Predicting speech intelligibility by individual hearing-impaired listeners: The path forward

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 239-336

  Grant, Ken W ^a   Bernstein, Joshua G W ^a   Summers, Van ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; NOTE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84878281902     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.7     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (1997) Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, S3.5 New York: American National Standards Institute.
2. Bernstein JGW, Mehraei G, Shamma S, Gallun FJ, Theodoroff SM, LeekMR.(2013) Spectrotemporalmodulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 24(4):293-306.
3. Bernstein JGW, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW. (2013) Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 24(4):307-328.
4. Braida LD. (1991) Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments. Q J Exp Psychol A 43(3):647-677.
5. Chi T, Ru P, Shamma SA. (2005) Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):887-906. (Pubitemid 41129224)
6. Cord M, Baskent D, Kalluri S, Moore B. (2007) Disparity between clinical and real-world performance of hearing aids. Hear Rev 14:22, 24, 26.
7. Elhilali M, Taishih C, Shamma SA. (2003) A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility. Speech Commun 41:331-348.
8. Grant KW. (2001) The effect of speechreading on masked detection thresholds for filtered speech. J Acoust Soc Am 109(5, Pt. 1): 2272-2275.
9. Grant KW, Bernstein JGW, Grassi E. (2008) Modeling auditory and auditory-visual speech intelligibility: challenges and possible solutions. In: Dau T, Buchholz JM, Harte JM, Christiansen TU, eds. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Holbaek, Denmark: Centryk, 47-57.
10. Grant KW, Seitz PF. (2000) The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am 108(3, Pt. 1):1197-1208.
11. Grant KW, Walden BE. (1996) Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 100(4, Pt. 1):2415-2424. (Pubitemid 26340009)
12. Grant KW, Walden TC. (2013) Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 24(4):258-273.
13. Grassi E, Grant KW, Bernstein JGW. (2011) Modeling speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners based on reduced sensitivity to spectrotemporalmodulation. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs:751.
14. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (1969) IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measures. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
15. Johnson DH. (1980) The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am 68(4):1115-1122.
16. Licklider JCR. (1951) A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia 7(4):128-134.
17. Massaro DW. (1987) Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Assoc.
18. Massaro DW. (1998) Perceiving Talking Faces: From Speech Perception to a Behavioral Principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Moore BCJ, Sek A. (1996) Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. J Acoust Soc Am 100(4, Pt. 1):2320-2331.
20. Slaney M, Naar D, Lyon R. (1994) Auditory model inversion for sound separation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process 2:77-80.
21. Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR. (2013) Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 24(4):274-292.
22. Wu YH,Bentler RA. (2010a) Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: part I-laboratory tests. Ear Hear 31(1):22-34.
23. Wu YH, Bentler RA. (2010b) Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: part II-field tests. Ear Hear 31(1):35-46.