How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1-15

  Hardisty, David J ^a   Thompson, Katherine F ^b   Krantz, David H ^b   Weber, Elke U ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Discounting; Measurement; Method; Time preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878433080     PISSN: 19302975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahlbrecht, M., & Weber, M. (1997). An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Science, 43, 813-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.43.6.813
2. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). "Coherent arbitrariness": Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ 00335530360535153
3. Baron, J. (1997). Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 72-88.
4. Baron, J., & Greene, J. (1996). Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 107-125.
5. Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., & Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Science, 35, 270-284. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1287/mnsc.35.3.270
6. Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never-, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 447-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ PL00005490
7. Chabris, C. F., Laibson, D., Morris, C. L., Schuldt, J. P., & Taubinsky, D. (2008). Individual laboratorymeasured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11166-008-9053-x
8. Cornsweet, T. N. (1962). The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485-491.
9. Daly, M., Harmon, C. P., & Delaney, L. (2009). Psychological and biological foundations of time preference. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 659-669.
10. Doyle, J. R. (2013). Survey of time preference, delay discounting models. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 116-135.
11. Doyle, J. R., Chen, C. H., & Savani, K. (2011). New designs for research in delay discounting. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 759-770.
12. Fischhoff, B., Quadrel, M. J., Kamlet, M., Loewenstein, G., Dawes, R., Fischbeck, P., Stroh, P. (1993). Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211-234.
13. Frederick, S. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 26, 39-53. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1023/A:1022298223127
14. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 37, 221-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11166-008-9051-z
15. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311
16. Guyse, J. L., & Simon, J. (2011). Consistency among elicitation techniques for intertemporal choice: A within-subjects investigation of the anomalies. Decision Analysis, 8, 233-246.
17. Hardisty, D. J., Appelt, K. C., & Weber, E. U. (2012). Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, in press.
18. Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 329-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016433
19. Harris, C. R. (2010). Feelings of dread and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.709
20. Hsee, C., Loewenstein, G., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 06-14.
21. Johnson, E. J., Haubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 461-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0278-7393.33.3.461
22. Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.126.1.54
23. Kirby, K. N., & Marakovic, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delaydiscounting with subjects and amounts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 22-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1086
24. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031207
25. Manzini, P., Mariotti, M., & Mittone, L. (2008). The elicitation of time preferences. Working paper.
26. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazure, J. A. Nevin & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. McFadden, D. (1994). Contingent valuation and social choice. American Journal of Agrigultural Economics, 76, 689-708.
28. Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 193-210. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.2.1.193
29. Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Time discounting predicts creditworthiness. Psychological Science, 23, 56-58.
30. Myerson, J., & Green, L. (1995). Models of individual choice. Journal of Experimental Analysis and Behavior, 64, 263-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1995. 64-263
31. Olivola, C. Y., & Wang, S. W. (2011). Patience auctions: The impact of time vs money bidding on elicited discount rates. Working Paper (accessed Nov 17, 2011 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol2013/papers.cfm? abstract_id=1724851).
32. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
33. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233-244. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233
34. Read, D., Frederick, S., & Scholten, M. (2012). Drift: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, in press.
35. Read, D., & Roelofsma, P. (2003). Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 91, 140-153. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0749-5978(03)00060-8
36. Reimers, S., Maylor, E. A., Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2009). Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income education and realworld impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 973-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2009.07.026
37. Robles, E., & Vargas, P. A. (2008). Parameters of delay discounting assessment: Number of trials, effort, and sequential effects. Behavioral Processes, 78, 285-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.012
38. Robles, E., Vargas, P. A., & Bejarano, R. (2009). Withinsubject differences in degree of delay discounting as a function of order of presentation of hypothetical cash rewards. Behavioral Processes, 81, 260-263. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.018
39. Rodzon, K., Berry, M. S., & Odum, A. L. (2011). Withinsubject comparison of degree of delay discounting using titrating and fixed sequence procedures. Behavioural Processes, 86, 164-167. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.09.007
40. Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155-161. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2967612
41. Shelley, M. K. (1993). Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates. Management Science, 39, 806-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.7.806
42. Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive psychology, 53, 1-26.
43. Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-207. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7
44. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95. 3.371
45. Ungemach, C., Stewart, N., & Reimers, S. (2011). How incidental values from the environment affect decisions about money, risk, and delay. Psychological Science, 22, 253-260.
46. Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2013). How time preferences differ across cultures: Evidence from 52 countries. Working paper.
47. Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008). Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 127-144). New York: Elsevier.
48. Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.60.110707.163633
49. Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., Milch, K. F., Chang, H., Brodscholl, J. C., & Goldstein, D. G. (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice. Psychological Science, 18, 516-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2007.01932.x
50. Zakay, D. (1990). The role of personal tendencies in the selection of decision-making strategies. Psychological Record, 40, 207-213.