Computer-assisted surgery: A teacher of TKAs

Knee

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 232-235

  Iorio, R ^a   Mazza, D ^a   G Bolle, ^a   Conteduca, J ^a   Redler, A ^a   Conteduca, F ^a   Ferretti, A ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Learning curve; Overall alignment; TKA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER NAVIGATION SYSTEM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS KNEE; VARUS KNEE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84878228363     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cheng T., Pan X.Y., Mao X., Zhang G.Y., Zhang X.L. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee Nov 28 2011.
2. Ishida K., Matsumoto T., Tsumura N., Kubo S., Kitagawa A., Chin T., et al. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Jul 2011, 19(7):1107-1112.
3. Cheng T., Zhao S., Peng X., Zhang X. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Jul 2012, 20(7):1307-1322.
4. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., Rubash H.E. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 Nov, 356:144-153.
5. Bargren J.H., Blaha J.D., Freeman M.A. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res Mar 1983, (173):178-183.
6. Moreland J.R. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 1988, 226:49-64.
7. Hernández-Vaquero D., Suarez-Vazquez A., Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res Dec 2011, 469(12):3436-3442.
8. Magnussen R.A., Weppe F., Demey G., Servien E., Lustig S. Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res Dec 2011, 469(12):3443-3450.
9. Catani F., Biasca N., Ensini A., Leardini A., Bianchi L., Digennaro V., et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Apr 2008, 90(4):765-771.
10. Stulberg S.D. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov 2003, 416:177-184.
11. Pang H.N., Yeo S.J., Chong H.C., Chin P.L., Ong J., Lo N.N. Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Sep 2011, 19(9):1496-1503.
12. Catani F., Digennaro V., Ensini A., Leardini A., Giannini S. Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Jul 29 2011.
13. Barrett W.P., Mason J.B., Moskal J.T., Dalury D.F., Oliashirazi A., Fisher D.A. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Dec 2011, 26(8):1273-1284. (e1).
14. Conteduca F., Massai F., Iorio R., Zanzotto E., Luzon D., Ferretti A. Blood loss in computer-assisted mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with a conventional technique. Int Orthop Dec 2009, 33(6):1609-1613.
15. Bäthis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Lüring C., Zurakowski D., Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br Jul 2004, 86(5):682-687.
16. Perlick L., Bäthis H., Tingart M., Perlick C., Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand Aug 2004, 75(4):464-470.
17. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., Lo N.N. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty Aug 2005, 20(5):618-626.
18. Tingart M., Lüring C., Bäthis H., Beckmann J., Grifka J., Perlick L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Jan 2008, 16(1):44-50.
19. Langdown A.J., Auld J., Bruce W.J. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005 Apr, 87(4):588-589. (author reply 589).
20. Manzotti A., Cerveri P., De Momi E., Pullen C., Confalonieri N. Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int Orthop Jun 2010, 34(5):655-662. (Epub 2009 Jun 10).
21. Jenny J.Y., Miehlke R.K., Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee Mar 2008, 15(2):80-84.