메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 153-173

Continuity, change, and priorities: The quality and use of regulatory analysis across US administrations

Author keywords

Benefit cost analysis; Cost benefit; Regulation; Regulatory impact analysis; Regulatory review

Indexed keywords


EID: 84878179811     PISSN: 17485983     EISSN: 17485991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01149.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (36)

References (42)
  • 2
    • 79959254868 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Role of Analysis on the 17 Most Political Acres on the Face of the Earth
    • Arbuckle DR (2011) The Role of Analysis on the 17 Most Political Acres on the Face of the Earth. Risk Analysis 31, 884-892.
    • (2011) Risk Analysis , vol.31 , pp. 884-892
    • Arbuckle, D.R.1
  • 3
    • 84860474590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Homeland Security and Regulatory Analysis: Are We Safe Yet?
    • Belcore J, Ellig J (2008) Homeland Security and Regulatory Analysis: Are We Safe Yet? Rutgers Law Journal 40, 1-96.
    • (2008) Rutgers Law Journal , vol.40 , pp. 1-96
    • Belcore, J.1    Ellig, J.2
  • 4
    • 78649372693 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Midnight Regulations and Regulatory Review
    • Brito J, de Rugy V (2009) Midnight Regulations and Regulatory Review. Administrative Law Review 61, 163-196.
    • (2009) Administrative Law Review , vol.61 , pp. 163-196
    • Brito, J.1    de Rugy, V.2
  • 5
    • 57949103583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Evaluation of the Quality of Impact Assessment in the European Union with Lessons for the US and the EU
    • Cecot C, Hahn R, Renda A, Schrefler L (2008) An Evaluation of the Quality of Impact Assessment in the European Union with Lessons for the US and the EU. Regulation & Governance 2, 405-424.
    • (2008) Regulation & Governance , vol.2 , pp. 405-424
    • Cecot, C.1    Hahn, R.2    Renda, A.3    Schrefler, L.4
  • 6
    • 42549129186 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences
    • Clinton JD, Lewis DE (2008) Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences. Political Analysis 16, 3-20.
    • (2008) Political Analysis , vol.16 , pp. 3-20
    • Clinton, J.D.1    Lewis, D.E.2
  • 7
    • 0012270142 scopus 로고
    • Executive Order 12866
    • Clinton WJ (1993) Executive Order 12866. Federal Register 58, 51735-51744.
    • (1993) Federal Register , vol.58 , pp. 51735-51744
    • Clinton, W.J.1
  • 8
    • 84878197309 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cinderella Constraint: Why Regulations Increase Significantly During Post-Election Quarters. Unpublished paper, Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL
    • Cochran J (2001) The Cinderella Constraint: Why Regulations Increase Significantly During Post-Election Quarters. Unpublished paper, Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL: http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/The_Cinderella_Constraint(1).pdf.
    • (2001)
    • Cochran, J.1
  • 9
    • 70349267534 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Midnight Regulations and the Cinderella Effect
    • de Rugy V, Davies A (2009) Midnight Regulations and the Cinderella Effect. Journal of Socioeconomics 38, 886-890.
    • (2009) Journal of Socioeconomics , vol.38 , pp. 886-890
    • de Rugy, V.1    Davies, A.2
  • 10
    • 78649340564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulatory Activity in the Bush Administration at the Stroke of Midnight
    • Dudley SE (2009) Regulatory Activity in the Bush Administration at the Stroke of Midnight. Engage 10, 27-29.
    • (2009) Engage , vol.10 , pp. 27-29
    • Dudley, S.E.1
  • 11
    • 84858260327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Many Uses of Regulatory Impact Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of EU and UK Cases
    • Dunlop CA, Maggetti M, Radaelli CM, Russel D (2012) The Many Uses of Regulatory Impact Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of EU and UK Cases. Regulation & Governance 6, 23-45.
    • (2012) Regulation & Governance , vol.6 , pp. 23-45
    • Dunlop, C.A.1    Maggetti, M.2    Radaelli, C.M.3    Russel, D.4
  • 12
    • 84878212114 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Beware the Rush to Presumption, Part B: Substandard Regulatory Analysis for the Affordable Care Act's Interim Final Rules. Working Paper No. 12-2. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from
    • Ellig J, Conover CC (2012) Beware the Rush to Presumption, Part B: Substandard Regulatory Analysis for the Affordable Care Act's Interim Final Rules. Working Paper No. 12-2. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL: http://mercatus.org/publication/beware-rush-presumption-part-b.
    • (2012)
    • Ellig, J.1    Conover, C.C.2
  • 13
    • 84860484839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Quality and Use of Regulatory Analysis in 2008
    • Ellig J, McLaughlin PA (2012) The Quality and Use of Regulatory Analysis in 2008. Risk Analysis 32, 855-880.
    • (2012) Risk Analysis , vol.32 , pp. 855-880
    • Ellig, J.1    McLaughlin, P.A.2
  • 14
    • 80053027746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Challenges of Improving the Economic Analysis of Pending Regulations: The Experience of OMB Circular A-4
    • Fraas A, Lutter R (2011) The Challenges of Improving the Economic Analysis of Pending Regulations: The Experience of OMB Circular A-4. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 71-85.
    • (2011) Annual Review of Resource Economics , vol.3 , pp. 71-85
    • Fraas, A.1    Lutter, R.2
  • 15
    • 61349106049 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Saving Lives through Administrative Law and Economics
    • Graham J (2008) Saving Lives through Administrative Law and Economics. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157, 395-540.
    • (2008) University of Pennsylvania Law Review , vol.157 , pp. 395-540
    • Graham, J.1
  • 16
    • 0035998097 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A New Executive Order for Improving Federal Regulation? Deeper and Wider Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • Hahn RW, Sunstein CR (2002) A New Executive Order for Improving Federal Regulation? Deeper and Wider Cost-Benefit Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150, 1489-1552.
