Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: A cohort stud

BMJ Open

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Turner, S ^a   Wright, D ^a   Maeso, R ^a   Cook, A ^a   Milne, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STAFF; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84878443720     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002521     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86-9.
2. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:1-81.
3. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2007. http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf (accessed Mar 2013).
4. National Institutes of Health Public Access. 2012. http://publicaccess. nih.gov/(accessed Mar 2013).
5. Krzyzanowska M, Pintilie M, Tannock I. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA 2003;290:495-501. (Pubitemid 37430503)
6. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1-236.
7. Stern JM, Simes Jr. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical projects. Br Med J 1997;315:640-5. (Pubitemid 27387174)
8. Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:1-28. MR000006. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3.
9. Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, et al. An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technol Assess 2007;11:1-200.
10. HTA Journal. Health Technology Assessment website. 2013. http://www.hta.ac.uk/(accessed Mar 2013).
11. Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, et al. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 2012;344: d7292.
12. Takeda A, Loveman E, Harris P, et al. Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2010;12:1-82.
13. Harris P, Takeda A, Loveman E, et al. Time to full publication of studies of anticancer drugs for breast cancer, and the potential for publication bias. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010;26:110-16.