메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 344-354

The Group Questionnaire: A clinical and empirically derived measure of group relationship

Author keywords

alliance; cohesion; group psychotherapy; Group Questionnaire; measurement; therapeutic relationship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DEVICES; FEMALE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; STANDARD;

EID: 84878451176     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2012.729868     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (67)

References (19)
  • 2
    • 70549112943 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy
    • Bakali, J., Baldwin, S. and Lorentzen, S. 2009. Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19: 332 - 343. doi: 10.1080/10503300902894430
    • (2009) Psychotherapy Research , vol.19 , pp. 332-343
    • Bakali, J.1    Baldwin, S.2    Lorentzen, S.3
  • 3
    • 79960631557 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Der Gruppenfragebogen (GQ-D). Instrument zur Messung von therapeutischen Beziehungen in der Gruppenpsychotherapie
    • Bormann, B., Burlingame, G. and Strauss, B. 2011. Der Gruppenfragebogen (GQ-D). Instrument zur Messung von therapeutischen Beziehungen in der Gruppenpsychotherapie. Psychotherapeut, 56: 297 - 309. doi: 10.1007/s00278-011-0841-4
    • (2011) Psychotherapeut , vol.56 , pp. 297-309
    • Bormann, B.1    Burlingame, G.2    Strauss, B.3
  • 4
    • 34147120556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gruppenklima, Kohäsion, Allianz und Empathie als Komponenten der therapeutischen Beziehung in Gruppenpsychotherapien - Überprüfung eines Mehrebenen-Modells
    • Bormann, B. and Straus, B. 2007. Gruppenklima, Kohäsion, Allianz und Empathie als Komponenten der therapeutischen Beziehung in Gruppenpsychotherapien - Überprüfung eines Mehrebenen-Modells. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 43: 1 - 20.
    • (2007) Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik , vol.43 , pp. 1-20
    • Bormann, B.1    Straus, B.2
  • 7
    • 40849146448 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sensitivity to change of the brief psychiatric rating scale - extended (BPRS-E): An item and subscale analysis
    • Burlingame, G., Seaman, S., Johnson, J., Whipple, J. and Richardson, E. 2006. Sensitivity to change of the brief psychiatric rating scale - extended (BPRS-E): An item and subscale analysis. Psychological Services., 3: 77 - 87. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.3.2.77
    • (2006) Psychological Services. , vol.3 , pp. 77-87
    • Burlingame, G.1    Seaman, S.2    Johnson, J.3    Whipple, J.4    Richardson, E.5
  • 9
    • 0000640248 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of emotion in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge-eating disorder: When things have to feel worse before they get better
    • Castongauy, L.G., Pincus, A.L., Agras, W.S. and Hines, C.E. 1998. The role of emotion in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge-eating disorder: When things have to feel worse before they get better. Psychotherapy Research, 8: 225 - 238.
    • (1998) Psychotherapy Research , vol.8 , pp. 225-238
    • Castongauy, L.G.1    Pincus, A.L.2    Agras, W.S.3    Hines, C.E.4
  • 12
    • 0347420071 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group alliance and cohesion as predictors of drug and alcholol abuse treatment outcomes
    • Gillaspy, J., Wright, A., Campbell, C., Stokes, S. and Adinoff, B. 2002. Group alliance and cohesion as predictors of drug and alcholol abuse treatment outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 12: 213 - 229. doi: 10.1093/ptr/12.2.213
    • (2002) Psychotherapy Research , vol.12 , pp. 213-229
    • Gillaspy, J.1    Wright, A.2    Campbell, C.3    Stokes, S.4    Adinoff, B.5
  • 13
    • 23244459991 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models
    • Johnson, J., Burlingame, G.M., Olsen, D., Davies, R. and Gleave, R.L. 2005. Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52: 310 - 321. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
    • (2005) Journal of Counseling Psychology , vol.52 , pp. 310-321
    • Johnson, J.1    Burlingame, G.M.2    Olsen, D.3    Davies, R.4    Gleave, R.L.5
  • 14
    • 34547417139 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy
    • Joyce, A., Piper, W. and Ogrodniczuk, J. 2007. Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57 (3): 269 - 296. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2007.57.3.269
    • (2007) International Journal of Group Psychotherapy , vol.57 , Issue.3 , pp. 269-296
    • Joyce, A.1    Piper, W.2    Ogrodniczuk, J.3
  • 15
    • 1542500484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Therapeutic alliance, cohesion and outcome in long-term analytic group: A preliminary study
    • Lorentzen, S., Sexton, H. and Hoglend, P. 2004. Therapeutic alliance, cohesion and outcome in long-term analytic group: A preliminary study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 58: 33 - 40. doi: 10.1080/08039480310000770
    • (2004) Nordic Journal of Psychiatry , vol.58 , pp. 33-40
    • Lorentzen, S.1    Sexton, H.2    Hoglend, P.3
  • 16
    • 0030803736 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The contribution of group cohesion and group alliance to the outcome of group psychotherapy
    • Marziali, E., Munroe-Blum, H. and McCleary, L. 1997. The contribution of group cohesion and group alliance to the outcome of group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 47: 475 - 497.
    • (1997) International Journal of Group Psychotherapy , vol.47 , pp. 475-497
    • Marziali, E.1    Munroe-Blum, H.2    McCleary, L.3
  • 17
    • 1542654600 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to evaluate a mental health outcome measure
    • In: Coughlin K.M., editors New York, New York,: Faulkner/Gray
    • Reisinger, C.W. and Burlingame, G.M. 1997. " How to evaluate a mental health outcome measure ". In The 1997 behavioral outcomes and guidelines sourcebook, Edited by: Coughlin, K.M. 370 - 374. New York: Faulkner/Gray.
    • (1997) The 1997 behavioral outcomes and guidelines sourcebook , pp. 370-374
    • Reisinger, C.W.1    Burlingame, G.M.2
  • 18
    • 84878443385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The validity of the Group Questionnaire: Construct clarity or construct drift
    • Unpublished dissertation, Brigham Young University
    • Thayer, S. 2012. The validity of the Group Questionnaire: Construct clarity or construct drift. Unpublished dissertation, Brigham Young University.
    • (2012)
    • Thayer, S.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.