Synchronization of beta and gamma oscillations in the somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic steady-state response

Experimental Neurology

Volumn 245, Issue , 2013, Pages 40-51

  Ross, Bernhard ^a,b   Jamali, Shahab ^a,b   Miyazaki, Takahiro ^a   Fujioka, Takako ^a  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Beta oscillation; Flutter sensation; Gamma oscillation; Magnetoencephalography; Primary somatosensory cortex; Sensory binding; Sensory integration time; Somatosensory steady state response; Vibro tactile stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; STEADY STATE; TACTILE STIMULATION;

BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN WAVES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TOUCH; VIBRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878465890     PISSN: 00144886     EISSN: 10902430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adrian E.D. The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1950, 2:377-388.
2. Azzena G.B., et al. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). I: Stimulus rate effects. Hear. Res. 1995, 83:1-8.
3. Bardouille T., et al. Attention modulates beta oscillations during prolonged tactile stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31:754-760.
4. Bardouille T., Ross B. MEG imaging of sensorimotor areas using inter-trial coherence in vibrotactile steady-state responses. Neuroimage 2008, 42:323-331.
5. Buzsaki G., Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 2004, 304:1926-1929.
6. Dockstader C., et al. Cortical dynamics of selective attention to somatosensory events. Neuroimage 2010, 49:1777-1785.
7. Engel A.K., et al. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:704-716.
8. Freeman W.J. Harmonic oscillation as model for cortical excitability changes with attention in cats. Science 1961, 133:2058-2059.
9. Freeman W.J., et al. Aperiodic phase re-setting in scalp EEG of beta-gamma oscillations by state transitions at alpha-theta rates. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 19:248-272.
10. Fries P., et al. The gamma cycle. Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30:309-316.
11. Galambos R. Tactile and auditory stimuli repeated at high rates (30-50 per sec) produce similar event related potentials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1982, 388:722-728.
12. Galambos R., et al. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981, 78:2643-2647.
13. Gutschalk A., et al. Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:856-868.
14. Haegens S., et al. Somatosensory anticipatory alpha activity increases to suppress distracting input. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:677-685.
15. Hashimoto I., et al. Reciprocal modulation of somatosensory evoked N20m primary response and high-frequency oscillations by interference stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:1445-1451.
16. Herrmann C.S. Human EEG responses to 1-100Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp. Brain Res. 2001, 137:346-353.
17. Holmes C.J., et al. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998, 22:324-333.
18. Hutcheon B., Yarom Y. Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23:216-222.
19. Huttunen J., Homberg V. Influence of stimulus repetition rate on cortical somatosensory potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation: implications for generation mechanisms. J. Neurol. Sci. 1991, 105:37-43.
20. Jamali S., Ross B. Precise mapping of the somatotopic hand area using neuromagnetic steady-state responses. Brain Res. 2012, 1455:28-39.
21. Kakigi R., et al. Effects of tactile interference stimulation on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Neuroreport 1996, 7:405-408.
22. Kobayashi T., Kuriki S. Principal component elimination method for the improvement of S/N in evoked neuromagnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 46:951-958.
23. Kopell N., et al. Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:1867-1872.
24. Lachaux J.-P., et al. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 8:194-208.
25. Langdon A.J., et al. Multi-frequency phase locking in human somatosensory cortex. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011, 105:58-66.
26. Lehmann D., Michel C.M. Intracerebral dipole source localization for FFT power maps. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 76:271-276.
27. Libet B., et al. Production of threshold levels of conscious sensation by electrical stimulation of human somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1964, 27:546-578.
28. Llinás R.R., et al. In vitro neurons in mammalian cortical layer 4 exhibit intrinsic oscillatory activity in the 10- to 50-Hz frequency range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88:897-901.
29. Llinás R.R., Paré D. Of dreaming and wakefulness. Neuroscience 1991, 44:521-535.
30. Meador K.J., et al. Gamma coherence and conscious perception. Neurology 2002, 59:847-854.
31. Neuper C., et al. ERD/ERS patterns reflecting sensorimotor activation and deactivation. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 159:211-222.
32. Okada Y., et al. An automatic identification and removal method for eye-blink artifacts in event-related magnetoencephalographic measurements. Physiol. Meas. 2007, 28:1523-1532.
33. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:1842-1857.
34. Picton T.W., et al. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1987, 82:165-178.
35. Picton T.W., et al. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42:177-219.
36. Pollen D.A. Brain stimulation and conscious experience. Conscious. Cogn. 2004, 13:626-645.
37. Presacco A., et al. Auditory steady-state responses to 40-Hz click trains: relationship to middle latency, gamma band and beta band responses studied with deconvolution. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121:1540-1550.
38. Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1966, 20:238-248.
39. Regan D. A high frequency mechanism which underlies visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1968, 25:231-237.
40. Roelfsema P.R., et al. Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature 1997, 385:157-161.
41. Ross B. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:1265-1277.
42. Ross B., et al. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:679-691.
43. Ross B., et al. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:4082-4093.
44. Ross B., et al. Interference in dichotic listening: the effect of contralateral noise on oscillatory brain networks. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35:106-118.
45. Ross B., Pantev C. Auditory steady-state responses reveal amplitude modulation gap detection thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:2193-2206.
46. Ross B., et al. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear. Res. 2002, 165:68-84.
47. Ross B., et al. Physiological detection of interaural phase differences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:1017-1027.
48. Sannita W.G. Stimulus-specific oscillatory responses of the brain: a time/frequency-related coding process. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:565-583.
49. Santarelli R., et al. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). II: Addition of responses to individual stimuli. Hear. Res. 1995, 83:9-18.
50. Simon J.Z., Wang Y. Fully complex magnetoencephalography. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005, 149:64-73.
51. Sinkkonen J., et al. Gabor filters: an informative way for analysing event-related brain activity. J. Neurosci. Methods 1995, 56:99-104.
52. Snyder A.Z. Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 84:257-268.
53. Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3:151-162.
54. Tass P., et al. Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: application to magnetoencephalography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81:3291-3294.
55. Tobimatsu S., et al. Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:1953-1958.
56. Tommerdahl M., et al. Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:160-170.
57. Vialatte F.B., et al. Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 90:418-438.
58. Winkler I., et al. Temporal constraints of auditory event synthesis: evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport 1998, 9:495-499.
59. Yabe H., et al. Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:615-619.
60. Zygierewicz J., et al. Computationally efficient approaches to calculating significant ERD/ERS changes in the time-frequency plane. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005, 145:267-276.