A quantitative experimental study of wetting hysteresis on discrete and continuous chemical heterogeneities

Colloid and Polymer Science

Volumn 291, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 271-277

  Priest, Craig ^a   Sedev, Rossen ^a   Ralston, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chemical heterogeneity; Contact angle; Hysteresis; Patterns; Pinning

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL HETEROGENEITIES; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; HETEROGENEOUS SURFACE; PATTERNS; PINNING; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; RECEDING CONTACT LINES; SURFACE HETEROGENEITIES;

CONTACT ANGLE; HYSTERESIS; SLIP FORMING; STICK-SLIP;

WETTING;

ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYSTERESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY; WETTING HYSTERESIS;

EID: 84878365306     PISSN: 0303402X     EISSN: 14351536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2758-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil Trans R Soc London 95(1):65
2. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:547-551
3. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28(8):988
4. Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis I. Study of an idealized rough surface. Adv Chem Ser 43:112-135
5. Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surface. J Phys Chem 68:1744
6. Neumann AW, Good RJ (1972) Thermodynamics of contact angles I. Heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 38:341
7. Pease DC (1945) The significance of the contact angle in relation to the solid surface. J Phys Chem 49:107-110
8. Huh C, Mason SG (1977) Effects of surface roughness on wetting (theoretical). J Colloid Interface Sci 60(1):11
9. Oliver JF, Huh C, Mason SG (1997) Resistance to spreading of liquids by sharp edges. J Colloid Interface Sci 59(3):568
10. Joanny JF, de Gennes PG (1984) A model for contact angle hysteresis. J Chem Phys 81:552-562
11. Raphäel E, de Gennes PG (1989) Dynamics of wetting with nonideal surfaces. The single defect problem. J Chem Phys 90:7577
12. Marsh JA, Cazabat AM (1993) Dynamics of contact line depinning from a single defect. Phys Rev Lett 71:2433
13. Marsh JA, Cazabat AM (1993) Contact line distortion by non-wetting defects on a completely wetted vertical wall: an experimental study. Europhys Lett 23:45
14. McHale G, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2004) Contact-angle hysteresis on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20:10146
15. Priest C, Albrecht TWJ, Sedev R, Ralston J (2009) Asymmetric wetting hysteresis on hydrophobic microstructured surfaces. Langmuir 25(10):5655
16. Priest C, Sedev R, Ralston J (2007) Asymmetric wetting hysteresis on chemical defects. Phys Rev Lett 99:026103
17. Shanahan MER, Di Meglio JM (1994) Wetting hysteresis: effects due to shadowing. J Adhesion Sci Technol 8:1371
18. Shanahan MER (1991) A simple analysis of local wetting hysteresis on a Wilhelmy plate. Surf Interface Anal 17:489-495
19. Extrand CW (2003) Contact angles and hysteresis on surfaces with chemically heterogeneous islands. Langmuir 19:3793
20. Dorrer C, Rühe J (2006) Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. Langmuir 22:7652
21. Dorrer C, Rühe J (2007) Drops on microstructured surfaces coated with hydrophilic polymers: Wenzel's model and beyond. Langmuir 24:1959
22. Spori DM, Drobek T, Zürcher S, Ochsner M, Sprecher C, Mühlebach A, Spencer ND (2008) Beyond the Lotus effect: roughness influences on wetting over a wide surface energy range. Langmuir 24:5411-5417
23. Spori DM, Drobek T, Zürcher S, Spencer ND (2010) Cassie-state wetting investigated by mean of a hole-to-pillar density gradient. Langmuir 26:9465-9473
24. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 26:860
25. Fetzer R, Ralston J (2011) Exploring defect height and angle on asymmetric contact line pinning. J Phys Chem C 115(30):14907-14913. doi: 10.1021/jp203581j
26. Marmur A (1994) Contact angle hysteresis on heterogeneous smooth surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 168:40-46
27. Marmur A (2000) Wetting on real surfaces. J Imaging Sci Technol 44(5):406-409
28. Decker EL, Garoff S (1996) Using vibrational noise to probe energy barriers producing contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir 12(8):2100-2110
29. Nadkarni GD, Garoff S (1992) An investigation of microscopic aspects of contact angle hysteresis: pinning of the contact line on a single defect. Europhys Lett 20:523
30. Kanoufi K, Combellas C, Shanahan MER (2003) Wetting line behaviour on a locally surface treated poly(tetrafluoroethylene). Langmuir 19:6711
31. McHale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong? Langmuir 23(15):8200-8205. doi: 10.1021/la7011167
32. Marmur A, Bittoun E (2009) When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations. Langmuir 25(3):1277-1281
33. Bormashenko E (2009) A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25(18):10451-10454. doi: 10.1021/la902458t
34. Tarlov MJ, Burgess DRF Jr, Gillen G (1993) UV photopatterning of alkanethiolate monolayers self-assembled on gold and silver. J Am Chem Soc 115(12):5305-5306
35. Peters AM, Pirat C, Sbragaglia M, Borkent BM, Wessling M, Lohse D, Lammertink RGH (2009) Cassie-Baxter to Wenzel state wetting transition: scaling of the front velocity. Eur Phys J E 29(4):391-397