3. Toms AP, White LM, Kandel R, Bleakney RR, Noseworthy M, Lee S, et al. Limitations of single slice dynamic contrast enhanced MR in pharmacokinetic modeling of bone sarcomas. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(5):512-20.
4. Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional and metabolic techniques. Radiology. 2012;265:340-56.
5. Seng K, Maderwald S, de Greiff A, Quick HH, Laub G, Schmitt P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vessels: an intraindividual comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies. Investig Radiol. 2010;45(11):708-14.
6. Hegyi M, Semsei AF, Jakab Z, et al. Good prognosis of localized osteosarcoma in young patients treated with limb-salvage surgery and chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57(3):415-22.
7. Donahue TR, Kattan MW, Nelson SD, Tap WD, Eilber FR, Eilber FC. Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy and histopathologic response in primary, high-grade retroperitoneal sarcomas using the sarcoma nomogram. Cancer. 2010;116(16):3883-91.
8. Van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Peterse JL, van Coevorden F, Taminiau AH, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in monitoring response to isolated limb perfusion in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(8):1849-58.
9. Zaitsev M, D'Arcy J, Collins DJ, Leach MO, Zilles K, Shah NJ. Dual-contrast echo planar imaging with keyhole: application to dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion studies. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(19):4491-505.
10. Parrish T, Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33(3):326-36.
11. Webb AG, Liang ZP, Magin RL, Lauterbur PC. Applications of reduced-encoding MR imaging with generalized-series reconstruction (RIGR). J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3(6):925-8.