Accuracy of imaging methods for detection of bone tissue invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Uribe, S ^a   Rojas, L A ^a   Rosas, C F ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Carcinoma; Diagnostic accuracy; Neoplasm invasiveness; Squamous cell; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MANDIBLE TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR INVASION;

CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; SQUAMOUS CELL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MANDIBULAR NEOPLASMS; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84878096906     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120346     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bleyer A. Cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx in young females: increasing incidence, role of human papilloma virus, and lack of survival improvement. Semin Oncol 2009; 36: 451-459. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.07. 005.
2. de Camargo Cancela M, Voti L, Guerra-Yi M, Chapuis F, Mazuir M, Curado MP. Oral cavity cancer in developed and in developing countries: population-based incidence. Head Neck 2010; 32: 357-367. doi: 10.1002/hed.21193.
3. Warnakulasuriya S. Living with oral cancer: epidemiology with particular reference to prevalence and life-style changes that influence survival. Oral Oncol 2010; 46: 407-410. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.015.
4. Silverman S Jr. Demographics and occurrence of oral and pharyngeal cancers. The outcomes, the trends, the challenge. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 7S-11S.
5. Choi S, Myers JN. Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: implications for therapy. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 14-32.
6. Upile T, Fisher C, Jerjes W, El Maaytah M, Singh S, Sudhoff H, et al. Recent technological developments: in situ histopathological interrogation of surgical tissues and resection margins. Head Face Med 2007; 3: 13. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-13.
7. Genden EM, Ferlito A, Silver CE, Takes RP, Súarez C, Owen RP, et al. Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267: 1001-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1206-2.
8. Tshering Vogel DW, Zbaeren P, Thoeny HC. Cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Cancer Imaging 2010; 10: 62-72. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0008.
9. Brockenbrough JM, Petruzzelli GJ, Lomasney L. DentaScan as an accurate method of predicting mandibular invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 113-117. (Pubitemid 36070886)
10. Rajesh A, Khan A, Kendall C, Hayter J, Cherryman G. Can magnetic resonance imaging replace single photon computed tomography and computed tomography in detecting bony invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46: 11-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007. 08.024. (Pubitemid 350266151)
11. Park J-O, Jung S-L, Joo Y-H, Jung C-K, Cho K-J, Kim M-S. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of tumor invasion depth in oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2011; 47: 381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology. 2011.03.012.
12. Union for International Cancer Control. How to use the TMN classification. 2012 [cited 4 April 2012]. Available from: http://www.uicc.org/ resources/how-use-Tnm-classification
13. Liao CT, Chang JTC, Wang HM, Ng SH, Hsueh C, Lee LY, et al. Surgical outcome of T4a and resected T4b oral cavity cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 337-344. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21984. (Pubitemid 44036563)
14. Cohen EE, Baru J, Huo D, Haraf DJ, Crowley M, Witt ME, et al. Efficacy and safety of treating T4 oral cavity tumors with primary chemoradiotherapy. Head Neck 2009; 31: 1013-1021. doi: 10.1002/hed.21062.
15. Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005.
16. Wakasugi-Sato N, Kodama M, Matsuo K, Yamamoto N, Oda M, Ishikawa A, et al. Advanced clinical usefulness of ultrasonography for diseases in oral and maxillofacial regions. Int J Dent [serial on internet]. 2010 [cited 27 November 2012]. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/aip/639382/
17. Momin MA, Okochi K, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, Omura K, Amagasa T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion of lower gingival carcinoma: comparison with conventional panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 75-81.
18. Dreiseidler T, Alarabi N, Ritter L, Rothamel D, Scheer M, Zoller JE, et al. A comparison of multislice computerized tomography, cone-beam computerized tomography, and single photon emission computerized tomography for the assessment of bone invasion by oral malignancies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo. 2011.04.001.
19. Vidiri A, Guerrisi A, Pellini R, Manciocco V, Covello R, Mattioni O, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the oral cavity. Correlation with pathological data. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 29: 73. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-73.
20. Nahmias C, Lemmens C, Faul D, Carlson E, Long M, Blodgett T, et al. Does reducing CT artifacts from dental implants influence the PET interpretation in PET/CT studies of oral cancer and head and neck cancer? J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 1047-1052. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049858. (Pubitemid 351948011)
21. Babin E, Desmonts C, Hamon M, B́enateau H, Hitier M. PET/CT for assessing mandibular invasion by intraoral squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33: 47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2007.01569.x. (Pubitemid 351300168)
22. Goerres GW, Schmid DT, Schuknecht B, Eyrich GK. Bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer: comparison of conventional CT with PET/CT and SPECT/CT. Radiology 2005; 237: 281-287. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041228. (Pubitemid 41346175)
23. Brown JS, Lewis-Jones H. Evidence for imaging the mandible in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39: 411-418. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2001.0717. (Pubitemid 34030832)
24. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529-536. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-155-8- 201110180-00009.
25. Araki K, Ariji E, Shimizu M, Kanda S, Ozeki S, Shinohara M, et al. Computed tomography of carcinoma of the upper gingiva and hard palate: correlation with the surgical and histopathological findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 177-182. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600235.
26. Van Cann EM, Koole R, Oyen WJG, de Rooy JWJ, de Wilde PC, Slootweg PJ, et al. Assessment of mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma by various modes of imaging: constructing a diagnostic algorithm. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.02.009. (Pubitemid 351726424)
27. van den Brekel MW, Runne RW, Smeele LE, Tiwari RM, Snow GB, Castelijns JA. Assessment of tumour invasion into the mandible: the value of different imaging techniques. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1552-1557. (Pubitemid 128662692)
28. Hendrikx AWF, Maal T, Dieleman F, Van Cann EM, Merkx MAW. Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39: 436-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.008.
29. Gu DH, Yoon DY, Park CH, Chang SK, Lim KJ, Seo YL, et al. CT, MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 1111-1119. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.520027.
30. Handschel J, Naujoks C, Depprich RA, Kübler NR, Kröpil P, Kuhlemann J, et al. CT-scan is a valuable tool to detect mandibular involvement in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2012; 48: 361-366. doi: 10.1016/j. oraloncology.2011.11.009.
31. Natori T, Koga M, Anegawa E, Nakashima Y, Tetsuka M, Yoh J, et al. Usefulness of intra-oral ultrasonography to predict neck metastasis in patients with tongue carcinoma. Oral Dis 2008; 14: 591-599. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825. 2007.01423.x.
32. Kodama M, Khanal A, Habu M, Iwanaga K, Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, et al. Ultrasonography for intraoperative determination of tumor thickness and resection margin in tongue carcinomas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1746-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.110.
33. Dahabreh IJ, Chung M, Kitsios GD, Terasawa T, Raman G, Tatsioni A, et al. Comprehensive overview of methods and reporting of meta-Analyses of test accuracy. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012.
34. Thornbury Jr. Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 1-8. (Pubitemid 24043662)
35. Kim IH, Patel MJ, Hirt SL, Kantor ML. Clinical research and diagnostic efficacy studies in the oral and maxillofacial radiology literature: 1996-2005. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 274-281. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/81879482.
36. Uribe S. The impact of imaging technologies on temporomandibular joint disorder diagnosis. Evid Based Dent 2011; 12: 113-114. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd. 6400828.
37. Albuquerque MA, Kuruoshi ME, Oliveira IR, Cavalcanti MG. CT assessment of the correlation between clinical examination and bone involvement in oral malignant tumors. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 196-202.
38. Long NM, Smith CS. Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging. Insights Imaging 2011; 2: 679-698. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0062-3.