Identification of the variables associated with pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in the era of periprostatic nerve block: The role of transrectal probe configuration

BJU International

Volumn 111, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1281-1286

  Moussa, Ayman S ^a   El Shafei, Ahmed ^a   Diaz, Ed ^a   Gao, Tianming ^a   Zaytoun, Osama M ^a   Fareed, Khaled ^a   Ulchaker, James C ^a   Jones, J Stephen ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

anaesthesia; biopsy; pain score; probe

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL PROBE; NEEDLE GUIDE; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTATIC NERVE BLOCK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE SIZE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSRECTAL PROBE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECTUM;

EID: 84878315345     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11689.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 546-551 (Pubitemid 41278578)
2. Autorino R, De Sio M, Di Lorenzo G, et al. How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. J Urol 2005; 174: 2091-2097 (Pubitemid 41611744)
3. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J,. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 608-610 (Pubitemid 28321106)
4. Zisman A, Leibovich D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A,. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety, and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2001; 165: 445-454 (Pubitemid 32060434)
5. Rodriguez A, Kyriakou G, Leray E, Lobel B, Guillé F,. Prospective study comparing two methods of anaesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: review of the literature. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 195-200 (Pubitemid 36917003)
6. Obek C, Ozkan B, Tunc B, Can G, Yalcin V, Solok V,. Comparison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2004; 172: 502-505 (Pubitemid 38900189)
7. Chopra S, Rowe EW, Laniado M, Patel A,. A prospective study analysing the effect of pain on probe insertion, and the biopsy strategy, on the patients' perception of pain during TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate. N Z Med J 2008; 121: 39-43
8. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD,. Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol 2002; 168: 2108-2110
9. Soloway MS, Obek C,. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000; 163: 172-173
10. Scattoni V, Maccagnano C, Zanni G, et al. Is extended and saturation biopsy necessary? Int J Urol 2010; 17: 447-449
11. Jones JS, Ulchaker JC, Nelson D, et al. Periprostatic local anesthesia eliminates pain of office-based transrectal prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2003; 6: 53-55 (Pubitemid 36432621)
12. Naughton CK, Ornstein DK, Smith DS, et al. Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial of 6 versus 12 cores. J Urol 2000; 163: 168-171
13. Ching CB, Moussa AS, Li J, Lane BR, Zippe C, Jones JS,. Does transrectal ultrasound probe configuration really matter? End fire versus side fire probe prostate cancer detection rates. J Urol 2009; 181: 2077-2082
14. Ecke TH, Gerullis H, Heuck CJ, et al. Does a new ultrasound probe change the complication rates of transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsies of the prostate? Anticancer Res 2010; 30: 3071-3076
15. Akan H, Yildiz O, Dalva I, Yücesoy C,. Comparison of two periprostatic nerve blockade techniques for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: bilateral basal injection and single apical injection. Urology 2009; 73: 23-26
16. Bhomi KK, Lim HH, Consigliere DT, Tiong HY,. Control of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective study comparing two methods. Urol Int 2007; 79: 332-335 (Pubitemid 350136520)
17. Montoliu García A, Juan Escudero J, Ramos de Campos M, et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of lidocaine local anesthesia in prostate biopsy. Arch Esp Urol 2009; 62: 339-347
18. Luján Marco S, Bango García V, Arlandis Guzmán S, et al. Comparative study between analgesic efficacy and safetyof meperidine compared with lidocaine periprostatic infiltration in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Actas Urol Esp 2009; 33: 30-34
19. Visapää H, Taari K,. Combination of paracetamol, codeine and lidocaine for pain relief during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 55-57
20. Bingqian L, Peihuan L, Yudong W, et al. Intraprostatic local anesthesia with periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2009; 182: 479-483
21. Giannarini G, Autorino R, Valent F, et al. Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2009; 181: 585-591, discussion 591-3
22. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS,. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166: 2178-2180 (Pubitemid 33065251)
23. Djavan B, Waldert M, Zlotta A, et al. Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. J Urol 2001; 166: 856-860 (Pubitemid 32750966)