Managing forest plantation landscapes for water conservation

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 301, Issue , 2013, Pages 58-66

  Ferraz, Silvio F B ^a   Lima, Walter de Paula ^a   Rodrigues, Carolina Bozetti ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Forestry Science and Research Institute (IPEF)   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Catchment; Eucalyptus plantation; Landscape management; Sustainable forest management; Water use

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; EUCALYPTUS PLANTATIONS; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WATER USE;

BIODIVERSITY; CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE CHANGE; FLOW OF WATER; HYDRAULICS; RUNOFF; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER SUPPLY;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; CATCHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH RATE; LANDSCAPE; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THRESHOLD; WATER FLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; EUCALYPTUS; HYDRAULICS; PLANTATIONS; RUNOFF; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

BRAZIL;

EUCALYPTUS;

EID: 84878108036     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.015     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abraf, 2010. ABRAF Statistical Year Book - Base Year 2009. ABRAF, Brasília.
2. Almeida C.A., Soares J.V., Lansberg J.J., Rezende G.D. Growth and water balance of Eucalyptus grandis hybrid plantations in Brazil during a rotation for pulp production. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 251:10-21.
3. Andréassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. J. Hydrol. 2004, 291:1-27.
4. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Ryan M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2004, 193:5-16.
5. Brown A.E., Zhang L., McMahon T., Western A.W., Vertessy R.A. A review of paired catchment studies for determining change in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J. Hydrol. 2005, 310:28-61.
6. Calder I.R. Forests and water: ensuring benefits outweigh water costs. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 251:110-120.
7. Câmara C.D., Lima W.P. Clearcutting of a 50years old growth Eucalyptus saligna plantation: impacts on water balance and water quality in an experimental catchment. Scientia Forestalis 1999, 56:41-58.
8. Cornish P.M., Vertessy R.A. Forest age-induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in eucalypt forest. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242:43-63.
9. Creed I.F., Sass G.Z., Buttle J.M., Jone J.A. Hydrological principles for sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Hydrol. Process. 2011, 25:2152-2160.
10. Falkenmark M., Folk C. The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2002, 6:1-9.
11. FAO, 1991. Conclusions and Recommendations. 10th World Forestry Congress. Revue Forestiere Française, Hors Serie, 9, 285-286.
12. Farley K.A., Jobbagy E.G., Jackson R.B. Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:1565-1576.
13. Gayoso J., Acuna M., Munoz R. Gestión sustenable de ecosistemas forestales: caso prédio San Pablo de Trégua, Chile. Bosque 2001, 22:75-84.
14. Gordon L., Finlayson C.M., Falkenmark M. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric. Water Manage. 2011, 97:512-519.
15. Gush, M.B., Scott, D.F., Jewitt, G.P.W., Schulze, R.E., Lumsden, T.G., Hallowes, L.A., Görgens, A.H.M., 2002. Estimation of streamflow reductions resulting from commercial afforestation in South Africa. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and the Water Research Commission. WRC Report No. TT 173/02.
16. Hewlett, J.D., Hibbert, A.R., 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. In: Sopper, W.E., Lull, H.W. (Eds.), International Symposium on Forest Hydrology. Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 275-290.
17. Hubbard R.M., Stape J., Ryan M.G., Almeida A.C., Rojas J. Effects of irrigation on water use and water use efficiency in two fast growing Eucalyptus plantations. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:1714-1721.
18. Kuczera G. Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash- mixed species eucalypt forest. J. Hydrol. 1987, 94:215-236.
19. Lane P.N.J., Mackay S.M. Streamflow response of mixed species eucalypt forest to patch cutting and thinning treatments. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2001, 143:131-142.
