The dance of male anopheles gambiae in wild mating swarms

Journal of Medical Entomology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 552-559

  Butail, Sachit ^a   Manoukis, Nicholas C ^b   Diallo, Moussa ^c   Ribeiro, José M C ^d   Paley, Derek A ^e  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BAMAKO   (Mali)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Anopheles gambiae; autocorrelation; swarming

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANOPHELES GAMBIAE; ARTICLE; MALE; MALI; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; WIND;

ANIMALS; ANOPHELES GAMBIAE; MALE; MALI; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; WIND;

ANOPHELES GAMBIAE;

EID: 84878289346     PISSN: 00222585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/ME12251     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ballerini, M., N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, et al. 2008. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a eld study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105: 1232-1237. (Pubitemid 351397036)
2. Banas, N. S., D. P. Wang, and J. Yen. 2004. Experimental validation of an individual-based model for zooplankton swarming. Handbook of scaling methods in aquatic ecology measurement, Analysis, Simulation 161-180.
3. Berman, S., Q. Lindsey, M. S. Sakar, V. Kumar, and S. C. Pratt. 2011. Experimental study and modeling of group retrieval in ants as an approach to collective transport in swarm robotic systems. Proc. IEEE 99: 1470-1481.
4. Bouguet, J.-Y. 2010. Camera calibration toolbox for Matlab. (http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib-doc/index.html).
5. Brown, R. G. 1983. Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman ltering. John Wiley & Sons,NewYork, NY.
6. Butail, S., N. C. Manoukis, M. Diallo, J.M.C. Ribeiro, T. Lehmann, and D. A. Paley. 2012. Reconstructing the ßight kinematics of swarming and mating in wild mosquitoes. J. R. Soc. Interface 9: 2624-2638. doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0150.
7. Cavagna, A., A. Cimarelli, I. Giardina, G. Parisi, R. Santagati, F. Stefanini, and M. Viale. 2010. Scale-free correlations in starling ßocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107: 11865-11870.
8. Charlwood, J. D., J. Pinto, C. A. Sousa, H. Madsen, C. Ferreira, and V. E. do Rosario. 2002. The swarming and mating behaviour of Anopheles gambiae Ss (Diptera: Culicidae) from Sao Tome Island. J. Vector Ecol. 27: 178-183. (Pubitemid 135748618)
9. Couzin, I. D., J. Krause, R. James, G. D. Ruxton, and N. R. Franks. 2002. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J. Theor. Biol. 218: 1-11. (Pubitemid 35217564)
10. Diabate, A., A. S. Yaro, A. Dao, M. Diallo, D. L. Huestis, and T. Lehmann. 2011. Spatial distribution and male mating success of Anopheles Gambiae swarms. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 184. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-184.
11. Diabate, A, A. Dao, A. S. Yaro, A. Adamou, R. Gonzalez, N. C. Manoukis, S. F. Traore, R. W. Gwadz, and T. Lehmann. 2009. Spatial swarm segregation and reproductive isolation between the molecular forms of Anopheles Gambiae. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 4215-4222. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1167.
12. Favia, G., A. della Torre, M. Bagayoko, A. Lanfrancotti, N. Sagnon, Y. T. Toure, and M. Coluzzi. 1997. Molecular identication of sympatric chromosomal forms of Anopheles Gambiae and further evidence of their reproductive isolation. Insect Mol. Biol. 6: 377-383. (Pubitemid 27452952)
13. Forgoston, E., and I. B. Schwartz. 2008. Delay-induced instabilities in self-propelling swarms. Phys. Rev. E 77. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.035203. (Pubitemid 351442117)
14. Gibson, G. 1985. Swarming behaviour of the mosquito Culex pipiens Quinquefasciatus: a quantitative analysis. Physiol. Entomol. 10: 283-296. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1985.tb00049.x.
15. Grunbaum, D. 1994. Translating stochastic density-dependent individual behavior with sensory constraints to an Eulerian model of animal swarming. J. Math. Biol. 33: 139-161. doi:10.1007/BF00160177.
16. Ikawa, T., H. Okabe, T. Mori, K. Urabe, and T. Ikeshoji. 1994. A method for reconstructing three-dimensional positions of swarming mosquitoes. J. Insect Behav. 7: 237-248. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01990084. (Pubitemid 2064636)
17. Lee, C. T., M. F. Hoopes, and J. Diehl. 2001. Non-local concepts and models in biology. J. Theor. Biol. 210: 201-219. (Pubitemid 32575062)
18. Manoukis, N. C., A. Diabate, A. Abdoulaye, M. Diallo, A. Dao, A. S. Yaro, J.M.C. Ribeiro, and T. Lehmann. 2009. Structure and dynamics of male swarms of Anopheles Gambiae. J. Med. Entomol. 46: 227-235. doi:10.1603/033.046.0207.
19. Mogilner, A., and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 1999. A non-local model for a swarm. J. Math. Biol. 38: 534-570. doi:10.1007/s002850050158.
20. Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright. 1999. Numerical optimization. Springer, New York, NY.
21. Okubo, A. 1986. Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, ßocks, and herds. Adv. Biophys. 22: 1-94. doi:10.1016/0065-227X(86)90003- 1.
22. Parrish, J. K, and W. M. Hammer. 1997. Animal groups in three dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
23. Pennetier, C., B. Warren, K. R. Dabire, I. J. Russell, and G. Gibson. 2010. ÔSinging on the wingo as a mechanism for species recognition in the malarial mosquito Anopheles Gambiae. Curr. Biol. 20: 131-136. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.040.
24. Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1990. Costs and benets of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am. Nat. 136: 230-243.
25. Shimoyama, N., K. Sugawara, T. Mizuguchi, Y. Hayakawa, and M. Sano. 1996. Collective motion in a system of motile elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76: 3870-3873. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3870. (Pubitemid 126630677)
26. Ward, A.J.W., J. E. Herbert-Read, D.J.T. Sumpter, and J. Krause. 2011. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in sh shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108: 2312-2315.