Auditory cortical activity in normal hearing subjects to consonant vowels presented in quiet and in noise

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 124, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1204-1215

  Dimitrijevic, Andrew ^a   Pratt, Hillel ^c   Starr, Arnold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

CLARA (Classical LORETA recursively applied); Evoked potentials; Source analysis; Speech perception; Temporal processing; Voice onset time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; CONSONANT; ELECTRODE; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VOICE ONSET TIME; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ALGORITHMS; AUDITORY CORTEX; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEARING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; TEMPORAL LOBE; VOICE;

EID: 84878107412     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S., Kraus N. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. J Neurosci 2008, 28:3958-3965.
2. Alves-Pinto A., Baudoux S., Palmer A.R., Sumner C.J. Forward masking estimated by signal detection theory analysis of neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2010, 11:477-494.
3. Davis H., Zerlin S. Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1966, 39:109-116.
4. Dimitrijevic A., Lolli B., Zeng F.G., Starr A. Intensity changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials comparison with frequency changes. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:374-383.
5. Dimitrijevic A., Zeng F.G., Pratt H., Starr A. Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:2111-2124.
6. Eggermont J.J., Ponton C.W. The neurophysiology of auditory perception: from single units to evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2002, 7:71-99.
7. Elangovan S., Stuart A. A cross-linguistic examination of cortical auditory evoked potentials for a categorical voicing contrast. Neurosci Lett 2011, 490:140-144.
8. Frye R.E., Fisher J.M., Coty A., Zarella M., Liederman J., Halgren E. Linear coding of voice onset time. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:1476-1487.
9. Giraud K., Trébuchon-DaFonseca A., Démonet J.F., Habib M., Liégeois-Chauvel C. Asymmetry of voice onset time-processing in adult developmental dyslexics. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:1652-1663.
10. Hari R., Pelizzone M., Makela J.P., Huttunen J., Knuutila J. Neuromagnetic reponses from a deaf subject to stimuli presented through a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Ear Hear 1988, 9:148-152.
11. Hoonhorst I., Serniclaes W., Collet G., Colin C., Markessis E., Radeau M., et al. N1b and Na subcomponents of the N100 long latency auditory evoked-potential: neurophysiological correlates of voicing in French-speaking subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:897-903.
12. Horev N., Most T., Pratt H. Categorical perception of speech (VOT) and analogous non-speech (FOT) signals: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates. Ear Hear 2007, 28:111-128.
13. Ille N., Berg P., Scherg M. Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 19:113-124.
14. Jones S.J., Perez N. The auditory " C-process" : analyzing the spectral envelope of complex sounds. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:965-975.
15. Laufer A. Voicing in contemporary Hebrew in comparison with other languages. Hebrew Studies 1998, 39:143-179.
16. Liegeois-Chauvel C., de Graaf J.B., Laguitton V., Chauvel P. Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding. Cereb Cortex 1999, 9:484-496.
17. Lisker L., Abramson A.S. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 1964, 20:384-422.
18. Loveless N., Hari R., Hämäläinen M., Tiihonen J. Evoked responses of human auditory cortex may be enhanced by preceding stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989, 74:217-227.
19. Marlin S., Feldmann D., Nguyen Y., Rouillon I., Loundon N., Jonard L., et al. Temperature-sensitive auditory neuropathy associated with an otoferlin mutation: deafening fever!. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 394:737-742.
20. Martin B.A., Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-ralated potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear 1999, 20:33-44.
21. Martin B.A., Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 107:2155-2161.
22. McCullagh P., Nedler J.A. General Linear Models 1983, Chapman & Hall, London.
23. Onishi S., Davis H. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1968, 44:582-591.
24. Papanicolaou A.C., Castillo E., Breier J.I., Davis R.N., Simos P.G., Diehl R.L. Differential brain activation patterns during perception of voice and tone onset time series: a MEG study. Neuroimage 2003, 18:448-459.
25. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978, 45:198-210.
26. Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Dimitrijevic A., Bleich N., Mittelman N. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:360-373.
27. Rance G., Fava R., Baldock H., Chong A., Barker E., Corben L., et al. Speech perception ability in individuals with Friedreich ataxia. Brain 2008, 131:2002-2012.
28. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. J Acoust Soc Am 1999, 106:1078-1083.
29. Sharma A., Dorman M.F. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 107:2697-2703.
30. Sharma A., Marsh C.M., Dorman M.F. Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 108:3030-3035.
31. Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Palva S., Ilmoniemi R.J., Naatanen R. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage 2000, 12:657-663.
32. Skinner P.H., Jones H.C. Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential. J Speech Hear Res. 1968, 11(2):301-306.
33. Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Zeng F.G., Fujikawa-Brooks S., Linthicum F., Kim C.S., et al. Pathology and physiology of auditory neuropathy with a novel mutation in the MPZ gene (Tyr145->Ser). Brain 2003, 126:1604-1619.
34. Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y., Hood L.J., Berlin C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996, 119:741-753.
35. Toscano J.C., McMurray B., Dennhardt J., Luck S.J. Continuous perception and graded categorization: electrophysiological evidence for a linear relationship between the acoustic signal and perceptual encoding of speech. Psychol Sci 2010, 21:1532-1540.
36. Tremblay K.L., Piskosz M., Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1332-1343.
37. Tremblay K.L., Friesen L., Martin B.A., Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear 2003, 24:225-232.
38. Trébuchon-Da Fonseca A., Giraud Kimberly, Badier J-.M., Chauvel Patrick, Liégeois-Chauvel Catherine Hemispheric lateralization of voice onset time (VOT) comparison between depth and scalp EEG recordings. Neuroimage 2005, 27:1-14.
39. Varga R., Avenarius M.R., Kelley P.M., Keats B.J., Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., et al. OTOF mutations revealed by genetic analysis of hearing loss families including a potential temperature sensitive auditory neuropathy allele. J Med Genet 2006, 43:576-581.
40. Wehr M., Zador A.M. Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex. Neuron 2005, 47:437-445.
41. Williams L. The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Atten Percept Psychophys 1977, 19:285-289.
42. Woldorff M.G. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:98-119.
43. Woods David L., Yund E.W., Herron T.J., Ua Cruadhlaoich M.A.I. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2010, 127:1609-1623.
44. Zaehle T., Jancke L., Meyer M. Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features. Behav Brain Funct 2007, 3:63.
45. Zeng F.-G., Kong Y.-Y., Michalewski Henry J., Starr Arnold Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93:3050-3063.
46. Zheng Y., Escabí M.A. Distinct roles for onset and sustained activity in the neuronal code for temporal periodicity and acoustic envelope shape. J Neurosci 2008, 28:14230-14244.