A three dimensional immersed smoothed finite element method (3D IS-FEM) for fluid-structure interaction problems

Computational Mechanics

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 129-150

  Zhang, Zhi Qian ^a   Liu, G R ^b   Khoo, Boo Cheong ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b 705 Engineering Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Characteristic based split; Finite element method; Fluid structure interaction; Immersed boundary; Immersed smoothed finite element method; Incompressible viscous fluid

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; VISCOSITY; VISCOUS FLOW;

CHARACTERISTIC BASED SPLIT SCHEMES; CHARACTERISTIC BASED SPLITS; EXPLICIT TIME INTEGRATION; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION PROBLEM; FOUR-NODE TETRAHEDRAL ELEMENTS; IMMERSED BOUNDARY; INCOMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLUIDS; SMOOTHED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84878521155     PISSN: 01787675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-012-0710-1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Donea J, Guiliani S, Halleux JP (1982) An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite-element method for transient dynamic fluid structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 33: 689-723. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90128-1
2. Hu HH, Patankar NA, Zhu MY (2001) Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian technique. J Comput Phys 169: 427-462. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6592
3. Liu WK, Chang H, Chen JS, Belytschko T (1988) Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Petrov-Galerkin finite-elements for nonlinear continua. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 68: 259-310. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90011-4
4. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38: 310-322. doi: 10.1007/s00466-006-0084-3
5. Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively-parallel finite-element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119: 157-177. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(94)00082-4
6. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite-element simulation of 3D incompressible flows-fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21: 933-953. doi: 10.1002/fld.1650211011
7. Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: 321-332. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8
8. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: 2002-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.014
9. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modelling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54: 855-900. doi: 10.1002/fld.1430
10. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid-structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43: 39-49. doi: 10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7
11. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Multiscale space-time fluid-structure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48: 247-267. doi: 10.1007/s00466-011-0571-z
12. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43: 3-37. doi: 10.1007/s00466-008-0315-x
13. Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10: 252-271. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(72)90065-4
14. Peskin CS (1977) Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys 25: 220-252. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90100-0
15. Mohd-Yusof J (1997) Combined immersed-boundary/b-Spline methods for simulations of flow in complex geometries CTR Annual Research Briefs, NASA Ames Research Center/Stanford University Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, CA
16. Fadlun EA, Verzicco R, Orlandi P, Mohd-Yusof J (2000) Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. J Comput Phys 161: 35-60. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6484
17. Gilmanov A, Sotiropoulos F (2005) A hybrid Cartesian/immersed boundary method for simulating flows with 3D, geometrically complex, moving bodies. J Comput Phys 207: 457-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.01.020
18. Uhlmann M (2005) An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows. J Comput Phys 209: 448-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.017
19. Zhang L, Gerstenberger A, Wang X, Liu WK (2004) Immersed finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193: 2051-2067. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12. 044
20. Liu WK, Liu Y, Farrell D, Zhang L, Wang XS, Fukui Y, Patankar N, Zhang Y, Bajaj C, Lee J, Hong J, Chen X, Hsu H (2006) Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: 1722-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.049
21. Zhang LT, Gay M (2007) Immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interactions. J Fluids Struct 23: 839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007. 01.001
22. Lee TR, Chang YS, Choi JB, Kim DW, Liu WK, Kim YJ (2008) Immersed finite element method for rigid body motions in the incompressible Navier-Stokes flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197: 2305-2316. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.013
23. Wang XS, Zhang LT (2010) Interpolation functions in the immersed boundary and finite element methods. Comput Mech 45: 321-334. doi: 10.1007/s00466-009- 0449-5
24. Zhang ZQ, Liu GR (2011) An immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid-structure interaction problems. Int J Comput Methods 8: 747-757. doi: 10.1142/S0219876211002794
25. Zhang ZQ, Liu GR, Khoo BC (2011) Immersed smoothed finite element method for two dimensional fluid-structure interaction problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. doi: 10.1002/nme.4299
