Conducting research using the electronic health record across multi-hospital systems: Semantic harmonization implications for administrators

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 355-360

  Bowles, Kathryn H ^a   Potashnik, Sheryl ^b   Ratcliffe, Sarah J ^b   Rosenberg, Melissa ^b   Shih, Nai Wei ^b   Topaz, Maxim ^b   Holmes, John H ^c   Naylor, Mary D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; MULTIHOSPITAL SYSTEM; NOMENCLATURE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS; HUMANS; MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878371937     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: 15390721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182942c3c     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(5):291-304.
2. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services. Health Information Technology: Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014.
3. Edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Fed Regist. 2012;77(171):54163-54292.
4. Institute ofMedicine; Grossmann C, Powers B,McGinnis JM, eds. Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care: Workshop Series Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
5. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, et al. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association white paper. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):1-9.
6. Neumann EK. Semantic harmonization: the power and limitation of ontologies. In: Alterovitz G, Ramoni M, eds. Knowledge-Based Bioinformatics: From Analysis to Interpretation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
7. Greenes RA. Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead. 1st ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2007.
8. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Levick D, et al. Improving Outcomes With Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society; 2012.
9. Carroll AE, Tarczy-Hornoch P, O'Reilly E, Christakis DA. Resident documentation discrepancies in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 pt 1):976-980.
10. Jefferies D, Johnson M, Griffiths R. A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16(2):112-124.
11. Samuels JG, Fetzer S. Pain management documentation quality as a reflection of nurses' clinical judgment. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009;24(3):223-231.
12. Jones SS, Koppel R, Ridgely MS, Palen TE,Wu S, HarrisonMI. Guide to Reducing Unintended Consequences of Electronic Health Records. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Reform; 2011.
13. Yu AC. Methods in biomedical ontology. J Biomed Inform. 2006;39(3):252-266.
14. SchuurmanN, Leszczynski A. Amethod tomap heterogeneity between near but non-equivalent semantic attributes in multiple health data registries. Health Inform J. 2008;14(1): 39-57.
15. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55.
16. Russ AL, Saleem JJ, Justice CF, Woodward-Hagg H, Woodbridge PA, Doebbeling BN. Electronic health information in use: characteristics that support employee workflow and patient care. Health Inform J. 2010;16(4):287-305.
17. Branson A,Hauer T, McClatchey R, Rogulin D, Shamdasani J. Adatamodel for integrating heterogeneousmedical data in the Health-E-Child Project. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008; 138:13-23.
18. Shi Y, Liu X, Xu Y, Ji Z. Semantic-based data integration model applied to heterogeneous medical information system. In: The 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University; 2010:624-628.
19. Chaudhuri S, Dayal U. An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 1997;26(1):65-74.
20. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. 2012. SNOMED CT. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/. Accessed November 12, 2012.
21. Healthcare Informatics. The vocabulary of interoperability: an interviewwithDr. Hon Pak, former U.S. ArmyCIO. Healthc Inform. 2012:53-54.
22. Martin KS. The Omaha System: A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
23. Saba VK. Nursing classifications: Home Health Care Classification System (HHCC): an overview. Online J Issues Nurs. 2002;7(3):9.
24. NANDA International. NANDA-I, NIC and NOC for Safe Patient Care. http://www.nanda.org/NNN.aspx. Accessed November 8, 2012.
25. World Health Organization. Workshop on semantic interoperability prerequisites for efficient e-health systems: initial considerations. Updated January 31, 2005. http://www.who .int/classifications/terminology/prerequisites. pdf. Accessed November 8, 2012.
26. American Association of Nurse Executives. AONE Guiding Principles for the Nurse Executive to Enhance Clinical Outcomes by Leveraging Technology. 2009. http://www.aone .org/resources/PDFs/AONE-GP-Leveraging-Technology.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2013.