What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration

Synthese

Volumn 190, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1865-1879

  Holbrook, J Britt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Consensus; Incommensurability; Integration; Interdisciplinarity; Invention; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878557272     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., Michaud, G. (Eds.). (1972) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
2. Bataille G. (1988) Inner experience (L. A. Boldt, Trans.). SUNY Press, Albany.
3. Bataille G. (1993) Literature and evil (A. Hamilton, Trans.). Marion Boyers, New York.
4. Collins H. M., Evans R. J. (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Sciences 32(2): 235-296.
5. COSEPUP. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (vol. 47, pp. 5-20). Newark: American Philosophical Association.
7. Frodeman R. (2010) Introduction. In: Frodeman R., Klein J. T., Mitcham C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp xxix-xxxix.
8. Frodeman R., Klein J. T., Mitcham C. (Eds.). (2010) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Galison P. (1997) Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London.
11. Gorman M. (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Boston.
12. Habermas, J. (1998 [1976]). What is universal pragmatics? In M. Cooke (Ed.), On the pragmatics of communication (pp. 21-104). Boston: MIT Press.
13. Hirsch Hadorn G. et al (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht.
14. Klein J. T. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI.
15. Klein J. T. (1996) Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities in the series on knowledge: Disciplinarity and beyond. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
16. Klein J. T. (2005) Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. In: Derry S. J., Schunn C. D., Gernsbacher M. A. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 23-50.
17. Klein J. T. (2010) A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman R., Klein J. T., Mitcham M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15-30.
18. Klein J. T. (2011) Research integration: A comparative knowledge base. In: Repko A. F., Newell W. H., Szostak R. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary research: Case studies of integrative understandings of complex problems. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 283-298.
19. Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Working Paper Series. http://eprints. ncrm. ac. uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines. pdf. Accessed 1 May 2012.
20. Kuhn T. S. (2000) The road since structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
21. Latucca L. R. (2001) Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.
22. Lyotard J.-F. (1988) The differend: Phrases in dispute. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
23. MacIntyre A. (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality?. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, IN.
24. MacIntyre A. (1990) Three rival versions of moral enquiry. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, IN.
25. Newell, W. H., & Klein, J. T. (2001). Issues in integrative studies (vol. 19). http://www. units. muohio. edu/aisorg/pubs/issues/toc_vol19. shtml.
26. Plaisance, K. S., & Fehr, C. (Eds.). (2010). Making philosophy of science more socially relevant. Synthese, 177(3), 301-492.
27. Repko A. F. (2008) Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage Publications, London.
28. Repko, A. F., Newell, W. H., Szostak, R. (Eds.). (2011) Interdisciplinary research: Case studies of integrative understandings of complex problems. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Schatzki T. (1986) The rationalization of meaning and understanding: Davidson and Habermas. Synthese 69: 51-79.
30. Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, 'translations,' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.
31. Stone, D. (2011). The experience of the tacit in multi- and interdisciplinary collaboration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s11097-011-9248-5. Accessed 1 May 2012.
32. Whyte K. P., Crease R. P. (2010) Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science. Synthese 177: 411-425.