Victimology versus character: New perspectives on the use of stimulant drugs in children

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 372-373

  Singh, Ilina ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878172358     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101283     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Rose S. Commentary on Singh: Not Robots: children's perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments. J Med Ethics 2013;39:371.
2. ADHD and Me. http://youtu.be/yyaVKvuEBkk
3. Voices on identity, childhood, ethics and stimulants. VOICES Final Report. http://www.adhdvoices.com/adhdreport/ (accessed December 2012).
4. Christensen P. Childhood and the construction of the vulnerable body. In: Prout A, ed. The body, childhood and society. London: MacMillan, 2000: 38-59.
5. Singh I. Brain-talk: power and negotiation in children's discourse about self, brain and behaviour. Soc Health Ill. Published Online First: 25 October 2012.
6. Hyman SE. Might stimulant drugs support moral agency in ADHD children? J Med Ethics 2013;39:369-70.
7. Hope T, Tan J, Stewart A., et al Anorexia nervosa and the language of authenticity. Hastings Center Rep 2011;41:19-29.
8. Erler A, Hope T. Mental disorder and the concept of authenticity. Philos Psychol Psychiatry. 2013. In press.
9. Singh I. Will the 'real boy' please behave: dosing dilemmas for parents of boys with ADHD. AJOB 2005;5:34-47.
10. Caplan A. Accepting a helping hand can be the right thing to do. J Med Ethics 2013;39:367-8.