A Two-Stage Cascade Model of BOLD Responses in Human Visual Cortex

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Kay, Kendrick N ^a   Winawer, Jonathan ^a   Rokem, Ariel ^a   Mezer, Aviv ^a   Wandell, Brian A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD OXYGENATION LEVEL DEPENDENT; CASCADE MODELING; FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES; GENERAL MODEL; HUMAN VISUAL CORTEX; KNOWLEDGE IT; NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS; NORMALISATION; PROPERTY; SECOND ORDERS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRASTRIATE BODY AREA; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR SYSTEM; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VARIANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84878495139     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003079     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Albrecht DG, Hamilton DB, (1982) Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. J Neurophysiol 48: 217-237.
2. Carandini M, Sengpiel F, (2004) Contrast invariance of functional maps in cat primary visual cortex. J Vis 4: 130-143.
3. Davidenko N, Remus DA, Grill-Spector K, (2012) Face-likeness and image variability drive responses in human face-selective ventral regions. Hum Brain Mapp 33: 2334-2349.
4. Pasupathy A, Connor CE, (2001) Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. J Neurophysiol 86: 2505-2519.
5. Kastner S, De Weerd P, Ungerleider LG, (2000) Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 83: 2453-2457.
6. Thielscher A, Kolle M, Neumann H, Spitzer M, Gron G, (2008) Texture segmentation in human perception: a combined modeling and fMRI study. Neuroscience 151: 730-736.
7. Kay KN, Naselaris T, Prenger RJ, Gallant JL, (2008) Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452: 352-355.
8. Busse L, Wade AR, Carandini M, (2009) Representation of concurrent stimuli by population activity in visual cortex. Neuron 64: 931-942.
9. Carandini M, Heeger DJ, Movshon JA, (1997) Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 17: 8621-8644.
10. Heeger DJ, (1992) Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9: 181-197.
11. Kay K, Winawer J, Mezer A, Wandell B, (2013) Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol doi 10.1152jn.00105.2013/jn.00105.2013.
12. Graham NV, (2011) Beyond multiple pattern analyzers modeled as linear filters (as classical V1 simple cells): useful additions of the last 25 years. Vision Res 51: 1397-1430.
13. Landy MS, Graham N (2004) Visual perception of texture. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS, editors. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Gavish M, Donoho D, (2012) Three Dream Applications of Verifiable Computational Results. Computing in Science & Engineering 14: 26-31.
15. Dumoulin SO, Wandell BA, (2008) Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 39: 647-660.
16. Brouwer GJ, Heeger DJ, (2011) Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 106: 2108-2119.
17. McDonald JS, Mannion DJ, Clifford CW, (2012) Gain control in the response of human visual cortex to plaids. J Neurophysiol 107: 2570-2580.
18. Rust NC, Movshon JA, (2005) In praise of artifice. Nat Neurosci 8: 1647-1650.
19. Felsen G, Dan Y, (2005) A natural approach to studying vision. Nat Neurosci 8: 1643-1646.
20. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, Movshon JA, (2002) Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 88: 2530-2546.
21. Sceniak MP, Hawken MJ, Shapley R, (2001) Visual spatial characterization of macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 85: 1873-1887.
22. Logothetis NK, (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453: 869-878.
23. Logothetis NK, Wandell BA, (2004) Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu Rev Physiol 66: 735-769.
24. Carandini M, Demb JB, Mante V, Tolhurst DJ, Dan Y, et al. (2005) Do we know what the early visual system does? J Neurosci 25: 10577-10597.
25. Wu MC, David SV, Gallant JL, (2006) Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Annu Rev Neurosci 29: 477-505.
26. Carandini M, (2012) From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far? Nat Neurosci 15: 507-509.
27. Priebe NJ, Ferster D, (2008) Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. Neuron 57: 482-497.
28. Heeger DJ, Ress D, (2002) What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 142-151.
29. DiCarlo JJ, Zoccolan D, Rust NC, (2012) How does the brain solve visual object recognition? Neuron 73: 415-434.
30. Fukushima K, (1980) Neocognitron: a self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol Cybern 36: 193-202.
31. Heeger DJ, Simoncelli EP, Movshon JA, (1996) Computational models of cortical visual processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 623-627.
32. Rolls ET, (2012) Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet. Front Comput Neurosci 6: 35.
33. Serre T, Kreiman G, Kouh M, Cadieu C, Knoblich U, et al. (2007) A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. Prog Brain Res 165: 33-56.
34. Wang HX, Heeger DJ, Landy MS, (2012) Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression. Vision Res 62: 192-200.
