Immediate post-implantation skin immobilization decreases skin regression around percutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic implant systems

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101 A, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2075-2082

  Holt, Brian Mueller ^a,b   Bachus, Kent N ^a,b,c   Beck, James Peter ^a,b   Bloebaum, Roy Drake ^a,b   Jeyapalina, Sujee ^a,b  

^a Salt Lake City Hlth Care S   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Utah   (United States)

Author keywords

osseointegration; percutaneous implant; skin; surface topography; wound healing

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION; IMPLANTATION MODELS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERCUTANEOUS DEVICES; POROUS COATED SURFACE; QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE COVERAGES; WOUND HEALING;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SKIN; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TISSUE REGENERATION;

PROSTHETICS;

AMPUTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DERMATOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS OSSEOINTEGRATED PROSTHESIS; POROSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEEP; SKIN IMMOBILIZATION; SKIN REGRESSION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

ALLOYS; AMPUTATION; ANIMALS; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; IMMOBILIZATION; INTERFEROMETRY; KINETICS; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHEEP; SKIN; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84878328282     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34510     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lyon CC, Kulkami J, Zimerson R, Van Ross E, Beck MH,. Skin disorders in amputees. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 501-507.
2. Dudek NL, Marks MD, Marshall SC, Chardon JP,. Dermatologic conditions associated with use of a lower-extremity prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 659-663.
3. Koc E, Tunca M, Akar A, Hakan Erbil A, Demiralp B, Arca E,. Skin problems in amputees: A descriptive study. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: 463-466.
4. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R,. Estimating the prevalance of limb loss in the united states: 2005-2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 422-429.
5. Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU,. Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 74-81.
6. Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Uden M, Branemark R,. Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: Hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29: 153-163.
7. Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Jonsson S, Rydevik B, Branemark R,. Osseoperception and osseointegrated prosthetic limbs. In:, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, editors. Psychoprosthetics, 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p 131-140.
8. Grosse-Siestrup C, Affeld K,. Design criteria for percutaneous devices. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 357-382.
9. Paquay YCGJ, de Ruijter JE, van der Waerden JPCM, Jansen JA,. Tissue reaction to Dacron velour and titanium fibre mesh used for anchorage of percutaneous devices. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1251-1256.
10. Pendegrass CJ, Goodship AE, Blunn GW,. Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4183-4191.
11. Brånemark P-I, Chien S, Gröndahl H-G, Robinson K,. The Osseointegration Book. From Calvarium to Calcaneus, 1st ed. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH; 2005. p 494.
12. Aschoff HH, Clausen A, Hoffmeister T,. The endo-exo femur prosthesis-A new concept of bone-guided, prosthetic rehabilitation following above-knee amputation. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147: 610-615.
13. Kang NV, Pendegrass C, Marks L, Blunn G,. Osseocutaneous integration of an intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis implant used for reconstruction of a transhumeral amputee: Case report. J Hand Surg 2010; 35: 1130-1134.
14. Jeyapalina S, Beck JP, Bachus KN, Williams DL, Bloebaum RD,. Efficacy of a porous-structured titanium subdermal barrier for preventing infection in percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 1304-1311.
15. Checketts RG, MacEachern AG, Otterburn M,. Pin track infection and the principles of pin site care. In:, De Bastiani G, Apley AG, Goldberg AAJ, editors. Orthofix External Fixation in Trauma and Orthopaedics, 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 2000. p 97-103.
16. Emmanual J, Hornbeck C, Bloebaum RD,. A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol 1987; 62: 401-10.
17. Mooney V, Harvey JP, McBride E, Snelson R,. Skeletal extension of limb prosthetic attachments-problems in tissue reaction. J Biomed Mater Res 1971; 5: 143-159.
18. Mooney V, Schwartz SA, Roth AM, Gorniowsky MJ,. Percutaneous implant devices. Ann Biomed Eng 1977; 5: 34-46.
19. Von Recum AF,. Applications and failure modes of percutaneous devices: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 323-336.
20. Stalfors J, Tjellström A,. Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: A comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA deramtome. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 1109-1114.
21. Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, de Rooy JWJ, Hol MKS, Cremers CWRJ, Mylanus EAM,. Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions. Arch Otolaryngol 2009; 135: 742-747.
22. Winter GD,. Transcutaneous implants-Reactions of skin-implant interface. J Biomed Mater Res 1974; 8: 99-113.
23. Ingber DE,. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med 2003; 35: 564-577.
24. Katsumi A, Orr AW, Tzima E, Schwartz MA,. Integrins in Mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 12001-12004.
25. Matthews BD, Overby DR, Mannix R, Ingber DE,. Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: Role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. J Cell Sci 2005; 119: 508-518.
26. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J,. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2009; 10: 63-73.
27. Wong VW, Akaishi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC,. Pushing back: Wound mechanostransduction in repair and regeneration. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 2186-2196.
28. Holt B, Tripathi A, Morgan J,. Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear. J Biomech 2008; 41: 2689-2695.
29. Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, Pendegrass CJ, Yeadon R, Ring M, Goodship AE, Blunn GW,. Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP) for limb salvage in 4 dogs. Vet Surg 2011; 1-17.