On-demand control system for deep brain stimulation for treatment of intention tremor

Neuromodulation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 230-235

  Yamamoto, Takamitsu ^a   Katayama, Yoichi ^a   Ushiba, Junichi ^b   Yoshino, Hiroko ^b   Obuchi, Toshiki ^a   Kobayashi, Kazutaka ^a   Oshima, Hideki ^a   Fukaya, Chikashi ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Deep brain stimulation; essential tremor; intention tremor; involuntary movement; on demand control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HUMAN; INTENTION TREMOR; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROMODULATION; THALAMUS VENTRAL NUCLEUS; TREMOR;

AGED; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; THALAMUS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREMOR;

EID: 84878571100     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00521.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 203-214.
2. Blond S, Caparos-Lefebvre D, Parker F, et al. Control of tremor and involuntary movement disorders by chronic stereotactic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. J Neurosurg 1992; 77: 62-68.
3. Limousin P, Speelman JD, Gielen F, Janssens M,. Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation in Parkinsonian and essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 289-296.
4. Rehncrona S, Johnels B, Widner H, et al. Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 163-170.
5. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Kano T, et al. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of parkinsonian, essential, and poststroke tremor: a suitable stimulation method and changes in effective stimulation intensity. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 201-209.
6. Hariz MI, Shamsgovara R, Johansson F, Hariz GM, Fagerlund M,. Tolerance and tremor rebound following long-term chronic thalamic stimulation for Parkinson and essential tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72: 208-218.
7. Koller WC, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor. Mov Disord 2001; 16: 464-468.
8. Kumar R, Lozano A, Sime E, Troster AI, Pahwa R,. Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential and parkinsonian tremor. Neurology 2003; 61: 1601-1604.
9. Kronenbuerger M, Fromm C, Block F, et al. On-demand deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a report on four cases. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 401-405.
10. Katayama Y, Kano T, Kobayashi K, et al. Feed-forward control of post-stroke movement disorders by on-demand type stimulation of the thalamus and motor cortex. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2006; 99: 21-23.
11. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C,. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In:, Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson's disease and movement disorders. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1993: 271-280.
12. Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T,. Control of persistent hemiballismus by chronic thalamic stimulation. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 1995; 82: 501-505.
13. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Fukaya C, et al. New method of deep brain stimulation therapy with two electrodes implanted in parallel and side by side. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 1075-1078.
14. Mayers LJ, Lowery M, O'Malley M, et al. Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 124: 157-165.
15. Katagawa M, Murata J, Kikuchi S, et al. Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic area for severe proximal tremor. Neurology 2000; 55: 114-116.
16. Plaha P, Patel NK, Gill SS,. Stimulation of the subthalamic region for essential tremor. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 48-54.
17. Andrews RJ,. Neuromodulation: advances in the next five years. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1199: 204-211.
18. Rossi L, Foffani G, Marceglia S, et al. An electronic device for artifact suppression in human local field potential recordings during deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2007; 4: 96-106.
19. Rosa M, Marceglia S, Servello D, et al. Time dependent subthalamic local field potential changes after DBS surgery in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 2010; 222: 184-190.
20. Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC,. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 464-473.
21. Levy R, Ruland S, Weinand M, et al. Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and dfficacy. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 707-714.
22. Harvey RL, Winstein CJ,. Design for the everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 32-44.
23. Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Watanabe M, et al. Changes in motor function induced by chronic motor cortex stimulation in post-stroke pain patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2011; 89: 381-389.