Anaesthetic management in emergency cesarean section: Systematic literature review of anaesthetic techniques for emergency C-section;Manejo anestésico para operación cesárea urgente: Revisión sistemática de la literatura de técnicas anestésicas para cesárea urgente

Revista Colombiana de Anestesiologia

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 273-286

  Rueda Fuentes, José V ^a   Pinzón Flórez, Carlos E ^b   Ramírez, Mauricio Vasco ^c  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA BOLIVARIANA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia; Cesarean section; Emergencies; Obstetric anaesthesia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878378175     PISSN: 22562087     EISSN: 01203347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rca.2012.08.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (50)

1. Beltrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:98-113.
2. NHS Maternity Statistics, 2008-09. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics- anddata-collections/hospital-care/maternity/nhs-maternity-statistics-2008-09 [accessed 31.01.2011].
3. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics, Reproductive Statistics Branch. Data Brief No. 35, March 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs [accessed 31.01.2011].
4. Associated Press. C-section rates around globe at 'epidemic' levels. http://www.msnbc.msn.com [accessed 31.01.2011].
5. Graphs of historical caesarean section rates. http://www.birthchoiceuk. bcom/Professionals/CSHistory.htm [accessed 31.01.2011].
6. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 13: Caesarean section; 2004. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG13/Guidance/pdf/ English [accessed 31.01.2011].
7. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000;93:346-50. (Pubitemid 30461807)
8. Lewis G, editor. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003-2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007.
9. Davies JM, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW, Domino KB. Liability associated with obstetric anaesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:131-9.
10. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists Classification of urgency of caesarean section - a continuum of risk. RCOG Press; 2010. http://www.rcog.org.uk/[accessed 30.01.2011].
11. Cochrane [On-line database]. CENTRAL and the Cochrane Library, Issue 2 2010, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). [accessed 19 December 2010]. Available at: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/0/index. html.
12. PubMed [On-line database]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 1966. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/[accessed December 2010].
13. Lilacs [On line database]. Literatura latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud [accessed 19 December 2010]. Available at: http://bases.bireme.br/cgibin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah. xis&base=LILACS&lang=i&form=F.
14. Afolabi BB, Lesi FE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD004350.
15. Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah AN, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, Issue 1, Art. No. CD004662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2.
16. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Methodology Review Group. Report on the review of the method of grading guideline recommendations. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1999.
17. Scottish Office. Clinical Resources and Audit Group. Clinical guidelines: report by a working group. Edinburgh: Scottish Office; 1993.
18. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
19. Savidis A, Ammari A, Iatrou Ch, Maroulis G. The contribution of anaesthesia modus on reducing blood loss during caesarean section. Liberis V, Tsikouras P, Vogiatzaki T; 2009.
20. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2700.
21. Kinsella SM, Walton B, Sashidharan R, Draycott T. Category-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:362-8.
22. Chau-in W, Hintong T, Rodanant O, Lekprasert V, Punjasawadwong Y, Charuluxananan S, et al. Anaesthesia-related complications of caesarean delivery in Thailand: 16, 697 cases from the Thai Anaesthesia Incidents Study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93:1274-83.
23. Kinsella S. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:822-32. (Pubitemid 351951794)
24. Regan KJ, O'Sullivan G. The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:136-42.
25. Gori F, Pasqualucci A, Corradetti F, Milli M, Peduto VA. Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anaesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:53-7. (Pubitemid 47215735)
26. Sprung J, Flick RP, Wilder RT, Katusic SK, Pike TL, Dingli M, et al. Anaesthesia for cesarean delivery and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:302-10.
27. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, et al. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:896-902.
28. Wallace DH, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Giesecke AH, Shearer VE, Sidawi JE. Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:193-9.
29. Dyer RI, Farbas J, Schoeman L, Torr G, James M, et al. A randomised trial comparing general with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclamptics with a non-reassuring fetal heart trace. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 2003;12:202.
30. Goring-Morris J, Russell IF. A randomised comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine with a lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl mixture for epidural top-up for emergency caesarean section after "low dose" epidural for labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:109-14.
31. Malhotra S, Yentis SM. Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section - a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:667-71. (Pubitemid 46929959)
32. Sng BL, Pay LL, Sia AT. Comparison of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and fentanyl, 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for extension of epidural analgesia for urgent caesarean section after low dose epidural infusion during labour. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36:659-64.
33. Allam J. Epidural lidocaine-bicarbonate-adrenaline vs. levobupivacaine for emergency Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:243-9. (Pubitemid 351257784)
34. Balaji P, Dhillon P, Russell IF. Low-dose epidural top up for emergency caesarean delivery: a randomised comparison of levobupivacaine versus lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:335-41.
35. Ngan Kee WD, Lee A, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Karmakar MK, Gin T. Randomised double-blinded comparison of phenylephrine vs ephedrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for non-elective Caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:1319-26.
36. Khaw K, Wang CC, Ngan Kee WD, Tam WH, Ng FF, Critchley LA, et al. Supplementary oxygen for emergency Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:90-6.
37. Wee M, Brown H, Reynolds F. The national institute of clinical excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean sections: implications for the anaesthetics. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 2005;14:147-58. (Pubitemid 40431602)
38. Andrews WW, Ramin SM, Maberry MC, Shearer V, Black S, Wallace DH. Randomized study of general anaesthesia vs. epidural or spinal-epidural analgesia for cesarean section in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet. 1992.
39. Lertakyamanee J, Chinachoti T, Tritrakarn T, Mugangkasem J, Somboonnanonda A, Kolatat T. Comparison of general and regional anaesthesia for cesarean section: success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 1999;82:672-80.
40. Ng KW, Parsons J, Cyna AM. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD003765.
41. Afolabi BB. Regional vs. general anaesthesia for cesarean sectional. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD004350.
42. Vasco Ramírez M, Lopera LM. Técnicas intravenosas para operación cesárea. Rev Col Anesth. 2006;34:35.
43. Fortescue C, Wee MY, Malhotra S, Yentis SM, Holdcroft A. Is preparation for emergency obstetric anaesthesia adequate? A maternal questionnaire survey. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:336-40. (Pubitemid 47385986)
44. Schewe JC, Komusin A, Zinserling J, Nadstawek J, Hoeft A, Hering R. Effects of spinal anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for ceasarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:52-9.
45. Mhyre JM, Grennfield ML. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluate strategies to avoid epidural vein cannulation during obstetric epidural catheter placement. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1232-42.
46. Bjørnestad E, Rosseland LA. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:748-51.
47. Hong JY, Jee YS. Effects of epidural fentanyl on speed and quality of block for emergency cesarean section in extending continuous epidural labor analgesia using ropivacaine and fentanyl. J Corean Med Sci. 2010:25.
48. Huang CJ, Fan YC. Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: a population-based study. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:818-26.
49. Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim MH, Oh AY, Park KH, Park HP. Positional blood pressure change and the risk of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for cesarean delivery: an observational study. 2010;111:712-5.
50. Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Savasta LM. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1114-8.