Expression and distribution of cell adhesion-related proteins in bovine parthenogenetic embryos: The effects of oocyte vitrification

Theriogenology

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 34-40

  Zeng, Yan ^a   Fu, Xiangwei ^a   Zhou, Guangbin ^a,b   Yue, Mingxing ^a   Zhou, Yanhua ^a   Zhu, Shien ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

catenin; Cattle; E cadherin; F actin; Oocytes; Vitrification

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; BETA CATENIN; CADHERIN; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; OOCYTE; PARTHENOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BETA CATENIN; BLASTOCYST; CADHERINS; CATTLE; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; OOCYTES; PARTHENOGENESIS; RNA, MESSENGER;

BOS; BOVINAE;

EID: 84878471660     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, Dondorp W., de Wert G., Pennings G., Shenfield F., Devroey P., et al. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod 2012, 27:1231-1237.
2. Dovey S. Oocyte cryopreservation: advances and drawbacks. Minerva Ginecol 2012, 64:485-500.
3. Seidel G.E. Modifying oocytes and embryos to improve their cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2006, 65:228-235.
4. Papis K., Shimizu M., Izaike Y. Factors affecting the survivability of bovine oocytes vitrified in droplets. Theriogenology 2000, 54:651-658.
5. Vieira A.D., Mezzalira A., Barbieri D.P., Lehmkuhl R.C., Rubin M.I., Vajta G. Calves born after open pulled straw vitrification of immature bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 2002, 45:91-94.
6. Hou Y.P., Dai Y.P., Zhu S.E., Zhu H.B., Wu T.Y., Gong G.C., et al. Bovine oocytes vitrified by the open pulled straw method and used for somatic cell cloning supported development to term. Theriogenology 2005, 64:1381-1391.
7. Diez C., Munoz M., Caamano J., Gomez E. Cryopreservation of the bovine oocyte: current status and perspectives. Reprod Domest Anim 2012, 47(Suppl 3):76-83.
8. Saragusty J., Arav A. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction 2011, 141:1-19.
9. Demant M., Trapphoff T., Frohlich T., Arnold G.J., Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Vitrification at the pre-antral stage transiently alters inner mitochondrial membrane potential but proteome of in vitro grown and matured mouse oocytes appears unaffected. Hum Reprod 2012, 27:1096-1111.
10. Hotamisligil S., Toner M., Powers R.D. Changes in membrane integrity, cytoskeletal structure, and developmental potential of murine oocytes after vitrification in ethylene glycol. Biol Reprod 1996, 55:161-168.
11. Chamayou S., Bonaventura G., Alecci C., Tibullo D., Di Raimondo F., Guglielmino A., et al. Consequences of metaphase II oocyte cryopreservation on mRNA content. Cryobiology 2011, 62:130-134.
12. Hyttel P., Vajta G., Callesen H. Vitrification of bovine oocytes with the open pulled straw method: ultrastructural consequences. Mol Reprod Dev 2000, 56:80-88.
13. Stachowiak E.M., Papis K., Kruszewski M., Iwanenko T., Bartlomiejczyk T., Modlinski J.A. Comparison of the level(s) of DNA damage using Comet assay in bovine oocytes subjected to selected vitrification methods. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44:653-658.
14. Li L., Bennett S.A., Wang L. Role of E-cadherin and other cell adhesion molecules in survival and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Adh Migr 2012, 6:59-70.
15. Fleming T.P., Sheth B., Fesenko I. Cell adhesion in the preimplantation mammalian embryo and its role in trophectoderm differentiation and blastocyst morphogenesis. Front Biosci 2001, 6:D1000-D1007.
16. Nganvongpanit K., Muller H., Rings F., Gilles M., Jennen D., Holker M., et al. Targeted suppression of E-cadherin gene expression in bovine preimplantation embryo by RNA interference technology using double-stranded RNA. Mol Reprod Dev 2006, 73:153-163.
17. Kim J.B., Islam S., Kim Y.J., Prudoff R.S., Sass K.M., Wheelock M.J., et al. N-cadherin extracellular repeat 4 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and increased motility. J Cell Biol 2000, 151:1193-1206.
18. Nagafuchi A., Takeichi M. Transmembrane control of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion: a 94 kDa protein functionally associated with a specific region of the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin. Cell Regul 1989, 1:37-44.
19. Kemler R., Ozawa M. Uvomorulin-catenin complex: cytoplasmic anchorage of a Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecule. BioEssays 1989, 11:88-91.
20. Pauken C.M., Capco D.G. Regulation of cell adhesion during embryonic compaction of mammalian embryos: roles for PKC and beta-catenin. Mol Reprod Dev 1999, 54:135-144.
21. Natale D.R., Watson A.J. Rac-1 and IQGAP are potential regulators of E-cadherin-catenin interactions during murine preimplantation development. Gene Expr Patterns 2002, 2:17-22.
22. van Roy F., Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008, 65:3756-3788.
23. Ohsugi M., Butz S., Kemler R. Beta-catenin is a major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein during mouse oocyte maturation and preimplantation development. Develop Dynamic 1999, 216:168-176.
24. Yonemura S. Cadherin-actin interactions at adherens junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011, 23:515-522.
