A policy analysis perspective on ecological restoration

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Baker, Susan ^a   Eckerberg, Katarina ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ecological restoration; Interests and values; Policy cycle; Stages model

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

EID: 84878548882     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05476-180217     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, W. M., M. R. Perrow, and A. Carpenter. 2005. Perceptions of river managers of institutional constraints on floodplain restoration in the UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48(6):877-889.
2. Bash, J. S., and C. M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29(6):877-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00267-001-0066-3
3. Bernhardt, E. S., E. B. Sudduth, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, J. L. Meyer, G. Alexander, J. Follastad-Shah, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, R. Lave, J. Rumps, and L. Pagano. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15(3):482-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x
4. Breckenridge, L. P. 2006. Special challenges of transboundary coordination in restoring freshwater ecosystems. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 19 (1):13-32.
5. Buijs, A. E. 2009. Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Journal of Environmental management 90 (8):2680-2689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006
6. Callicot, J. B., and M. Nelson, editors. 1989. The great new wilderness debate. Georgia University Press, Athens, Georgia, USA.
7. Clewell, A. F., and J. Aronsson. 2007. Ecological restoration: principles, values and structure of an emerging profession. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
8. Coenen, F. H. J. M., D. Huitema, and L. J. O'Toole. 1998. Participation and environment. Pages 1-26 in F. H. J. M. Coenen, D. Huitema, and L. J. O'Toole, editors. Participation and the quality of environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/ comm2006/pdf/2020/1_EN_ACT_part1_v7%5B1%5D.pdf
10. Cowell, M. 1993. Ecological restoration and environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 15(1):19-32. http://dx.doi. org/10.5840/enviroethics199315136
11. Dobson, A. 2007. Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development 15 (5):276-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.344
12. Drenthen, M. 2009. Ecological restoration and place attachment: emplacing non-places? Environmental Values 18:285-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327109X12474739376451
13. Eden, S., and S. Tunstall. 2006. Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science-policy nexus in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24:661-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0608j
14. Ekker, T. 2004. The idea of wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness 10(1):15-17.
15. Elliot, R. 1982. Faking nature. Inquiry 25(1):81-93. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/00201748208601955
16. Fischer, F. 1998. Beyond empiricism: policy inquiry in post positivist perspective. Policy Studies 26(1):129-146. http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01929.x
17. Gross, M. 2008. Return of the wolf: ecological restoration and the deliberate inclusion of the unexpected. Environmental Politics 17(1):115-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010-701643159
18. Gunn, A. S. 1991. The restoration of species and natural environments. Environmental Ethics 13(4):291-310. http://dx. doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199113437
19. Ham, C., and M. Hill. 1997. The policy process in the modern state. Third edition. Prentice Hall, New York, New York, USA.
20. Higgs, E. S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11(2):338-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/ j.1523-1739.1997.95311.x
21. Higgs. E. 2005. The two-culture problem: ecological restoration and the integration of knowledge. Restoration Ecology 13(1):159-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1526-100X.2005.00020.x
22. Hill, M. 2005. The public policy process. Fourth edition. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.
23. Hirst, V. 2012. Catchment management using payments for ecosystem services to restore and maintain upland peat. Presented at the Joint British Ecological Society and IUCN UK Peatland Programme Symposium 'Investing in Peatlands: Demonstrating Success'. water@leeds, Valuing Nature Network, Natural Environment Research Council, Center for Ecology and Hydrology, IUCN UK Committee, Edinburgh, UK. [online] URL: http://www.valuing-nature.net/sites/ default/files/Restoring%20Peatlands%20using%20Payment% 20for%20Ecosystem%20Services_briefing%20note.pdf
24. Hull, R. B., and D. P. Robertson. 2000. The language of nature matters: we need a more public ecology. Pages 97-118 in P. H Gobster and R. Bruce Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Hurd, J. 2009. Characteristics of watershed restoration funding. In The political economy of watershed restoration series. Wildlands CPR, Missoula, Montana, USA. [online] URL: http://www.wildlandscpr.org/politicaleconomy/funding
26. Jordan, W. R. 2000. Restoration, community, and wilderness. Pages 21-36 in P. H. Gobster and R. Bruce Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
27. Katz, E. 2000. Another look at restoration: technology and artificial nature. Pages 37-48 in P. H. Gobster and R. Bruce Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
28. Keulartz, J. 2009. European nature conservation and restoration policy-problems and perspectives. Restoration Ecology 17(4):446-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1526-100X.2009.00566.x
