Tolerable and inclusive learning spaces: An evaluation of policies and specifications for physical environments that promote inclusion in Turkish Primary Schools

International Journal of Inclusive Education

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 462-479

  Erkilic, Mualla ^a   Durak, Selen ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

inclusive education; inclusive learning spaces; universal design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878576102     PISSN: 13603116     EISSN: 14645173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2012.685333     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ainscow, M. 1997. Inclusive education a framework for change: National and international perspectives. Bristol, UK: Center for Studies in Inclusive Education.
2. Ainscow, M. 2002. Understanding the development of inclusive schools. Falmer Press, Taylor and Francis Group (Electronic Source: Ebrary Database).
3. Ainscow, M. 2003. Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change in inclusive education: A framework for reform. In Proceedings of the international conference on inclusive education, 1-16, December 16-19, 2003. www.ied.edu.hk/csnsie/view.php?secid (accessed January 2011).
4. Ainscow, M., T. Booth, and A. Dyson. 2004. Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative research network. International Journal of Inclusive Education 8, no. 2: 125-39.
5. Council of Europe (COE). 2009. Achieving full participation through universal design. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe.
6. Council of Europe (COE) Resolution ResAP. 2001. The principles of UD into the curricula of all occupants working on built environment. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=186495 (accessed April 2012).
7. Council of Europe (COE) Resolution ResAP. 2007. Achieving full participation through UD. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1226267 (accessed June 2010).
8. Daniel, H. 2009. Vygotsky and inclusion. In Psychology for education, ed. P. Hick, R. Kershner and P.T. Farrel, 24-37. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
9. Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
10. Durak, S. 2010. Searching for a common framework for education and architecture through reconsideration of universal design principles for promoting inclusive education in primary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 128.
11. Dyson, A., and A. Howes. 2009. Towards an interdisciplinary agenda for inclusive education. In Psychology for inclusive education: New directions in theory and practice, ed. P. Hick, R. Kershner and P.T. Farrell, 153-64. London and New York: Routledge.
12. Erkilic, M. 2011. Conceptual challenges between universal design and disability in relation to the body, impairment, and the environment. METU, Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 28, no. 2: 181-203.
13. Fisher, K. 2005. Linking pedagogy and space. Victoria: Department of Education and Training. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/assetman/ bf/Linking-Pedagogy-and-Space.pdf (accessed September 2011).
14. Frederickson, N., and T. Cline. 2009. Special educational needs, inclusion and diversity. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
15. Freire, P. 1978. Pedagogy in process. http://education.stateuniversity. com/pages/1998/Freire-Paulo-1921-1997.html (accessed January 2012).
16. Gargiulo, R.M., and D. Metcalf. 2010. Teaching in today's inclusive classrooms: A universal design for learning approach. International Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
17. Gillies, M.R., and S. Carrington. 2004. Inclusion: Culture, policy and practice: A Queensland perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 24, no. 2: 117-28.
18. Hershberger, R.G. 1999. Architectural programming and predesign manager. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Hick, P. 2009. Reframing psychology for inclusive learning within social justice agendas. In Psychology for inclusive education new directions in theory and practice, ed. P. Hick, R. Kershner and P.T. Farrell, 165-76. London and New York: Routledge.
20. Hick, P., R. Kershner, and P.T. Farrell, eds. 2009. Introduction Psychology for inclusive education: New directions in theory and practice, 1-10. London and New York: Routledge.
21. Howe, K.R. 1997. What (epistemic) benefit inclusion. In Philosophy of education yearbook, ed. S. Laird. Philosophy of Education Society. http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PESYearbook/97-docs/howe.html (accessed June 2010).
22. Imrie, R., and P. Hall. 2001. Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. London and New York: Spon Press.
23. Kilby, R.J. 2004. Critical thinking, epistemic virtue, and significance of inclusion: Reflection on Harvey Siegel's theory of rationality. Educational Theory 54, no. 3: 299-313. University of Illinois: Board of Trustees, doi: 10.111/j.0013-2004.200400021.x.
24. Kuester, V.M. 2003. Inclusion: A philosophical ideal? In A framework for reform. Proceedings of the international conference on inclusive education, 75-83, December 16-19, 2003. www.ied.edu.hk/csnsie/view.php?secid (accessed January 2011).
25. Kugelmass, J.W. 2004. The inclusive school: Sustaining equity and standards. London: Teachers College Press.
26. Leicester, M. 2008. Creating an inclusive school: Ideas in action. London: Continuum.
27. Loreman, T., J. Deppeler, and D. Harvey. 2005. Inclusive education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
28. Luck, R. 2001. Project briefing for accessible design. Design Studies 22, no. 3: 523-35.
