Regional regulatory initiatives addressing GHG leakage in the USA

Climate Change and European Emissions Trading: Lessons for Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 225-256

  Bluemel, Erik B ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878465699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Aulisi, A. et al. (2005), WRI White Paper: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in U.S. States: Observations and Lessons from the OTC NOx Budget Program, Washington, US: World Resources Institute.
2. Bird, L. et al. (2007), Technical Report No. NREL/TP-640-41076: Implications of Carbon Regulation for Green Power Markets, Golden, US: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
3. Bluemel, E.B. (2007a), 'Unraveling the Global Warming Regime Complex: Competitive Entropy in the Regulation of the Global Public Good', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (6), 1981-2049.
4. Bluemel, E.B. (2007b), 'Biomass Energy: Ensuring Sustainability Through Conditioned Economic Incentives', Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 19 (4), 673-97.
5. Brevetti, R. (19 March 2008), U.S. Trade Representative Tells Dingell of Concerns with Greenhouse Emissions Proposals, BNA International Environment Daily.
6. Bryk, D. and J.J. Snyder (22-23 March 2007), 'Regional and State Programs: Measuring, Allocating, Trading, and Complying, Global Warming: Climate Change and the Law', in American Law Institute-American Bar Association, SM106 ALIABA, pp. 91-124.
7. Burtraw, D. et al. (2006), 'Lessons for a Cap-and-Trade Program', in W. Michael Hanemann and Alexander E. Farrell (eds), Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California, Berkeley, US: California Climate Change Center, University of California, Berkeley; pp. 5-1 to 5-47.
8. Cap and Trade Subgroup (2006), Cap and Trade Program Design Options: Report of the Cap and Trade Subgroup of the Climate Action Team Final Report, Sacramento, US: Climate Action Team.
9. Committee on Energy & Commerce, House of Representatives (2008), 'Climate Change Legislation Design White Paper: Appropriate Roles for Different Levels of Government', http://energycommerce.house.gov/Climate_Change/white%20 paper%20st- lcl%20roles%20final%202-22.pdf, February.
10. Committee on Energy & Commerce, House of Representatives (2008), 'Climate Change Legislation Design White Paper: Competitiveness Concerns/Engaging Developing Countries', http://energycommerce.house.gov/Climate_Change/White_Paper.Competitiveness.013108.pdf, January.
11. Committee on Energy & Commerce, House of Representatives (2007), 'Climate Change Legislation Design White Paper: Scope of a Cap-and-Trade Program', http://energycommerce.house.gov/Climate_Change/White_Paper.100307.pdf, October.
12. Cowart, R. (2006), 'Addressing Leakage in a Cap-and-Trade System: Treating Imports as Sources, Report to RGGI Leakage Subgroup', http://www.raponline.org/ Pubs/RC-Leakage-4-06.pdf, April.
13. Cowart, R. (2004), 'Another Option for Power Sector Carbon Cap and Trade Systems - Allocating to Load, Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Concept Memo', http://www.rggi.org/docs/allocating_to_load.pdf, 1 May.
14. Davis, S.E. (2005), California Energy Commission Draft Consultant Report No. CEC- 600-2005-010-D: Policy Options for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Power Imports, Washington, US: Center for Clean Air Policy.
15. Ellerman, A.D. et al. (2003), Emissions Trading in the U.S.: Experience, Lessons, and Considerations for Greenhouse Gases, Arlington, US: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
16. Fitch, J., California Public Utilities Commission (2007), 'Why a Load-Based Emissions Cap for California?', ftp://ftp.cpuc.ca.gov/puc/energy/electric/ climate+change/JulieFitchPresentation.ppt, 19 April.
17. Gillenwater, M. and C. Breidenich (2007), 'Internalizing Carbon Costs in Electricity Markets: Using Certificates in a Load-Based Emissions Trading Scheme, Discussion Paper', http://www.princeton.edu/~mgillenw/Load%20based% 20cap%20paper-formatted%20_final.pdf, August.