29. Kondolf, G. M., S. Anderson, R. Lave, L. Pagano, A. Merenlender, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: what can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15(3):516-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1526-100X.2007.00247.x
30. Lejon, A. G. C., B. Malm Renöfält, and C. Nilsson, 2009. Conflicts associated with dam removal in Sweden. Ecology and Society 14(2): 4. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art4/
31. Light, A. 2000. Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: a pragmatic perspective. Pages 49-70 in P. H. Gobster and R. Bruce Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
32. Light, A. 2006. Ecological citizenship: the democratic promise of restoration. Pages 169-182 in R. Platt, editor. The humane metropolis: people and nature in the 21st century city. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
33. Light, A., and E. S. Higgs. 1996. The politics of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 18(3):227-247. http://dx. doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199618315
34. Lindblom, C. 1968. The policy-making process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
35. Meadowcroft, J. 2002. Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 61(2-4):169-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046 (02)00111-1
36. Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transisiton management and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42(4):323-340. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
37. Naidoo, R., A. Balmford, R. Costanza, B. Fisher, R. E. Green, B. Lehner, T. R. Malcolm, and T. H. Ricketts. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(28):9495-9500. http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0707823105
38. Nellemann, C., and E. Corcoran, editors. 2010. Dead planet, living planet-biodiversity and ecosystem restoration for sustainable development. A rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, Arendal, Norway. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/pdf/ RRAecosystems_screen.pdf
39. O'Riordan, T., and A. Jordan. 1995. The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental politics. Environmental Values 4(3):191-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096327195776679475
40. Platt, R. H. 2006. The humane metropolis: people and nature in the 21st century city. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
41. Pitt, J. 2006. Dredging for diplomacy? Colorado River management at the United States-Mexico border. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 19 (1):33-46.
42. Rochefort, D. A. 2011. Agenda setting. Pages 1-5 in J. Rabin and T. A. Wachhaus, editors. Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. Second edition. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
43. Ryan, R. L. 2000. A people-centered approach to designing and managing restoration projects: insights from understanding attachment to urban natural areas. Pages 209-228 in P. H. Gobster and R. Bruce Hull, editors. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
44. Sabatier, P., and D. Mazmanian. 1989. Implementation and public policy. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, USA.
45. Scherer, D. 1995. Evolution, human living and the practice of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 17(4):359-379.
46. Schuerholz, G. 2004. Transboundary ecosystem restoration in politically high conflict areas. Presented to the 16th International Conference, Society for Ecological Restoration, August 24-26, 2004, Victoria, Canada. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http:// www.globalrestorationnetwork.org/uploads/files/ LiteratureAttachments/349_transboundary-ecosystem-restorationin-politically-high-conflict-areas.pdf
47. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER). 2004. SER International primer on ecological restoration. SER, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.ser.org/ resources/resources-detail-view/ser-international-primer-onecological-restoration
48. Soulé, M., and G. Lease, editors. 1995. Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction. Island Press, Covelo, California, USA.
49. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). 2005. Åtgärdsprogram för bevarande av vitryggig hackspett (Action plan for protection of the White-backed Woodpecker). SEPA, Stockholm, Sweden. [online] URL: http://www.lansstyrelsen. se/vastragotaland/SiteCollectionDocuments/Sv/djur-och-natur/ hotade-vaxter-och-djur/atgardsprogram/vitrygg.pdf
50. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). 2012. Åtgärdsprogram för hotade arter (Action plan for threatened species). SEPA, Stockholm, Sweden. [online] URL: http:// www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbetei-Sverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Naturvard/Naturvard/ Atgardsprogram-for-hotade-arter/
51. Throop, W., editor. 2000. Environmental restoration: ethics, theory and practice. Humanity Books, Amherst, New York, USA.
52. Vedung, E. 1997. Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
53. Whalen, P. J., L. A. Toth, J. W. Koebel, and P. K. Strayer. 2002. Kissimmee River restoration: a case study. Water Science and Technology 45(11):55-62.
54. Winter, S. 2006. Implementation. Pages 151-166. in B. G. Peters and J. Pierre, editors. Handbook of public policy. Sage, London, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n9
55. Wunder, S., S. Engel, and S. Pagiola. 2008. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65(4):834-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.03.010