29. Luck, R., H. Haenlein, and K.M. Bright. 2001. Project briefing for an inclusive universal design process. In Universal design handbook, ed. W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, 44.1-45.1. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Mace,R.L. 1998.Aperspective on universal design. InApresentation atDesigning for 21st century: An international conference on universal design, June 1998. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University. http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/ design/sod5/cud/about-us/usronmacespeech. htm (accessed April 2011).
31. Mallory-Hill, S., and B. Everton. 2001. Accessibility standards and universal design developments in Canada. In Universal design handbook, ed. W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, 15.1-17.1. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Margolin, V. 1997. Getting to know the user. Design Studies 18, no. 3: 227-36.
33. M.E.B. 1997. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education Regulations on Special Education Services, Decree Law 573 on Special Education (accessed May 2010).
34. M.E.B. 2001. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Guidance and psychological counselling services regulation. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/ html/68.html (accessed April 2012).
35. M.E.B. 2008. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Special Education Guidance and Counselling Services, Educational Practices through Inclusion CircularNr:2008/60. http://www.ozida.gov.tr/ yenimevzuat/5-10.htm (accessed May 2010).
36. Miles, S. 2000. Enabling inclusive education: Challenges and dilemmas. Paper presented at a symposium on development policy entitled 'Children with disabilities and the convention on the rights of a child', Gustav Stresemann Institute, Bonn, Germany, October 27-29. http://www.eenet.org.uk/resources/docs/ bonn-2.php (accessed April 2012).
37. Ostroff, E. 2001. Universal design: The new paradigm. In Universal design handbook, ed. W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, 1.1-1.12. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Ostroff, E. 2010. Universal design: An evolving paradigm. http://www.mhprofessional.com/downloads/products/0071629238/0071629238.pdf (accessed March 2011).
39. Rieser, R. 2008. Implementing inclusive education. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
40. Rose, D.H., and A. Mayer. 2006. A practical reader in UDL. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Russel, M.K., and P.W. Airasain. 2012. Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Sandhu, J.S. 2001. An integrated approach to universal design: Toward the inclusion of all ages, cultures, and diversity. In Universal design handbook, ed. W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, 3.3-3.13. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.
44. Shakespeare, T. 2010. The social model of disability. In The disability studies reader, ed. J.D. Lennard, 266-73. London and New York: Routledge.
45. Siegel, H. 1995. What price inclusion?, In Philosophy of education yearbook, ed. A. Neiman, 89-96. Urbana III: Philosophy of Education Society.
46. Simmons, B., T. Blackmore, and P. Bayliss. 2008. Postmodern synergetic knowledge creation: Extending the boundaries of disability studies. Disability and Society 23, no. 7: 733-45.
47. Skrtic, T.S. 1991. Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and social organisation. Denver, CO: Love Publication.
48. Slee, R. 2001. Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: The case of inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education 5, nos. 2-3: 167-77.
49. Slee, R. 2003. Inclusive education: A framework for reform. In A framework for reform. Proceedings of the international conference on inclusive education, December 16-19, 2003. www.ied.edu.hk/csnsie/view.php?secid (accessed January 2011).
50. Steinfeld, E. 1994. The concept of universal design. Paper presented at the Sixth Ibero-American Conference on Accessibility. Rio de Janeiro: Center for Independent Living. http://www. udeworld.com/dissemination/publications/56- reprints-short-articles-and-papers/110-theconcept-of-universal-design.html (accessed April 2012).
51. Steinfeld, E. 2010. Universal design. International Encyclopaedia of Rehabilitation, 2008-2011 by the Centre for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE). http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/ encyclopedia/en/article/107/(accessed March 2011).
52. Story, M.F. 2001. Principles of universal design. In Universal design handbook, ed. W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, 10.3-10.19. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Sucuoglu, B., and T. Kargn. 2006. Ilkogretimde Kaynastirma Uygulamalari: Yaklasimlar, Uygulamalar, Teknikler [Inclusive education in primary school: Approaches, practices, techniques]. Ankara: Morpa Kultur Yayinlari.
54. Thomas, G. 2009. An epistemology for inclusion. In Psychology for inclusive education: New directions in theory and practice, ed. P. Hick, R. Kershner and P.T. Farrell, 13-23. London and New York: Routledge.
55. Thomas, G., and A. Loxley. 2001. Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham: Open University Press, (Electronic Source: Ebrary database).
56. Topping, K., and S. Maloney, eds. 2005. Introduction The RoutledgeFalmer reader in inclusive education, 2-14. London and New York: Routledge.
57. UNESCO. 1994. Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA-E.PDF (accessed January 2012).
58. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. Article 26 and Article 21. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#atop (accessed March 2012).
59. Ware, L. 2004. Ideology and politics of (in) exclusion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
60. Winzer, M.A. 2000. The inclusion movement: Review and reflections on reform in special education. In Special education in the 21st century: Issues of ?nclusion and reform, ed. M.A. Winzer and K. Mazurek, 5-26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.