Letter order is not coded by open bigrams

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 135-150

  Kinoshita, Sachiko ^a   Norris, Dennis ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Letter order; Open bigrams; Orthographic representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878492692     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adelman J.S. Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review 2011, 118:570-582.
2. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B., Loftis B., et al. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
4. Bates, D.M., Maechler, M., & Dai, B. (2008). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-24.
5. Binder J.R., Medlar D.A., Westbury C.F., Liebenthal E., Buchanan L. Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage 2006, 33:739-748.
6. Bowers J.S., Vigliocco G., Haan R. Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1705-1719.
7. Brysbaert M., New B. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:977-990.
8. Cohen L., Dehaene S. Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2004, 22:466-476.
9. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and Performance, VI 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. S. Dornic (Ed.).
10. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Peery C., Ziegler J., Langdon R. DRC: Dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
11. Damian M. Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:154-165.
12. Davis C.J. The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model 1999, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
13. Davis C.J. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 2010, 117:713-758.
14. Davis C.J. Orthographic input coding: A review. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 180-206. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Andrews (Ed.).
15. Dehaene S. Reading in the brain 2009, Viking, New York.
16. Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:335-341.
17. Ferrand L., New B., Brysbaert M., Keuleers E., Bonin P., Meot A., et al. The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:488-496.
18. Forster K.I. Form priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 127-146. Erlbaum, Hove, UK. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
19. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698.
20. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schocknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1987, 39:211-251.
21. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
22. García-Orza J., Perea M., Muñoz S. Are transposition effects specific to letters?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:1603-1618.
23. Gomez P., Ratcliff R., Perea M. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 2008, 115:577-600.
24. Goswami U., Ziegler J.C. A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:142-143.
25. Grainger J., Dufau S. The front end of visual word recognition. Models and methods, orthography and phonology 2012, Vol. I:159-184. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
26. Grainger J., Granier J.P., Farioli F., van Assche E., van Heuven W.J. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:865-884.
27. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
28. Grainger J., van Heuven W. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-23. Nova Science, New York. P. Bonin (Ed.).
29. Grainger J., Whitney C. *******Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:58-59.
30. Grainger J., Ziegler J.C. A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2(54):1-13.
31. Guerrera C., Forster K.I. Masked form priming with extreme transpositions. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:117-142.
32. Keuleers E., Diependaele K., Brysbaert M. Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1:174. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174.
33. Keuleers E., Lacey P., Rastle K., Brysbaert M. The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods 2012, 44:287-304.
34. Kinoshita S., Castles A., Davis C. The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 24:506-526.
35. Kinoshita S., Kaplan L. Priming of abstract letter identities in the letter match task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1873-1885.
36. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Transposed-letter priming of pre-lexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2009, 35:1-18.
37. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Masked priming effect reflects evidence accumulated by the prime. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:194-204.
38. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Does the familiarity bias hypothesis explain why there is no masked priming for "NO" decisions?. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39:319-334.
39. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Task-dependent masked priming effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-12. (Article 178). 10.3389/psyg.2012.00178.
40. Kucera H., Francis W. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
41. Lupker S.J., Davis C.J. Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2009, 35:618-639.
42. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
43. Mozer M.C. Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 83-104. Erlbaum, Hove, UK. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
44. Norris D. The Bayesian Reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113:327-357.
45. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:433-455.
46. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Reading through a noisy channel: Why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review 2012, 119:517-545.
47. Norris D., Kinoshita S., van Casteren M. A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62:254-271.
48. Perea M., Acha J. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:127-137.
49. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: State of the art 2003, 97-120. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
50. Perea M., Dunabeitia J.A., Carreiras M. Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:397-406.
51. Pinker S., Prince A. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a PDP model of language acquisition. Cognition 1988, 28:73-193.
52. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
53. Popple A., Levi D.M. The perception of spatial order at a glance. Vision Research 2005, 45:1085-1090.
54. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. .
55. Rayner K., White S., Johnson R., Liversedge S. Reading words with jumbled letters: There is a cost. Psychological Science 2006, 17:192-193.
56. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
57. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
58. Shillcock R., Ellison T.M., Monaghan P. Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review 2000, 107:824-851.
59. Snowden R., Thompson P., Trosvianko T. Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
60. Van Assche E., Grainger J. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2006, 32:399-415.
61. Velan H., Frost R. Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:913-918.
62. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:221-243.
63. Whitney C. Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language 2008, 107:170-178.
64. Whitney C. Location, location, location: How it affects the neighborhood (effect). Brain and Language 2012, 118:90-104.
65. Whitney C., Cornelissen P. SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:143-164.
66. Wickelgren W.A. Auditory or articulatory coding in verbal short-term memory. Psychological Review 1969, 76:232-235.