Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion in persons with impaired hearing

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 254-257

  Grant, Ken W ^a   Walden, Brian E ^a   Van Summers, ^a   Leek, Marjorie R ^b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR REHABILITATIVE AUDITORY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COGNITIVE DEFECT; EDITORIAL; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SUPRATHRESHOLD DISTORTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HEARING; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84878292284     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.2     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute. ( 1997) ANSI S3.6-1997 American National Standard: Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index . NewYork: AmericanNational Standards Institute.
2. Buss EH, Hall JW 3rd, Grose JH. ( 2004) Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 25( 3): 242-250.
3. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Johnson J, Rivera I. ( 2011) Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues. EarHear 32( 3): 339-348.
4. Edwards B. ( 2007) The future of hearing aid technology. Trends Amplif 11( 1): 31-45.
5. Festen JM, Plomp R. ( 1990) Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 88( 4): 1725-1736.
6. Gatehouse S. ( 1994) Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 15( 1): 30-49.
7. Horst JW. ( 1987) Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82( 3): 874-885.
8. Humes LE. ( 2008) Aging and speech communication. ASHA Lead 13: 10-13, 33.
9. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Humes AC. (2003) Examination of differences between successful and unsuccessful elderly hearing aid candidates matched for age, hearing loss and gender. Int J Audiol 42(7):432-441. (Pubitemid 37322640)
10. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). ( 2003) 60268-16 SOUND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT - Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission.
11. Killion MC, Niquette PA. ( 2000) What can the pure-tone audiogram tell us about the patient's SNR loss? Hear J 53: 46-53.
12. Kochkin S. ( 2009) MarkeTrak VIII: 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hear Rev 16: 12-31.
13. Kochkin S. ( 2010) MarkeTrak VIII: customer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J 63: 11-19.
14. Lee LW, Humes LE. (1993) Evaluating a speech-reception threshold model for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 93(5):2879-2885. (Pubitemid 23143514)
15. Lunner T, Sundewall-Thorén E. (2007) Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 18(7):604-617. (Pubitemid 351175762)
16. Nelson P, Hornsby B, Moore B, Trine T. ( 2007) Understanding individual differences in aided speech recognition and hearing aid success. Hear Rev 14: 30-33.
17. Pichora-Fuller K. ( 2009) How cognition might influence hearing aid design, fitting, and outcomes. Hear J 62: 32-38.
18. Plomp R. ( 1978) Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 63( 2): 533-549.
19. Plomp R. ( 1986) A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 29( 2): 146-154.
20. Rankovic CM. ( 1998) Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 103( 2): 1043-1057.
21. Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T, Zekveld AA. ( 2010) When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health 12( 49): 263-269.
22. Smoorenburg GF. ( 1992) Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am 91( 1): 421-437.
23. Walden TC, Walden BE. ( 2004) Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living. J Am Acad Audiol 15( 5): 342-352.