20. Lima W.P. Overland flow and soil and nutrient losses from Eucalyptus plantations. IPEF Int. 1990, 1:35-44.
21. Lima, W.P., 1998. Soil and water protection. In: International Conference on Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Natural Resources and Environment, Australia, pp. 56-57.
22. Lima W.P. O eucalipto seca o solo?. Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2004, 29:13-17.
23. Lima W.P. Plantation forestry and water: science, dogmas, challenges. Writings of the dialogue 2011, Instituto BioAtlântica, Rio de Janeiro, p. 64.
24. Lima, W.P., Zakia, M.J.B., 2006. As Florestas plantadas e a água: implementando o conceito da microbacia hidrográfica como unidade de planejamento. RiMa Editora, pp. 226.
25. Lima W.P., Laprovitera R., Ferraz S.F.B., Rodrigues C.B., Silva M.M. Forest plantations and water consumption: a strategy for hydrosolidarity. Int. J. Forest. Res., Ar. ID 2012, 908465:p. 8.
26. Lima, W.P., Ferraz, S.F.B., Rodrigues, C.B., Voigtlaender, M., 2012b. Assessing the hydrological effects of forest plantations in Brazil. In: Boon, P.J., Raven, P.J. (Eds.), River Conservation and Management. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 57-66.
27. Marengo J.A., Ambrizzi T., Rocha R.P., Alves L.M., Cuadra S.V., Valverde M.C., Torres R.R., Santos D.C., Ferraz S.E. Future change of climate in South America in the late twenty-first century: intercomparison of scenarios from three regional climate models. Climate Dyn. 2010, 35:1073-1097.
28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being, 2005. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
29. Nambiar E.K.S. Productivity and sustainability of plantation forests. Bosque 1999, 20:9-21.
30. Nambiar E.K.S., Brown A.G. Towards sustained productivity of tropical plantations: science and practice. Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests 1997, 527-554. ACIAR/CSIRO/CIFOR. E.K.S. Nambiar, A.G. Brown (Eds.).
31. Nardelli A.M.B., Griffith J.J. Mapeamento conceitual da visão de sustentabilidade de diferentes atores do setor florestal brasileiro. Revista árvore 2003, 27:241-256.
32. Neary D.G., Ice G.G., Jackson C.R. Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:2269-2281.
33. Rodríguez-Suárez J.A., Soto B., Perez R., Diaz-Fierros F. Influence of Eucalyptus globulus plantation growth on water table levels and low flows in a small catchment. J. Hydrol. 2011, 396:321-326.
34. Scott D.F. On the hydrology of industrial timber plantation. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19:4203-4206.
35. Scott D.F., Prinsloo F.W. Longer-term effects of pine and eucalypt plantations on streamflow. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44.
36. Scott D.F., Smith R.E. Preliminary empirical models to predict reductions in total and low resulting from afforestation. Water SA 1997, 23:2.
37. Stape J.L., Gonçalves J.L., Gonçalves A.N. Relationships between nursery practises and Field performance for Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil - a historical overview and its increasing importance. New Forest. 2001, 22:19-41.
38. Stape J.L., Binkley D., Ryan M.G. Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2004, 193:17-31.
39. Tetzlaff D., Malcolm I.A., Soulsby C. Influence of forestry, environmental change and climatic variability on the hydrology, hydrochemistry and residence times of upland catchments. J. Hydrol. 2007, 346:93-111.
40. Van Dijk A.I.J.M., Keenan R.J. Planted forests and water in perspective. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 251:1-9.
41. Vanclay J.K. Managing water use from forest plantation. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:385-389.
42. Vertessy R.A., Hatton T.J., Benyon R.G., Dawes W.R. Long-term growth and water balance predictions for a mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forest catchment subject to clear-felling and regeneration. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16:221-232.
43. Vertessy R.A., Watson F.G.R., ÓSullivan S.K. Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2001, 143:13-26.
44. Wang S. One hundred faces of sustainable forest management. Forest Policy Econ. 2004, 6:205-213.
45. Whitehead D., Kelliher F.M. A canopy water balance model for a Pinus radiate stand before and after thining. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 1991, 55:109-126.
46. Zhang L., Dawes W.R., Walker G.R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37:701-708.