An integrated tool suite for en route radar controllers in nextgen

27th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 2010, ICAS 2010

Volumn 5, Issue , 2010, Pages 4001-4011

  Mercer, Joey ^a   Prevot, Thomas ^a   Brasil, Connie ^a   Mainini, Matthew ^a   Kupfer, Michael ^a   Smith, Nancy ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Air traffic management; Data comm; Trajectory planning

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; AMES RESEARCH CENTERS; AMOUNTS OF TRAFFICS; DATA COMM; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP; RADAR CONTROLLERS; TRAJECTORY PLANNING;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; NASA;

AERODYNAMICS;

EID: 84878509344     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Federal Aviation Administration. (2010). FAA Aerospace Forecast Fiscal Years 2010-2030. Retrieved June 6, 2010, from http://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation/aerospace_forecasts/2010-2030/
2. Stein, E. (1985). Air Traffic Controller Workload: An Examination of Workload Probe. DOT/FAA/CTTN84/24. DOT/FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
3. Lee, P., Mercer, J., & Callantine, T. (2007). Examining the Moderating Effect of Workload on Controller Task Distribution. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Beijing, China, 339-348.
4. Shingledecker, C., Giles, S., Darby, E., Pino, J., & Hancock, T. (2005). Projecting the Effect of CPDLC on NAS Capacity. MITRE Technical Paper 05-0119. McLean, VA: The MITRE Corporation.
5. Lester, E., & Hansman, J. (2007). Benefits and Incentives for ADS-B Equipage in the National Airspace System. Report No. ICAT-2007-2. Cambridge, MA: Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. Brudnicki, D., & McFarland, A. (1997). User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) Conflict Probe Performance and Benefits Assessment. MITRE Product MP97W0000112. McLean, VA: The MITRE Corporation.
7. McNally D., Bach, R., & Chan, W. (1998). Field Test Evaluation of the CTAS Conflict Prediction and Trial Planning Capability. AIAA Paper No. 98-4480, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
8. Prevôt, T., Lee, P., Callantine, T., Mercer, J., Homola, J., Smith, N., et al. (in press). Human-inthe- Loop Evaluation of NextGen Concepts in the Airspace Operations Laboratory. Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies (MST) Conference, Toronto, Canada.
9. Smith, N., Lee, P., Prevôt, T., Homola, J., Lee, H., Kessell, A., et al. (in press). A Human-in-the-Loop Investigation of Multi-Sector Planning Operations for the NextGen Mid-Term. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Austin, TX.
10. Erzberger, H., Lauderdale, T., & Chu, Y. (in press). Automated Conflict Resolution, Arrival Management and Weather Avoidance for ATM. Paper presented at the International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France.
11. Joint Planning and Development Office. (n.d.). Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System. Retrieved, June 6, 2010, from http://www.jpdo.gov/library/NextGen_ConOps_v3 0.pdf
12. Erzberger, H., Here, K. (2008). Algorithm and operational concept for resolving short-range conflicts. Paper presented at the International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, AK, USA.
13. McNally, D., Erzberger, H., Bach, R., & Chan, W. (1999). A Controller Tool for Transition Airspace. AIAA Paper No. 99-4298, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.