Fads, Funding, and Forgetting in Three Decades of Conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 437-438

  Redford, Kent H ^a   Padoch, Christine ^b   Sunderland, Terry ^b  

^a Archipelago Consulting   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES;

EID: 84878122705     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12071     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Adams, W. M. 2010. Path dependence in conservation. Pages 292-310 in N. Leader-Williams, W. M. Adams, and R. J. Smith, editors. Trade-offs in conservation: deciding what to save. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2. Johnson, S. 2011. Where good ideas come from: the natural history of innovation. Riverhead Trade, New York.
3. Knight, A. G. 2006. Failing but learning: writing the wrongs after Redford and Taber. Conservation Biology 20:1312-1314.
4. Patten, M. A., and B. D. Smith-Patten 2011. 'As if' philosophy: conservation biology's real hope. BioScience 61:425-426.
5. Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York.
6. Senge, P. 2006. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York.
7. Sturdy, A. 2004. The adoption of management ideas and practices. Theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Management Learning 35:155-179.
8. Swaisgood, R. R., and J. K. Sheppard 2010. The culture of conservation biologists: show me the hope! BioScience 60:626-630.