Bioremediation, an environmental remediation technology for the bioeconomy

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 329-332

  Gillespie, Iain M M ^a   Philp, Jim C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b OECD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BIOLUMINESCENCE; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOSENSOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CONTAMINATION; DNA MODIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; HUMAN; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; METAGENOMICS; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL; WATER CONTAMINATION;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84878131880     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.015     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. European Environment Agency (2007) Progress in Management of Contaminated Sites (CSI 015) - Assessment Published Aug 2007. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-1.
2. Morris, B.L. et al. (2003) Groundwater and its Susceptibility to Degradation: A Global Assessment of the Problem and Options for Management. (Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, RS 03-3), United Nations Environment Programme.
3. European Commission (2007). Environment Fact Sheet: Soil Protection - A New Policy for the EU. (KH-15-04-014-EN-C). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/soil.pdf.
4. De Souza C.A. Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto. Landscape Urban Plann. 2003, 62:181-198.
5. Costanza R., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
6. Guimarães B.C.M., et al. Microbial services and their management: recent progresses in soil bioremediation technology. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 46:157-167.
7. Roelofsen A., et al. Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what?. Res. Policy 2011, 40:341-354.
8. de Lorenzo V. Systems biology approaches to bioremediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19:579-589.
9. Singh J.S., et al. Genetically engineered bacteria: an emerging tool for environmental remediation and future research perspectives. Gene 2011, 480:1-9.
10. Stenuit B., et al. Emerging high-throughput approaches to analyze bioremediation of sites contaminated with hazardous and/or recalcitrant wastes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26:561-575.
11. Diplock E.E., et al. Predicting bioremediation of hydrocarbons: laboratory to field scale. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:1831-1840.
12. International Organization for Standardization Soil Quality - Requirements and Guidance for the Selection and Application of Methods for the Assessment of Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soil and Soil Materials 2008, ISO 17402.
13. Ciric L., et al. Field scale molecular analysis for the monitoring of bacterial community structures during on-site diesel bioremediation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5235-5241.
14. Ramos J-L., et al. Laboratory research aimed at closing the gaps in microbial bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29:641-647.
15. Morais S.A., Delerue-Matos C. A perspective on LCA application in site remediation services: critical review of challenges. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175:12-22.
16. Kalin R.M. Engineered passive bioreactive barriers: risk-managing the legacy of industrial soil and groundwater pollution. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7:227-238.