Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface

Colloid and Polymer Science

Volumn 291, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 391-399

  Chibowski, Emil ^a   Jurak, Malgorzata ^a  

^a MARIA CURIE SK ODOWSKA UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Contact angles hysteresis; DPPC monolayers; Solid support

Indexed keywords

1 ,2-DIPALMITOYL-SN-GLYCERO-3-PHOSPHOCHOLINE; ADVANCING AND RECEDING CONTACT ANGLES; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; CONTACT ANGLES HYSTERESIS; DPPC MONOLAYERS; INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; LIQUID PROPERTIES; SOLID SUPPORTS;

CONTACT ANGLE; DEPOSITS; ESTERS; LIQUID FILMS; MICA; MONOLAYERS; PROBES;

HYSTERESIS;

DIPALMITOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; FORMAMIDE; GLASS; METHANE; METHYLENE IODIDE; MICA; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERJAGUIN PRESSURE; HYSTERESIS; LIQUID; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84878344629     PISSN: 0303402X     EISSN: 14351536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2777-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bartel FE, Whitney CE (1932) Adhesion tension III. J Phys Chem 36:3115-3126
2. Adamson AW, Gast AP (1997) Physical chemistry of surfaces, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
3. Decker EL, Frank B, Suo Y, Garoff S (1999) Physics of contact angle measurement. Colloids Surf A 156:177-189. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00069-2
4. Gaydos J, Neumann AW (1994) The shapes of liquid menisci near heterogeneous walls and the effect of line tension on contact angle hysteresis. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 49:197-248. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(94)80016-2
5. Neumann AW (1974) Contact angles and their temperature dependence: thermodynamic status, measurement, interpretation and application. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 4:105-191. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(74)85001-3
6. Krumpfer JW, McCarthy TJ (2010) Contact angle hysteresis: a different view and a trivial recipe for low hysteresis hydrophobic surfaces. Faraday Discuss 146:103-111. doi: 10.1039/B925045J
7. Extrand CW (1998) A thermodynamic model for contact angle hysteresis. J Colloid Interface Sci 207:11-19. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5743
8. Lander LM, Siewierski LM, Brittain WJ, Vogler EA (1993) A systematic comparison of contact angle methods. Langmuir 9:2237-2239. doi: 10.1021/la00032a055
9. Höpken J, Möller M (1992) Low-surface-energy polystyrene. Macromolecules 25:1461-1467. doi: 10.1021/ma00031a016
10. Starov VM, Velarde MG (2009) Surface forces and wetting phenomena. J Phys Condens Matter 21:464121 (11 pp). doi: stacks.iop.org/JPhysCM/21/464121
11. Diaz ME, Fuentes J, Cerro RL, Savage MD (2010) Hysteresis during contact angles measurement. J Colloid Interface Sci 343:574-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.11.055
12. Chibowski E (2002) Contact angle hysteresis due to a film present behind the drop. In: Mittal KL (ed) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion, vol 2, part 2. VSP, Utrecht, pp 265-288
13. Chibowski E (2007) On some relations between advancing, receding and Young's contact angles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 133:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.03.002
14. Fadeev YA, McCarthy TJ (1999) Trialkylsilane monolayers covalently attached to silicon surfaces: wettability studies indicating that molecular topography contributes to contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir 15:3759-3766. doi: 10.1021/la981486o
15. Chibowski E (2005) Surface free energy and wettability of silyl layers on silicon determined from contact angle hysteresis. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 113:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2005.01.005
16. Chibowski E (2011) Apparent surface free energy of superhydrophobic surfaces. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:1323-1336. doi: 10.1163/016942411X555890
17. Jurak M, Chibowski E (2006) Topography and surface free energy of DPPC layers deposited on a glass, mica, or PMMA support. Langmuir 22:7226-7234. doi: 10.1021/la060585w
18. www.nanotec.es (2012)
19. van Oss CJ, Wu W, Docoslis A, Giese RF (2001) The interfacial tensions with water and the Lewis acid-base surface tension parameters of polar organic liquids derived from their aqueous solubilities. Colloids Surf B 20:87-91. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7765(00)00169-7
20. Marmur A (2010) A guide to the equilibrium contact angles maze. In: Mittal KL (ed) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion, vol 6. Brill, Leiden, pp 3-18
21. Chibowski E, Ontiveros-Ortega A, Perea-Carpio R (2002) On the interpretation of contact angle hysteresis. J Adhes Sci Technol 16:1367-1404. doi: 10.1163/156856102320252859
22. van Oss CJ, Giese RF, Wu W (1997) On the predominant electron-donicity of polar solid surfaces. J Adhes 63:71-88. doi: 10.1080/00218469708015214
23. Radelczuk H, Holysz L, Chibowski E (2002) Comparison of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base and contact angle hysteresis approaches for determination of solid surface free energy. J Adhes Sci Technol 16:1547-1568. doi: 10.1163/15685610260255215
24. Cross B, Steinberger A, Cottin-Bizonne C, Rieu J-P, Charlaix E (2006) Boundary flow of water on supported phospholipid films. Europhys Lett 73:390-395. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2005-10416-4
25. Meyer EE, Rosenberg KJ, Israelachvili J (2006) Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15739-15746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606422103