    • (2002) University of Pennsylvania Law Review , vol.150 , pp. 1489-1552
    • Hahn, R.W.1    Sunstein, C.R.2
  • 21
    • 84878178667 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • House Judiciary Committee, Federal Rulemaking and the Regulatory Process: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, 111th Congress, 2nd Session 27 July.
    • House Judiciary Committee (2010) Federal Rulemaking and the Regulatory Process: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, 111th Congress, 2nd Session 27 July.
    • (2010)
  • 22
    • 0017360990 scopus 로고
    • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
    • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
    • (1977) Biometrics , vol.33 , pp. 159-174
    • Landis, J.R.1    Koch, G.G.2
  • 24
    • 79955591151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Consequences of Midnight Regulations and Other Surges in Regulatory Activity
    • McLaughlin PA (2011) The Consequences of Midnight Regulations and Other Surges in Regulatory Activity. Public Choice 147, 395-412.
    • (2011) Public Choice , vol.147 , pp. 395-412
    • McLaughlin, P.A.1
  • 25
    • 84860475803 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does OIRA Review Improve the Quality of Regulatory Impact Analysis? Evidence from the Final Year of the Bush II Administration
    • McLaughlin PA, Ellig J (2011) Does OIRA Review Improve the Quality of Regulatory Impact Analysis? Evidence from the Final Year of the Bush II Administration. Administrative Law Review 63, 179-202.
    • (2011) Administrative Law Review , vol.63 , pp. 179-202
    • McLaughlin, P.A.1    Ellig, J.2
  • 27
    • 84878193211 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. 9 March. Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, Washington, DC.
    • Obama B (2009) Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. 9 March. Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, Washington, DC.
    • (2009)
    • Obama, B.1
  • 28
    • 80053385805 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Executive Order 13563
    • Obama B (2011) Executive Order 13563. Federal Register 76, 3821-3823.
    • (2011) Federal Register , vol.76 , pp. 3821-3823
    • Obama, B.1
  • 29
    • 84878184671 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • OMB (Office of Management and Budget), Circular A-4. 17 September. OMB, Washington, DC.
    • OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (2003) Circular A-4. 17 September. OMB, Washington, DC.
    • (2003)
  • 31
    • 84878169020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • OMB, Agency Checklist: Regulatory Impact Analysis, 3 November. OMB, Washington, DC.
    • OMB (2010) Agency Checklist: Regulatory Impact Analysis, 3 November. OMB, Washington, DC.
    • (2010)
  • 33
    • 0001220166 scopus 로고
    • Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments
    • Perreault WD, Leigh LE (1989) Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 135-148.
    • (1989) Journal of Marketing Research , vol.26 , pp. 135-148
    • Perreault, W.D.1    Leigh, L.E.2
  • 34
    • 3242660875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Transfer Regulations and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    • Posner E (2003) Transfer Regulations and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Duke Law Journal 53, 1067-1110.
    • (2003) Duke Law Journal , vol.53 , pp. 1067-1110
    • Posner, E.1
  • 36
    • 84861906605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Triumph of Regulatory Politics: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Political Salience. Regulation & Governance
    • Shapiro S, Morrall JF III (2012) The Triumph of Regulatory Politics: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Political Salience. Regulation & Governance 6, 189-206
    • (2012) , vol.6 , pp. 189-206
    • Shapiro, S.1    Morrall III, J.F.2
  • 38
    • 84878198753 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Return to Common Sense: Protecting Health, Safety, and the Environment Through "Pragmatic Regulatory Impact Analysis." White Paper No. 909. Center for Progressive Reform, Washington, DC.
    • Steinzor R, Sinden A, Shapiro S, Goodwin J (2009) A Return to Common Sense: Protecting Health, Safety, and the Environment Through "Pragmatic Regulatory Impact Analysis." White Paper No. 909. Center for Progressive Reform, Washington, DC.
    • (2009)
    • Steinzor, R.1    Sinden, A.2    Shapiro, S.3    Goodwin, J.4
  • 39
    • 84866245603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Smarter Regulation: Remarks from Cass Sunstein
    • Special Edition
    • Sunstein C (2011a) Smarter Regulation: Remarks from Cass Sunstein. Administrative Law Review 63 (Special Edition), 7-13.
    • (2011) Administrative Law Review , vol.63 , pp. 7-13
    • Sunstein, C.1
  • 40
    • 84878206277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Letter to Lisa Jackson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 2 September. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL
    • Sunstein C (2011b) Letter to Lisa Jackson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 2 September. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/return/EPA_Return_Letter_9-2-2011.pdf.
    • (2011)
    • Sunstein, C.1
  • 41
    • 84878182455 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Union of Concerned Scientists, Scientific Integrity in Policymaking: The Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL:
    • Union of Concerned Scientists (2004) Scientific Integrity in Policymaking: The Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. [Last accessed 10 Jul 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.webexhibits.org/bush/23.html.
    • (2004)
  • 42
    • 84878204545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Influence of Regulatory Economists in Federal Health and Safety Agencies. Working Paper No. 08-15. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA.
    • Williams R (2008) The Influence of Regulatory Economists in Federal Health and Safety Agencies. Working Paper No. 08-15. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA.
    • (2008)
    • Williams, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.