Evaluation of magnetic nanoparticle samples made from biocompatible ferucarbotran by time-correlation magnetic particle imaging reconstruction method

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Ishihara, Yasutoshi ^a   Honma, Takumi ^a   Nohara, Satoshi ^b   Ito, Yoshio ^b  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Nagoya Research Laboratory   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ferucarbotran; Image reconstruction; Magnetic particle imaging; MPI; Nanoparticle; Resovist; Time correlation

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DEXTRAN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DEXTRANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84878466068     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-15     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed H, El-Sayed MA. Gold nanoparticles: interesting optical properties and recent applications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nanomedicine 2007, 2:681-693. 10.2217/17435889.2.5.681, 17976030.
2. Dougherty TJ, Gomer CJ, Henderson BW, Jori G, Kessel D, Korbelik M, Moan J, Peng Q. Photodynamic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:889-905. 10.1093/jnci/90.12.889, 9637138.
3. El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA. Selective laser photo-thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett 2006, 239:129-135. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.07.035, 16198049.
4. Hergt R, Hiergeist R, Zeisberger M, Schüler D, Heyen U, Hilger I, Kaiser WA. Magnetic properties of bacterial magnetosomes as potential diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2005, 293:80-86.
5. Jordan A, Scholz R, Maier-Hauff K, Johannsen M, Wust P, Nadobny J, Schirra H, Schmidt H, Deger S, Loening S, Lanksch W, Felix R. Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2001, 225:118-126.
6. Gleich B. Method for determining the spatial distribution of magnetic particles. DE 10151778(A1)05 2003, 05:08.
7. Gleich B, Weizenecker J. Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic nanoparticles. Nature 2005, 435:1214-1217. 10.1038/nature03808, 15988521.
8. Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Dahnke H, Borgert J. Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging. Phys Med Biol 2009, 54:L1-L10. 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/L01, 19204385.
9. Schmale I, Rahmer J, Gleich B, Kanzenbach J, Schmidt JD, Bontus C, Woywode O, Borgert J. First phantom and in vivo MPI images with an extended field of view 2011, 796510.6. Florida: Proc. of SPIE Medical Imaging.
10. Kusayama Y, Ishihara Y. A preliminary study on the molecular imaging device using magnetic nanoparticles. Technical Report of IEICE. MBE 2007, 107:15-18.
11. Kusayama Y, Ishihara Y. High-resolution image reconstruction method on the molecular imaging using magnetic nanoparticles. IEICE Trans. D 2009, J92-D:1653-1662.
12. Ishihara Y, Kuwabara T, Honma T, Nakagawa Y. Correlation-based image reconstruction methods for magnetic particle imaging. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 2012, E95-D:872-879.
13. Honma T, Shimizu S, Ishihara Y. Correlation-based image reconstruction methods for magnetic particle imaging. Proceedings of the Branch Conference of Japanese Society for Medical Biological Engineering 2012 2012, Tokyo, Kyoso M, 2012: C-1-04.
14. Goodwill PW, Conolly SM. The X-space formulation of the magnetic particle imaging process: 1-D signal, resolution, bandwidth, SNR, SAR, and magnetostimulation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010, 29:1851-1859.
15. Chikazumi S. Physics of Magnetism 1964, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Charap SH.
16. Ferguson RM, Minard KR, Krishnan KM. Optimization of nanoparticle core size for magnetic particle imaging. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2009, 321:1548-1551. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.083, 2709850, 19606261.
17. Ferguson RM, Minard KR, Khandhar AP, Krishnan KM. Optimizing magnetite nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging. Med Phys 2011, 38:1619-1626. 10.1118/1.3554646, 3064684, 21520874.
18. Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Wagner S, Trahms L. How the size distribution of magnetic nanoparticles determines their magnetic particle imaging performance. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98:182502.1-182502.3.
19. Ludwig F, Wawrzik T, Yoshida T, Gehrke N, Briel A, Eberbeck D, Schilling M. Optimization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2012, 48:3780-3783.
20. Goodwill PW, Scott GC, Stang PP, Conolly SM. Narrowband magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009, 28:1231-1237.
21. Chantrell RW, Popplewell J, Charles SW. Measurements of particle size distribution parameters in ferrofluids. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 1978, 14:975-977.
22. Yarlagadda RKR. Analog and Digital Signals and Systems 2010, New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
23. Yoshida T, Enpuku K, Ludwig F, Dieckhoff J, Wawrzik T, Lak A, Schilling M. Characterization of Resovist® nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. Springer Proceedings in Physics 2012, 140:3-7.