Motion-guided attention promotes adaptive communications during social navigation

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1754, 2013, Pages

  Lemasson, B H ^a   Anderson, J J ^b   Goodwin, R A ^b  

^a US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective behaviour; Selective attention; Social information; Speed accuracy trade offs; Topological; Vision

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANIMAL; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; NEAREST NEIGHBOR ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOPOLOGY; TRADE-OFF; VISION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84878375650     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ward AJW, Herbert-Read JE, Sumpter DJT, Krause J. 2011 Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2312-2315. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1007102108)
2. Conradt L, List C. 2009 Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 719-742. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0276)
3. Couzin ID, James R, Mawdsley D, Croft D, Krause J. 2006 Social organization and information transfer in schooling fishes. In Fish cognition and behavior (eds C Brown, K LaLand, J Krause), pp. 166-185. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4. Krause J, Ruxton G. 2002 Living in groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Danchin É, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH. 2004 Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305, 487-491. (doi:10.1126/science.1098254)
6. Ballerini M et al. 2008 Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232-1237. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0711437105)
7. Nagy M, Ákos Z, Biro D, Vicsek T. 2010 Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464, 890-894. (doi:10.1038/nature08891)
8. Grünbaum D. 1998 Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment. Evol. Ecol. 12, 503-522. (doi:10.1023/A:1006574607845)
9. Potts W. 1984 The chorus-line hypothesis of manoeuvre coordination in avian flocks. Nature 309, 344-345. (doi:10.1038/309344a0)
10. Viscido SV, Parrish JK, Grünbaum D. 2004 Individual behavior and emergent properties of fish schools: a comparison of observation and theory. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 273, 239-249. (doi:10.3354/meps273239)
11. Couzin ID. 2009 Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 36-43. (doi:10.1016/j. tics.2008.10.002)
12. Couzin I, Krause J, Franks N, Levin S. 2005 Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433, 513-516. (doi:10.1038/ nature03236)
13. Romanczuk P, Couzin ID, Schimansky-Geier L. 2009 Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 010602. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.010602)
14. Lemasson B, Anderson J, Goodwin RA. 2009 Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: the adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention. J. Theor. Biol. 261, 501-510. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi. 2009.08.013)
15. Bode NWF, Faria JJ, Franks DW, Krause J, Wood AJ. 2010 How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3065-3070. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0855)
16. Fernández-Juricic E, Kacelnik A. 2004 Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55, 502-511. (doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0698-9)
17. Bazazi S, Buhl J, Hale J, Anstey M, Sword G, Simpson S, Couzin ID. 2008 Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Curr. Biol. 18, 735-739. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.035)
18. Katz Y, Tunstrom K, Ioannou C, Huepe C, Couzin ID. 2011 Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18 720-18725. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1107583108)
19. Herbert-Read JE, Perna A, Mann RP, Schaerf TM, Sumpter DJT, Ward AJW. 2011 Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18 726-18731. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1109355108)
20. Inada Y, Kawachi K. 2002 Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. J. Theor. Biol. 214, 371-387. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2449)
21. Torney C, Neufeld Z, Couzin ID. 2009 Contextdependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22 055-22060. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0907929106)
22. Conradt L, Krause J, Couzin ID, Roper TJ. 2009 'Leading according to need' in self-organizing groups. Am. Nat. 173, 304-312. (doi:10. 1086/596532)
23. Chen L. 2005 The topological approach to perceptual organization. Vis. Cogn. 12, 553-637. (doi:10.1080/13506280444000256)
24. Nieder A. 2005 Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 177-190. (doi:10.1038/nrn1626)
25. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A. 2007 Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim. Cogn. 10, 63-70. (doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0036-5)
26. Shettleworth S. 2010 Cognition, evolution and behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Desimone R, Duncan J. 1995 Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205)
28. Wolfe J, Horowitz T. 2004 What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 1-7. (doi:1038/nrn1411)
29. Lehrer M, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Horridge GA. 1988 Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension. Nature 332, 356-357. (doi:10.1038/332356a0).
30. Fleishman L. 1992 The influence of the sensory system and the environment on motion patterns in the visual displays of anoline lizards and other vertebrates. Am. Nat. 139, S36-S61. (doi:10.1086/285304)
31. Ioannou C, Krause J. 2009 Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still. Biol. Lett. 5, 191-193. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0758)
32. Giraldeau LA, Caraco T. 2000 Social foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Fernández-Juricic E, Erichsen JT, Kacelnik A. 2004 Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 25-31. (doi:10.1016/j.tree. 2003.10.003)
34. Domenici P, Blake R. 1997 The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1165-1178.
35. Bode NWF, Franks DW, Wood AJ. 2011 Limited interactions in flocks: relating model simulations to empirical data. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 301-304. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0397)
36. Alexander R. 1999 Bioenergetics: One price to run, swim or fly? Nature 397, 651-653. (doi:10.1038/17687)
37. List C. 2004 Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 168-169. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.02.004)
38. Dukas R. 2004 Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain Behav. Evol. 63, 197-210. (doi:10.1159/000076781)
39. Viscido SV, Miller M, Wethey DS. 2002 The dilemma of the selfish herd: the search for a realistic movement rule. J. Theor. Biol. 217, 183-194. (doi:10.1006/yjtbi.3025)
40. Moussaïd M, Helbing D, Theraulaz G. 2011 How 9 simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6884-6888. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1016507108)
41. Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC. 2009 Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 743-753. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0204)
42. Swinderen BV. 2005 The remote roots of consciousness in fruit-fly selective attention? Bioessays 27, 321-330. (doi:10.1002/bies.20195)
43. Zanker J. 1995 Does motion perception follow Weber's law? Perception 24, 363-372. (doi:10. 1068/p240363)
44. Tu Y, Shimizu T, Berg H. 2008 Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14855-14860. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0807569105)