Conditioned preference to a methamphetamine-associated contextual cue in humans

Neuropsychopharmacology

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 921-929

  Mayo, Leah M ^a   Fraser, Diana ^b,c   Childs, Emma ^a   Momenan, Reza ^b   Hommer, Daniel W ^b   De Wit, Harriet ^a   Heilig, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM   (United States)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

amphetamine; conditioning; place preference; reward; stimulant

Indexed keywords

METHAMPHETAMINE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REWARD; SEASHORE; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878545199     PISSN: 0893133X     EISSN: 1740634X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DCxii: 370 p.p.
2. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological CorporationSan Antonio, TXVol 1: 82 p.p.
3. Childs E, de Wit H (2009). Amphetamine-induced place preference in humans. Biol Psychiatry 65: 900-904.
4. Childs E, de Wit H (2011). Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans. Addict Biol, e-pub ahead of print, 29 November 2012, doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011. 00416.x.
5. Cook CE, Jeffcoat AR, Sadler BM, Hill JM, Voyksner RD, Pugh DE et al (1992). Pharmacokinetics of oral methamphetamine and effects of repeated daily dosing in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 20: 856-862.
6. Derogatis L (1983). SCL-90-R: Manual-II. Clinical Psychmetric Research: Towson, M.D.
7. Gilman JM, Smith AR, Ramchandani VA, Momenan R, Hommer DW (2012). The effect of intravenous alcohol on the neural correlates of risky decision making in healthy social drinkers. Addict Biol 17: 465-478.
8. Haertzen CA (1966). Development of scales based on patterns of drug effects, using the addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Psychol Rep 18: 163-194.
9. Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH (1980). Drug preference and mood in humans: Diazepam. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 71: 269-273.
10. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D (2001). Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 21: RC159.
11. Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D (2000). FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage 12: 20-27.
12. Lane SD, Cherek DR (2000). Analysis of risk taking in adults with a history of high risk behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend 60: 179-187.
13. Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971). Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12: 245-258.
14. McNair D, Lorr M, Droppleman L (1971). The Profile of Mood States Manual. Educational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, C.A.
15. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977). Telling more than we can know-verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 84: 231-259.
16. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 51: 768-774.
17. Ramchandani VA, Umhau J, Pavon FJ, Ruiz-Velasco V, Margas W, Sun H et al (2011). A genetic determinant of the striatal dopamine response to alcohol in men. Mol Psychiatry 16: 809-817.
18. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2003). Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 54: 25-53.
19. Selzer ML (1971). The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 127: 1653-1658.
20. Tzschentke TM (1998). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56: 613-672.
21. Tzschentke TM (2007). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 12: 227-462.
22. Urban NB, Kegeles LS, Slifstein M, Xu X, Martinez D, Sakr E et al (2010). Sex differences in striatal dopamine release in young adults after oral alcohol challenge: a positron emission tomography imaging study with [(1)(1)C]raclopride. Biol Psychiatry 68: 689-696.
23. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Telang F, Maynard L, Logan J et al (2004). Evidence that methylphenidate enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain. Am J Psychiatry 161: 1173-1180.
24. White TL, Justice AJH, De Wit H (2002). Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73: 729-741.
25. Wilson TD, Dunn EW (2004). Self-knowledge: its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 493-518.