Playing God and the Intrinsic Value of Life: Moral Problems for Synthetic Biology?

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 435-448

  Link, Hans Jürgen ^a,b  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b Department of Philosophy of the University at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial life; Intrinsic value of life; Playing God; Slippery slope; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878342151     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9353-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ball, P. (2011). Unnatural. The heretical idea of making people. London: The Bodley Head.
2. Bhutkar, A. (2005). Synthetic biology. Navigating the challenges ahead. The Journal of Biolaw & Business, 8(2), 19-29.
3. Boldt, J., Maio, G., & Müller, O. (2009). Synthetische Biologie. Eine ethisch-philosophische Analyse. Zürich, Switzerland: EKAH.
4. Calvert, J., & Tait, J. (2008). Conecpt note: Synthetic Biology. Risks and opportunities of an emerging field. Geneva, Switzerland: International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (This report was updated 2010: http://www. irgc. org/IMG/pdf/irgc_SB_final_07jan_web. pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2011).
5. Dabrock, P. (2009). Playing god? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 3, 47-54.
6. de Vriend, H. (2006). Constructing Life. Early social reflections on the emerging field of synthetic biology. The Hague, the Netherlands: Rathenau Institute. Working Document 97.
7. Grunwald, A. (2010). From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. Nanoethics, 4(2), 91-101.
8. Habermas, J. (2001). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt A. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.
9. Highfield, R. (2006). Ripped genes. The Daily Telegraph, 27 May. http://www. edge. org/3rd_culture/highfield06/highfield06_index. html. Accessed 25 Sep 2011.
10. Kant, I. (1793). Die Metaphysik der Sitten (cited as GMS). Berlin, Germany: Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, AA 06.
11. Kessler, H. (2008). Kreative Schöpfung-Kreativität Gottes. Überlegungen zum Spannungsfeld von Schöpfung und Evolution. In J. Klose & J. Oehler (Eds.), Gott oder Darwin? (pp. 27-58). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
12. Lauritzen, P. (2001). Cloning and the future of human embryo research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Merkel, R. (2003). Contra Speziesargument. Zum normativen Status des Embryos und zum Schutz der Ethik gegen ihre biologistische Degradierung. In G. Damschen & D. Schönecker (Eds.), Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen (pp. 35-58). Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: de Gruyter.
14. Nerlich, B., Elliott, R., & Larson, B. (Eds.). (2009). Communicating biological sciences. Ethical and metaphorical dimensions. Farnham, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
15. NEST High-Level Expert Group. (2005). Synthetic biology. applying engineering to biology. ftp://ftp. cordis. europa. eu/pub/nest/docs/syntheticbiology_b5_eur21796_en. pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2011.
16. Parens, E., Johnston, J., & Moses, J. (2009). Ethical issues in synthetic biology: An overview of the debates. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
17. Peters, T. (2003). Playing God. Genetic determinism and human freedom (2nd ed.). New York, NY/London, UK: Routledge.
18. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://www. vatican. va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en. html. Accessed 25 Sep 2011.
19. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. (2010). New directions. The ethics of synthetic biology and emerging technologies. Washington, DC. http://bioethics. gov/cms/sites/default/files/PCSBI-Synthetic-Biology-Report-12. 16. 10. pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2011.
20. Preston, C. J. (2008). Synthetic biology. Drawing a line in Darwin's sand. Environmental Values, 17, 23-39.
21. Sandel, M. J. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, MA/London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
22. SYNTH-ETHICS. (2009). Identification of ethical issues and analysis of public discourse. http://www. synthethics. eu/documents/REPORT%20WP1%20synthethics%20-%20ethics+public%20discourse. pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2011.
23. van den Belt, H. (2009). Playing God in Frankenstein's footsteps: Synthetic biology and the meaning of life. Nanoethics, 3(3), 257-268.
24. Yolton, J. (1983). Thinking matter. Materialism in eighteenth-century Britain. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.