18. Jones, S.C. and P.R. McIntyre (27 July 2007), 'Filling the Vacuum: State and Regional Climate Change Initiatives', BNA Environment Reporter: Analysis and Perspective, 38 (30), 1640-49.
19. Market Advisory Committee, California Air Resources Board (2007), 'Recommendations for Designing a Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade System for California', http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/events/2007-06-12_mac_meeting/ 2007-06-01_MAC_DRAFT_REPORT.PDF, 30 June.
20. Morganstern, R.D. et al. (2007), Backgrounder: Competitiveness Impacts on Carbon Dioxide Pricing Policies on Manufacturing, Washington, US: Resources for the Future.
21. Palmer, K. and D. Burtraw (2007), Backgrounder: The Electricity Sector and Climate Policy, Washington, US: Resources for the Future.
22. Parker, L.P. and B.D. Yacobucci (2007), CRS Report RL33846: Climate Change: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Bills in the 110th Congress, Washington, US: Congressional Research Service.
23. Patrick, J. (11 October 2006), 'Bicoastal Carbon Trading: California and RGGI Markets Mapped Out', Evolution Markets Executive Brief, 29, pp. 1-3.
24. Peress, N.J. and M. Booher (April 2007), 'East and West Coast States Take Divergent Paths on Carbon Cap and Trade for Suppliers of Electricity', ABA Air Quality Comm. Newsletter, 10(2), 7-8.
25. Potts, B.H. (June 2006), 'Regulating Greenhouse Gas "Leakage": How California Can Evade the Impending Constitutional Attacks', The Electricity Journal, 19(5), 43-53.
26. Prindle, B. (2006), American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 'RGGI Leakage Working Group, Energy Efficiency's Role in Limiting RGGI Leakage', http://www.rggi.org/docs/prindle.ppt, 15 June.
27. Pring, G. (2006), 'A Decade of Emissions Trading in the USA: Experiences and Observations for the EU', in Marjan Peeters and Kurt Deketelaere (eds), EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenges of New Regulatory Initiatives, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, US: Edward Elgar; pp. 188-204.
28. Rabe, B.G. et al. (2005), 'State Competition as a Source Driving Climate Change Mitigation', New York University Environmental Law Journal, 14 (1), 1-53.
29. Sussman, Edna (May 2006), 'New York Addresses Climate Change with the First Mandatory U.S. Greenhouse Gas Program', May-New York State Bar Journal, 78, p. 43-50.
30. Tanton, T. (2008), California's Energy Policy: A Cautionary Tale for the Nation, Washington, US: Competitive Enterprise Institute.
31. Tietenberg, T. et al. (2003), 'The Tradable-Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), 400-19.
32. United Nations Env't Program (2007), Global Environment Outlook 4, Valletta, Malta: Progress Press.
33. Weisselberg, P. (2007), 'Shaping the Energy Future in the American West: Can California Curb Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Out-of-State, Coal-Fired Power Plants Without Violating the Dormant Commerce Clause?', University of San Francisco Law Review, 42(1), 185-225.
34. Whetzel, C. (28 February 2008), 'California Law Does Not Guarantee Carbon Capand- Trade Scheme', BNA Daily Environment Report, 39, p. A-5.
35. Wiener, J.B. (2007), 'Think Globally, Act Globally: The Limits of Local Climate Policies', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(6), 1961-79.
36. Wiener, J.B. (2001), 'Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law', Ecology Law Quarterly, 27(4), 1295-1371.
37. Wiener, J.B. (1999), 'Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context', Yale Law Journal, 108(4), 677-800.
38. Yang, T. (2006), 'The Problem of Maintaining Emissions "Caps" in Carbon Trading Programs Without Federal Government Involvement: A Brief Examination of the Chicago Climate Exchange and the Northeast Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative', Fordham Environmental Law Review, 17(2), 271-86.