Do ecological differences between taxonomic groups influence the relationship between species' distributions and climate? A global meta-analysis using species distribution models

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 657-664

  Kharouba, Heather M ^a   Mccune, Jenny L ^a   Thuiller, Wilfried ^b   Huntley, Brian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE EFFECT; DISPERSAL; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; META-ANALYSIS; POPULATION MODELING;

EID: 84878300310     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07683.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Angert A. L. et al. 2011. Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? Ecol. Lett. 14: 677-689.
2. Araújo M. B. and Pearson R. G. 2005. Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecography 28: 693-695.
3. Araújo M. B. et al. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 11: 1504-1513.
4. Beerling D. J. et al. 1995. Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 269-282.
5. Blach-Overgaard A. et al. 2010. Determinants of palm species distributions across Africa: the relative roles of climate, non-climatic environmental factors, and spatial constraints. Ecography 33: 380-391.
6. Brown J. H. 1995. Macroecology. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
7. Brown J. H. et al. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 597-623.
8. Diamond S. E. et al. 2011. Species' traits predict phenological responses to climate change in butterflies. Ecology 92: 1005-1012.
9. Elith J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
10. Fielding A. H. and Bell J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
11. Gaston K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges, 1st ed. - Oxford Univ. Press.
12. Good R. D.O. 1931. A theory of plant geography. New Phytol. 30: 149-171.
13. Graham C. H. et al. 2010. Evaluating the potential causes of range limits of birds of the Colombian Andes. J. Biogeogr. 37: 1863-1875.
14. Guisan A. and Zimmermann N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135: 147-186.
15. Guisan A. and Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8: 993-1009.
16. Guisan A. et al. 2007. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers. Distrib. 13: 332-340.
17. Hampe A. 2004. Bioclimatic models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 469-471.
18. Hanspach J. et al. 2011. Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 779-788.
19. Huntley B. et al. 2004. The performance of models relating species geographical distributions to climate is independent of trophic level. Ecol. Lett. 7: 417-426.
20. Huntley B. et al. 2006. Potential impacts of climatic change upon geographical distributions of birds. Ibis 148: 8-28.
21. Huntley B. et al. 2008. Potential impacts of climatic change on European breeding birds. PLoS One 3: e1439.
22. Hutchinson G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20: 415-427.
23. Lester S. E. et al. 2007. The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecol. Lett. 10: 745-758.
24. Lobo J. M. et al. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 145-151.
25. Luoto M. et al. 2005. Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 575-584.
26. Luoto M. et al. 2007. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 34-42.
27. McPherson J. M. et al. 2004. The effects of species' range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 811-823.
28. Merriam C. H. 1894. Laws of temperature control of the geographic distribution of terrestrial animals and plants. Nat. Geogr. 6: 229-238.
29. Paul J. R. et al. 2009. Evolutionary time for dispersal limits the extent but not the occupancy of species' potential ranges in the tropical plant genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). Am. Nat. 173: 188-199.
30. Pearce J. and Ferrier S. 2000. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 128: 127-147.
31. Poyry J. et al. 2008. Species traits are associated with the quality of bioclimatic models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 403-414.
32. Pulliam H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol. Lett. 3: 349-361.
33. Randin C. F. et al. 2006. Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? J. Biogeogr. 33: 1689-1703.
34. Santika T. 2011. Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 181-192.
35. Segurado P. et al. 2006. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 433-444.
36. Skaug H. et al. 2012. glmmADMB: generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package ver. 0.7.2.12.
37. Swets J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
38. Syphard A. D. and Franklin J. 2010. Species traits affect the performance of species distribution models for plants in southern California. J. Veg. Sci. 21: 177-189.
39. Thuiller W. et al. 2004. Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron taxa. Ecology 85: 1688-1699.
40. Tsoar A. et al. 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence- only methods for modeling species distribution. Divers. Distrib. 13: 397-405.
41. van Riper C. et al. 1986. The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 327-344.
42. Wiens J. J. 2011. The niche, large-scale biogeography, and species interactions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366: 2336-2350.
43. Wisz M. S. et al. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 14: 763-773.