Fallout and miss in journal peer review

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 411-416

  Egghe, L ^a,b   Bornmann, Lutz ^c  

^a HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Information management; Information science; Peer review; Serials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878241311     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JD-12-2011-0053     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2009), "The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 117-125.
2. Bornmann{pipe}, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2010), "The manuscript reviewing process - empirical research on review requests, review sequences and decision rules in peer review" in Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 5-12.
3. Bornmann, L., Egghe, L. (2012), "Journal peer review as an information retrieval process" in Journal of Documentation, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 527-535.
4. Egghe, L. (2004), "A universal method of information retrieval evaluation: the 'missing' link M and the universal IR surface" in Information Processing and Management, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 21-30.
5. Egghe, L. (2007), "Existence theorem of the quadruple (P,R,F,M): precision, recall, fallout and miss" in Information Processing and Management, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 265-272.
6. Egghe, L. (2008), "The measures precision, recall, fallout and miss in function of the number of retrieved documents and their mutual interrelations" in Information Processing and Management, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 856-876.
7. Egghe, L. (2010), "Study of some editor-in-chief decision schemes" in Annals of Library and Information Studies, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 184-195.
8. Salton, G., McGill, M.J. (1987), Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, Auckland, New Zealand.
9. Schultz, D.M. (2010), "Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate" in Scientometrics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 277-292.