26. Chen J-S, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50: 435-466. doi: 10.1002/nme.338
27. Liu GR (2010) A G space theory and a weakened weak (W-2) form for a unified formulation of compatible and incompatible methods: part I theory. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81: 1093-1126. doi: 10.1002/nme.2719
28. Liu GR (2010) A G space theory and a weakened weak (W-2) form for a unified formulation of compatible and incompatible methods: part II applications to solid mechanics problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81: 1127-1156. doi: 10.1002/nme.2720
29. Liu GR (2009) Mesh free methods: moving beyond the finite element methods, 2 edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
30. Liu GR (2009) On G space theory. Int J Comput Methods 6: 257-289. doi: 10.1142/S0219876209001863
31. Liu GR, Zhang GY (2009) A normed G space and weakened weak (W2) formulation of a cell-based smoothed point interpolation method. Int J Comput Methods 6: 147-179. doi: 10.1142/S0219876209001796
32. Liu GR (2008) A generalized gradient smoothing technique and the smoothed bilinear form for Galerkin formulation of a wide class of computational methods. Int J Comput Methods 5: 199-236. doi: 10.1142/S0219876208001510
33. Liu GR, Zhang GY (2008) Edge-based smoothed point interpolation methods. Int J Comput Methods 5: 621-646. doi: 10.1142/S0219876208001662
34. Liu GR, Nguyen-Thoi T, Lam KY (2009) An edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) for static, free and forced vibration analyses of solids. J Sound Vib 320: 1100-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.08.027
35. Liu GR, Nguyen-Thoi T (2010) Smoothed finite element method. CRC Press, Boca Raton
36. Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M (1986) A new finite-element formulation for computational fluid-dynamics. 5. circumventing the Babuska-Brezzi condition - a stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59: 85-99. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90025-3
37. Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible-flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95: 221-242. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90141-6
38. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32: 199-259. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90071-8
39. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite-element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial- domain space-time procedure. 1. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94: 339-351. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90059-S
40. Donea J (1984) A Taylor-Galerkin method for convective-transport problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20: 101-119. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620200108
41. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method, 5 edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
42. Zienkiewicz OC, Nithiarasu P, Codina R, Vázquez M, Ortiz P (1999) The characteristic-based-split procedure: an efficient and accurate algorithm for fluid problems. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 31: 359-392. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19990915)
43. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, Chichester
44. Massarotti N, Arpino F, Lewis RW, Nithiarasu P (2006) Explicit and semi-implicit CBS procedures for incompressible viscous flows. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66: 1618-1640. doi: 10.1002/nme.1700
45. Lai MC, Peskin CS (2000) An immersed boundary method with formal second-order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. J Comput Phys 160: 705-719. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6483
46. Boffi D, Gastaldi L, Heltai L (2007) On the CFL condition for the finite element immersed boundary method. Comput Struct 85: 775-783. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.009
47. Zhao H, Freund JB, Moser RD (2008) A fixed-mesh method for incompressible flow-structure systems with finite solid deformations. J Comput Phys 227: 3114-3140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.019
48. Mordant N, Pinton JF (2000) Velocity measurement of a settling sphere. Eur Phys J B 18: 343-352. doi: 10.1007/PL00011074
49. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1996) Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134: 351-373. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(95)00988-4
50. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) 3D simulation of fluid-particle interactions with the number of particles reaching 100. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 145: 301-321. doi: 10.1016/s0045-7825(96)01223-6
51. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1999) Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Comput Mech 23: 130-143. doi: 10.1007/s004660050393
52. Johnson A, Tezduyar T (2001) Methods for 3D computation of fluid-object interactions in spatially periodic flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: 3201-3221. doi: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00389-3
53. Turek S, Hron J (2006) Proposal for numerical benchmarking of fluid-structure interaction between an elastic object and laminar incompressible flow In: Bungartz H-J, Schäfer M (eds) Fluid-structure interaction (Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 371-385
54. Heil M, Hazel AL, Boyle J (2008) Solvers for large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches. Comput Mech 43: 91-101. doi: 10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6