35. Hallum LE, Landy MS, Heeger DJ, (2011) Human primary visual cortex (V1) is selective for second-order spatial frequency. J Neurophysiol 105: 2121-2131.
36. Angelucci A, Bressloff PC, (2006) Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. Prog Brain Res 154: 93-120.
37. Bair W, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA, (2003) Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurosci 23: 7690-7701.
38. Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A, (2004) Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84: 541-577.
39. El-Shamayleh Y, Movshon JA, (2011) Neuronal responses to texture-defined form in macaque visual area V2. J Neurosci 31: 8543-8555.
40. Song Y, Baker CL Jr, (2007) Neuronal response to texture- and contrast-defined boundaries in early visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 24: 65-77.
41. Tanaka H, Ohzawa I, (2009) Surround suppression of V1 neurons mediates orientation-based representation of high-order visual features. J Neurophysiol 101: 1444-1462.
42. Larsson J, Landy MS, Heeger DJ, (2006) Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 95: 862-881.
43. Dumoulin SO, Dakin SC, Hess RF, (2008) Sparsely distributed contours dominate extra-striate responses to complex scenes. Neuroimage 42: 890-901.
44. Willmore BD, Prenger RJ, Gallant JL, (2010) Neural representation of natural images in visual area V2. J Neurosci 30: 2102-2114.
45. Walker GA, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD, (1999) Asymmetric suppression outside the classical receptive field of the visual cortex. J Neurosci 19: 10536-10553.
46. Solomon SG, Peirce JW, Lennie P, (2004) The impact of suppressive surrounds on chromatic properties of cortical neurons. J Neurosci 24: 148-160.
47. Petrov Y, McKee SP, (2006) The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. J Vis 6: 224-238.
48. Sceniak MP, Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, Shapley R, (1999) Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat Neurosci 2: 733-739.
49. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA, (2001) Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1193-1216.
50. Baddeley R, (1996) Searching for filters with 'interesting' output distributions: an uninteresting direction to explore? Network 7: 409-421.
51. Brady N, Field DJ, (2000) Local contrast in natural images: normalisation and coding efficiency. Perception 29: 1041-1055.
52. Scholte HS, Ghebreab S, Waldorp L, Smeulders AW, Lamme VA, (2009) Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. J Vis 9: 29.1-15.
53. Tadmor Y, Tolhurst DJ, (2000) Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes. Vision Res 40: 3145-3157.
54. Johnson AP, Baker CL Jr, (2004) First- and second-order information in natural images: a filter-based approach to image statistics. J Opt Soc Am A 21: 913-925.
55. Perna A, Tosetti M, Montanaro D, Morrone MC, (2008) BOLD response to spatial phase congruency in human brain. J Vis 8: 15.1-15.
56. Henriksson L, Hyvarinen A, Vanni S, (2009) Representation of cross-frequency spatial phase relationships in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 29: 14342-14351.
57. Brincat SL, Connor CE, (2004) Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7: 880-886.
58. Hegde J, Van Essen DC, (2007) A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4. Cereb Cortex 17: 1100-1116.
59. Ito M, Goda N, (2011) Mechanisms underlying the representation of angles embedded within contour stimuli in area V2 of macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 33: 130-142.
60. Winawer J, Horiguchi H, Sayres RA, Amano K, Wandell BA, (2010) Mapping hV4 and ventral occipital cortex: The venous eclipse. J Vis 10: 1-22.
61. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
62. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442.
63. Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Ruff DA, Kiani R, Bodurka J, et al. (2008) Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey. Neuron 60: 1126-1141.
64. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer. 533 p.
65. Jezzard P, Balaban RS, (1995) Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 34: 65-73.
66. Freire L, Mangin JF, (2001) Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. Neuroimage 14: 709-722.
67. Monti MM, (2011) Statistical Analysis of fMRI Time-Series: A Critical Review of the GLM Approach. Front Hum Neurosci 5: 28.
68. Adelson EH, Bergen JR, (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 284-299.
69. Albrecht DG, Geisler WS, (1991) Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 7: 531-546.
70. David SV, Gallant JL, (2005) Predicting neuronal responses during natural vision. Network 16: 239-260.
71. Sahani M, Linden JF (2003) How linear are auditory cortical responses? In: Becker S, Thrun S, Obermayer K, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 109-116.
72. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York: Springer. 488 p.
73. Olmos A, Kingdom FA, (2004) A biologically inspired algorithm for the recovery of shading and reflectance images. Perception 33: 1463-1473.