Instream flows and “angler habitat:” Flow effects on fishability on eight pacific northwest rivers

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 343-357

  Whittaker, Doug ^a   Shelby, Bo ^b   Abrams, Jesse ^c  

^a Confluence Research and Consulting ^*  (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Angler habitat; Fishability; Fishing; Instream flow; Norms; Recreation habitat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878321619     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200600894951     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aas, O., Haider, W., and Hunt, L., 2000. Angler responses to harvest regulations in Engerdal, Norway:A conjoint based choice modeling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20:940–950.
2. Brown, T. C., Taylor, J. G., and Shelby, B., 1991. Assessing the direct effects of recreation on streamflow:A literature review. Water Resources Bulletin, 27 (6):979–989.
3. Carlson, J. L., and Palmer, S. C., 1997. Effects of a change in streamflows on recreation use values:An application of benefits transfer. Rivers, 6 (1):32–42.
4. Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L., Connelly, N. A., Enck, J. W., Pomerantz, G. A., Purdy, K. G., and Siemer, F. W., 1992. “ Toward a comprehensive paradigm of wildlife management:Integrating the human and biophysical dimensions ”. In American fish and wildlife policy:The human dimension, Edited by:Mangun, W. R., 33–54. Carbondale:Southern Illinois Press.
5. Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L., Vaske, J. J., and Manfredo, M. J., 2004. “ Human dimensions of wildlife management ”. In Society and natural resources:A summary of knowledge, Edited by:Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Bruyere, B. L., Field, D. R., and Brown, P. J., 187–198. Jefferson, MO:Modern Litho.
6. Ditton, R. B., 2004. “ Human dimensions of fisheries ”. In Society and natural resources:A summary of knowledge, Edited by:Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Bruyere, B. L., Field, D. R., and Brown, P. J., 199–208. Jefferson, MO:Modern Litho.
7. Duffield, J. W., Brown, T. C., and Allen, S. D., 1994. Economic value of instream flow in Montana's Big Hole and Bitterroot rivers Fort Collins, CO U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper RM-317
8. Fedler, A. J., and Ditton, R. B., 1994. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19 (4):6–12.
9. Gillis, K. S., and Ditton, R. B., 2002. A conjoint analysis of the U. S. Atlantic billfish fishery management alternatives. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 22:218–228.
10. Hill, M. T., Platts, W. S., and Beschta, R. L., 1991. Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out-of-channel flow requirements. Rivers, 2 (3):198–210.
11. Hunt, K. M., and Ditton, R. B., 1997. The social context of site selection for freshwater fishing. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17:331–338.
12. Johnson, N. S., and Adams, R. M., 1988. Benefits of streamflow:The case of the John Day River steelhead fishery. Water Resources Research, 24 (1):1839–1846.
13. Kennedy, J. J., and Thomas, J. W., 1995. “ Managing natural resources as social value ”. In A new century for natural resources management, Edited by:Knight, R. L., and Bates, S. F., 311–322. Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
14. Knopf, R. C., Driver, B. L., and Bassett, J. R., 1973. Motivations for fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 38:191–203.
15. Loomis, J., Sorg, C., and Donnelly, D., 1986. Economic losses to recreational fisheries due to small-head hydro-power development:A case study of the Henry's Fork in Idaho. Journal of Environmental Management, 22:85–94.
16. McMichael, G. A., and Kaya, C. M., 1991. Relations among stream temperature, angling success for rainbow trout and brown trout, and fisherman satisfaction. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 11:190–199.
17. Narayanan, R., 1986. Evaluation of recreational benefits of instream flows. Journal of Leisure Research, 18 (2):116–128.
18. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., and Braun, D. P., 1997. How much water does a river need?. Freshwater Biology, 37:231–249.
19. Shelby, B., Brown, T. C., and Baumgartner, R., 1992. Effects of streamflows on river trips in Grand Canyon, Arizona. Rivers, 3 (3):191–201.
20. Shelby, B., Brown, T. C., and Taylor, J. G., 1992. Streamflow and recreation Fort Collins, CO USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-209, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
21. Shelby, B., and Heberlein, T. A., 1986. Carrying capacity in recreation settings, Corvallis:Oregon State University Press.
22. Shelby, B., and Jackson, B., 1991. Determining minimum boating flows from hydrologic data:Review of “A method for determining instream flows for recreational boating” by Roger Corbett. Rivers, 2 (2):161–167.
23. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J., and Donnelly, M. P., 1996. Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18:103–123.
24. Shelby, B., Whittaker, D., and Brown, M., 2002. River level issues in the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Technical Report E.5–7 prepared for Idaho Power Corporation for inclusion in technical documents associated with FERC Draft License Application for the Hells Canyon Complex
25. Shelby, B., and Whittaker, D., 1994. Recreation streamflow assessment, North Umpqua River Report prepared for EDAW, Inc., Seattle, Washington as part of technical documents submitted by PacifiCorp to FERC as part of a Final License Application
26. Shelby, B., and Whittaker, D., 2001. United States' expert report disclosing methodologies for quantification of Idaho Wild and Scenic River claims for recreation in the Snake River Basin Adjudication Draft analysis, results, and reports prepared for US Forest Service and Department of Justice
27. Shelby, B., and Whittaker, D., 2003. Recreation flow analysis:Upper Klamath River Report prepared for PacifiCorp for inclusion in technical documents associated with FERC Final License Application
28. Shelby, B., Whittaker, D., and Hansen, W. R., 1997. Streamflow effects on hiking in Zion National Park, Utah. Rivers, 6 (2):80–93.
29. Shelby, B., Whittaker, D., and Roppe, J., 1998. Controlled flow studies for recreation:A case study of Oregon's North Umpqua River. Rivers, 6 (4):259–268.
30. Stevens, J. B., Adams, R. M., Barkley, D., Kiest, L. W., Landry, C. J., Newton, L. D., Obermiller, F. W., Perry, G. M., Seely, H., Turner, B. P., Li, H. W., and Walks, D. J., 2000. Benefits, costs, and local impacts of market-based streamflow enhancements:The Deschutes River, Oregon. Rivers, 7 (2):89–108.
31. Tennant, D. L., 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation, and related environmental resources. Fisheries, 1 (4):6–10.
32. Tharme, R. E., 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment:Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19:397–441.
33. Vaske, J. J., and Whittaker, D., 2004. “ Normative approaches to natural resources ”. In Society and natural resources:A summary of knowledge, Edited by:Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Bruyere, B. L., Field, D. R., and Brown, P. J., 283–294. Jefferson, Missouri:Modern Litho.
34. Whittaker, D., and Shelby, B., 2001. Flow assessment for recreation:Pit 3, 4, and 5 hydroelectric project, Report prepared for Pacific Gas and Electric for inclusion in technical documents associated with FERC Draft License Application.
35. Whittaker, D., and Shelby, B., 2002. Evaluating instream flows for recreation:Applying the structural norm approach to biophysical conditions. Leisure Sciences, 24:363–374.
36. Whittaker, D., Shelby, B., and Gangemi, J., 2005. Flows and recreation:A guide to studies for river professionals, Portland, OR:Hydropower Reform Coalition and National Park Service Hydropower Recreation Assistance Program.
37. Whittaker, D., Shelby, B., Jackson, W., and Beschta, R., 1993. Instream flows for recreation:A handbook on concepts and research methods, Anchorage, AK:U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service.
38. Willis, K. G., and Garrod, G. D., 1999. Angling and recreation values of low-flow alleviation in rivers. Journal of Environmental Management, 57 (2):71–83.