25. Camous S., Heyman Y., Meziou W., Menezo Y. Cleavage beyond the block stage and survival after transfer of early bovine embryos cultured with trophoblastic vesicles. J Reprod Fertil 1984, 72:479-485.
26. Barnes F.L. Early cleavage and the maternal zygotic transition in bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1990, 33:141-152.
27. Rosenkrans C.F., Zeng G.Q., McNamara G.T., Schoff P.K., First N.L. Development of bovine embryos in vitro as affected by energy substrates. Biol Reprod 1993, 49:459-462.
28. Thouas G.A., Korfiatis N.A., French A.J., Jones G.M., Trounson A.O. Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 2001, 3:25-29.
29. Poehland R., Tomek W., Becker F., Kurth J., Kanitz W., Bhojwani S. Qualitative and quantitative differences of cytoskeleton proteins in embryos produced in vitro, in vivo, and by somatic nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 2008, 75:1109-1119.
30. Shirai T., Konnai S., Ikebuchi R., Okagawa T., Suzuki S., Sunden Y., et al. Molecular cloning of bovine lymphocyte activation gene-3 and its expression characteristics in bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011, 144:462-467.
31. Yan Z., Ma Y.Z., Liu D.J., Cang M., Wang R., Bao S. Targeted suppression of connexin 43 in ovine preimplantation embryos by RNA interference using long double-stranded RNA. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010, 23:456-464.
32. Tesfaye D., Lonergan P., Hoelker M., Rings F., Nganvongpanit K., Havlicek V., et al. Suppression of connexin 43 and E-cadherin transcripts in in vitro derived bovine embryos following culture in vitro or in vivo in the homologous bovine oviduct. Mol Reprod Dev 2007, 74:978-988.
33. Kim G., Okumura M., Bosnakovski D., Ishiguro T., Park C.H., Kadosawa T., et al. Effects of ascorbic acid on proliferation and biological properties of bovine chondrocytes in alginate beads. Jap J Vet Res 2003, 51:83-94.
34. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408.
35. Van Soom A., Boerjan M.L., Bols P.E., Vanroose G., Lein A., Coryn M., et al. Timing of compaction and inner cell allocation in bovine embryos produced in vivo after superovulation. Biol Reprod 1997, 57:1041-1049.
36. Bavister B.D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995, 1:91-148.
37. Maluf M., Perin P.M., Foltran Januario D.A., Nascimento Saldiva P.H. In vitro fertilization, embryo development, and cell lineage segregation after pre- and/or postnatal exposure of female mice to ambient fine particulate matter. Fertil Steril 2009, 92:1725-1735.
38. Diez C., Duque P., Gomez E., Hidalgo C.O., Tamargo C., Rodriguez A., et al. Bovine oocyte vitrification before or after meiotic arrest: effects on ultrastructure and developmental ability. Theriogenology 2005, 64:317-333.
39. Dinnyes A., Lonergan P., Fair T., Boland M.P., Yang X. Timing of the first cleavage post-insemination affects cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 1999, 53:318-324.
40. Lonergan P., Dinnyes A., Fair T., Yang X., Boland M. Bovine oocyte and embryo development following meiotic inhibition with butyrolactone I. Mol Reprod Dev 2000, 57:204-209.
41. Modina S., Abbate F., Germana G.P., Lauria A., Luciano A.M. Beta-catenin localization and timing of early development of bovine embryos obtained from oocytes matured in the presence of follicle stimulating hormone. Anim Reprod Sci 2007, 100:264-279.
42. Succu S., Bebbere D., Bogliolo L., Ariu F., Fois S., Leoni G.G., et al. Vitrification of in vitro matured ovine oocytes affects in vitro pre-implantation development and mRNA abundance. Mol Reprod Dev 2008, 75:538-546.
43. Fair T., Hyttel P., Greve T. Bovine oocyte diameter in relation to maturational competence and transcriptional activity. Mol Reprod Dev 1995, 42:437-442.
44. Trejo A., Ambriz D., Navarro-Maldonado M.C., Mercado E., Rosado A. Presence and distribution of E-cadherin in the 4-cell golden hamster embryo. Effect of maternal age and parity. Zygote 2008, 16:271-277.
45. Nakano H., Shimada A., Imai K., Takahashi T., Hashizume K. The cytoplasmic expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in bovine trophoblasts during binucleate cell differentiation. Placenta 2005, 26:393-401.
46. McLachlan R.W., Kraemer A., Helwani F.M., Kovacs E.M., Yap A.S. E-cadherin adhesion activates c-Src signaling at cell-cell contacts. Mol Biol Cell 2007, 18:3214-3223.
47. Kohan-Ghadr H.R., Smith L.C., Arnold D.R., Murphy B.D., Lefebvre R.C. Aberrant expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin proteins in placenta of bovine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 2012, 24:588-598.
48. Succu S., Leoni G.G., Bebbere D., Berlinguer F., Mossa F., Bogliolo L., et al. Vitrification devices affect structural and molecular status of in vitro matured ovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 2007, 74:1337-1344.
49. Parrish A.R., Catania J.M., Orozco J., Gandolfi A.J. Chemically induced oxidative stress disrupts the E-cadherin/catenin cell adhesion complex. Toxicol Sci 1999, 51:80-86.
50. Gupta M.K., Uhm S.J., Lee H.T. Effect of vitrification and beta-mercaptoethanol on reactive oxygen species activity and in vitro development of oocytes vitrified before or after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2010, 93:2602-2607.
51. Ao A., Erickson R.P. Injection of Antisense RNA specific for E-cadherin demonstrates that E-cadherin facilitates compaction, the first differentiative step of the mammalian embryo. Antisense Res Dev 1992, 2:153-163.