Preoperative planning for endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Feasibility of nonenhanced MR angiography versus contrast-enhanced CT angiography

Radiology

Volumn 267, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 948-955

  Goshima, Satoshi ^a   Kanematsu, Masayuki ^a   Kondo, Hiroshi ^a   Kawada, Hiroshi ^a   Kojima, Toshihisa ^a   Sakurai, Kota ^a   Watanabe, Haruo ^a   Shimabukuro, Katsuya ^a   Matsuno, Yukihiro ^a   Ishida, Narihiro ^a   Takemura, Hirofumi ^a   Bae, Kyongtae T ^b  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL STENT; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RENAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84878307468     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121557     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Drott C, Arfvidsson B, Ortenwall P, Lundholm K. Age-standardized incidence of ruptured aortic aneurysm in a defined Swedish population between 1952 and 1988: mortality rate and operative results. Br J Surg 1992;79(2):175-179.
2. Blum U, Langer M, Spillner G, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: preliminary technical and clinical results with transfemoral placement of endovascular self-expanding stent-grafts. Radiology 1996;198(1):25-31. (Pubitemid 26008233)
3. Thurnher SA, Dorffner R, Thurnher MM, et al. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997;205(2):341-352.
4. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Debatin JF. Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1999;211(3):693-697. (Pubitemid 29249465)
5. Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM, Su LD, Gupta S, LeBoit PE. Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 2000;356(9234):1000-1001.
6. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, Heaf JG, Thomsen HS. Case-control study of gadodiamide-related nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22(11):3174-3178. (Pubitemid 350202540)
7. Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003;227(3):809-816. (Pubitemid 36583041)
8. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
9. Miyazaki M, Isoda H. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen. Eur J Radiol 2011;80(1):9-23.
10. Herborn CU, Watkins DM, Runge VM, Gendron JM, Montgomery ML, Naul LG. Renal arteries: comparison of steady-state free precession MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2006;239(1):263-268.
11. Greenberg JI, Dorsey C, Dalman RL, et al. Long-term results after accessory renal artery coverage during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2012;56(2):291-296.
12. Atanasova IP, Kim D, Lim RP, et al. Non-contrast MR angiography for comprehensive assessment of abdominopelvic arteries using quadruple inversion-recovery preconditioning and 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33(6):1430-1439.
13. Takei N, Miyoshi M, Kabasawa H. Non-contrast MR angiography for supraaortic arteries using inflow enhanced inversion recovery fast spin echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35(4):957-962.
14. Storey P, Lim RP, Kim S, Stoffel DR, Lee VS. Arterial flow characteristics in the presence of vascular disease and implications for fast spin echo-based noncontrast MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34(6):1472-1479.
15. Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 1993;328(16):1167-1172.
16. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363(9406):345- 351. (Pubitemid 38169539)
17. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(7):1393-1399. (Pubitemid 39303939)