Osteoarthritic versus osteoporotic bone and intra-skeletal variations in normal bone: Evaluation with μcT and bone histomorphometry

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1059-1066

  Zupan, Janja ^a   Van'T Hof, Rob J ^b   Vindišar, Franci ^c   Haring, Gregor ^a   Trebše, Rihard ^d   Komadina, Radko ^c   Marc, Janja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c General Hospital Celje   (Slovenia)

^d Orthopaedic Hospital Valdoltra   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

CT; controls; histomorphometry; osteoarthritis; osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKELETON;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84878212821     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22318     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aspden RM., 2008. Osteoarthritis: a problem of growth not decay ? Rheumatology (Oxford) 47: 1452-1460.
2. WHO. 1994. WHIO Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843: 1-129.
3. Brandt KD, Dieppe P, Radin EL., 2008. Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 34: 531-559.
4. Jiang LS, Zhang ZM, Jiang SD, et al. 2008. Differential bone metabolism between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 23: 475-483.
5. Stewart A, Black AJ., 2000. Bone mineral density in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 12: 464-467.
6. Dequeker J, Aerssens J, Luyten FP., 2003. Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: clinical and research evidence of inverse relationship. Aging Clin Exp Res 15: 426-439. (Pubitemid 37509168)
7. Li B, Aspden RM., 1997. Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. J Bone Miner Res 12: 641-651. (Pubitemid 27155224)
8. Dequeker J, Johnell O., 1993. Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture: the MEDOS study experience. Bone 14: S51-S56. (Pubitemid 23361518)
9. Franklin J, Englund M, Ingvarsson T, et al. 2010. The association between hip fracture and hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11: 274.
10. Rubinacci A, Tresoldi D, Scalco E, et al. 2012. Comparative high-resolution pQCT analysis of femoral neck indicates different bone mass distribution in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Osteoporos Int 23: 1967-1975.
11. Verstraeten A, Van Ermen H, Haghebaert G, et al. 1991. Osteoarthrosis retards the development of osteoporosis. Observation of the coexistence of osteoarthrosis and osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 264: 169-177.
12. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L., 2009. Osteoarthritis and risk of fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 84: 249-256.
13. Arden NK, Griffiths GO, Hart DJ, et al. 1996. The association between osteoarthritis and osteoporotic fracture: the Chingford Study. Br J Rheumatol 35: 1299-1304.
14. Arden NK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE, et al. 1999. Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 42: 1378-1385. (Pubitemid 30265595)
15. Castaneda S, Roman-Blas JA, Largo R, et al. 2012. Subchondral bone as a key target for osteoarthritis treatment. Biochem Pharmacol 83: 315-323.
16. Shen Y, Zhang ZM, Jiang SD, et al. 2009. Postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis show different ultrastructural characteristics of trabecular bone of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10: 35.
17. Zhang ZM, Li ZC, Jiang LS, et al. 2009. Micro-CT and mechanical evaluation of subchondral trabecular bone structure between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 21: 1383-1390.
18. Fazzalari NL, Kuliwaba JS, Atkins GJ, et al. 2001. The ratio of messenger RNA levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand to osteoprotegerin correlates with bone remodeling indices in normal human cancellous bone but not in osteoarthritis. J Bone Miner Res 16: 1015-1027. (Pubitemid 32467145)
19. Truong LH, Kuliwaba JS, Tsangari H, et al. 2006. Differential gene expression of bone anabolic factors and trabecular bone architectural changes in the proximal femoral shaft of primary hip osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 8: R188.
20. Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, et al. 1998. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 23: 59-66. (Pubitemid 28327502)
21. Cortet B, Chappard D, Boutry N, et al. 2004. Relationship between computed tomographic image analysis and histomorphometry for microarchitectural characterization of human calcaneus. Calcif Tissue Int 75: 23-31. (Pubitemid 38989216)
22. Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, et al. 2005. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT. J Bone Miner Res 20: 1177-1184. (Pubitemid 40863805)
23. Tamminen IS, Isaksson H, Aula AS, et al. 2011. Reproducibility and agreement of micro-CT and histomorphometry in human trabecular bone with different metabolic status. J Bone Miner Metab 29: 442-448.
24. Libouban H, Moreau MF, Legrand E, et al. 2001. Comparison insight dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), histomorphometry, ash weight, and morphometric indices for bone evaluation in an animal model (the orchidectomized rat) of male osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 68: 31-37. (Pubitemid 33658480)
25. Audran M, Chappard D, Legrand E, et al. 2001. Bone microarchitecture and bone fragility in men: DXA and histomorphometry in humans and in the orchidectomized rat model. Calcif Tissue Int 69: 214-217. (Pubitemid 33035390)
26. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Joly J, et al. 1997. Variations in trabecular bone composition with anatomical site and age: potential implications for bone quality assessment. J Endocrinol 155: 411-421. (Pubitemid 27524048)
27. Amling M, Herden S, Posl M, et al. 1996. Heterogeneity of the skeleton: comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 11: 36-45. (Pubitemid 26026742)
28. Donnelly E, Meredith DS, Nguyen JT, et al. 2012. Bone tissue composition varies across anatomic sites in the proximal femur and the iliac crest. J Orthop Res 30: 700-706.
29. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. 1987. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2: 595-610.
30. van't Hof RJ, Landao-Basonga E., 2011. Semi-automated histomorphometry of bone resorption parameters. Bone 48: S135-S136.
31. Zhang Y, Jordan JM., 2010. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 26: 355-369.
32. Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C., 2009. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. In:, Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C, ASBMR, editors. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; p 197-203.