Sexual and Natural Selection Both Influence Male Genital Evolution

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  House, Clarissa M ^a   Lewis, Zenobia ^a,b   Hodgson, Dave J ^a   Wedell, Nina ^a   Sharma, Manmohan D ^a   Hunt, John ^a   Hosken, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; FACTORIAL DESIGN; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; MONOGAMY; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYANDRY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENITALIA, MALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84878078153     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063807     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 87-93.
3. Arnqvist G, (1998) Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784-786.
4. Simmons LW, García-González F, (2011) Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology. Nature communications 2: 374 doi:10.1038/ncomms1379.
5. Simmons LW, House CM, Hunt J, García-González F, (2009) Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology. Curr. Biol. 19: 1442-1446.
6. Cayetano L, Maklakov AA, Brooks RC, Bonduriansky R, (2011) Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection. Evolution 65: 2171-2183.
7. Arnqvist G, Thornhill R, (1998) Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. Camb. 71: 193-212.
8. Eberhard WG, Huber BA, Rodriguez LR, Briceno RD, Salas I, et al. (1998) One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52: 415-431.
9. Preziosi RF, Roff DA, (1998) Evidence of genetic isolation between sexually monomorphic and sexually dimorphic traits in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Heredity 81: 92-99.
10. Bernstein S, Bernstein R, (2002) Allometry of male genitalia in a species of soldier beetle: support for the one-size-fits-all hypothesis. Evolution 56: 1707-1710.
11. Vencl FV, (2004) Allometry and proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in Photinus fireflies, and some other beetles. Integr. Omp. Biol. 44: 242-249.
12. House CM, Simmons LW, (2005) The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1281-1292.
13. Shapiro AM, Porter AH, (1989) The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Ann. Res. Entomol. 34: 231-245.
14. Eberhard WG, (2008) Static allometry and animal genitalia. Evolution 63: 48-66.
15. Lande R, (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
16. House CM, Simmons LW, (2003) Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 447-455.
17. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, DeWitt T J, (2005) Male genital size reflects a trade-off between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 7618-7623.
18. Jennions MD, Kelly CD, (2002) Geographical variation in male genitalia in Brachyrhaphis episcopi (Poeciliidae): is it sexually or naturally selected? Oikos 97: 79-86.
19. Eberhard WG, Rodriguez RL, Polihronaki M, (2009) Pitfalls in understanding the functional significance of genital allometry. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 435-445.
20. Ghiselin MT (2010) The distinction between primary and secondary sexual characters. In: Leonard JL, Cordoba-Aguilar A, editors. The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9-14.
21. Garcia-Gonzalez F (2011) Sexual selection and experimental evolution. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELE). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.0022859.
22. Coyne J, (1983) Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 37: 1101-1118.
23. True JR, Liu J, Stam LF, Zeng Z-B, Laurie CC, (1997) Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in male secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 51: 816-832.
24. Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS, (2006) A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1058-1070.
25. Zeng ZB, Liu J, Stam LF, Kao CH, Mercer JM, et al. (2000) Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics 154: 299-310.
26. Sharma MD, Hunt J, Hosken D J, (2011) Antagonistic responses to natural and sexual selection and the sex-specific evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 66: 665-677.
27. Hosken DJ, Taylor ML, Hoyle K, Higgins S, Wedell N, (2008) Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18: R553-R554.
28. Wright LI, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ, (2008) Inbeeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv. Genet. 9: 833-843.
29. Taylor ML, Wedell N, Hosken DJ, (2007) Sexual selection and female fitness in Drosophila simulans. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 721-728.
30. Taylor ML, Wigmore C, Hodgson DJ, Wedell N, Hosken DJ, (2008) Multiple mating increases female fitness in Drosophila simulans. Anim. Behav. 76: 963-970.
31. Rohlf FJ (2008) tpsRelw, relative warps analysis, version 1.46. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
32. Rohlf FJ (2009) tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.14. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
33. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Hosken DJ, Taylor ML, Hoyle K, Higgins S, Wedell N, (2008) Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18: R553-554.
35. Inglby FC, Hunt J, Hosken DJ, (2012) Heritability of male attractiveness persists despite evidence for unreliable sexual signals in Drosophila simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 311-324.
36. Reinhardt K, (2010) Natural selection and genital variation: a role for the environment, parasites and sperm ageing? Genetica 138: 119-127.
37. Higgins S, Hosken DJ, Wedell N, (2009) Phenotypic and genetic variation in male genitalia in the seedbug, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 400-405.
38. Reinhardt K, (2007) Evolutionary consequences of sperm cell aging. Q. Rev. Biol. 82: 375-393.
39. Blanckenhorn WU, (1999) Different growth responses to temperature and resource limitation in three fly species with similar life histories. Evol. Ecol. 13: 395-409.
40. Andrade CAC, Hatadani LM, Klaczko LB, (2005) Phenotypic plasticity of the aedeagus of Drosophila mediopunctata: Effect of the temperature. J. Therm. Biol. 30: 518-523.
41. Roff DA (2001) Life History Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
42. Parker GA (1984) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. London: Academic Press.
43. Eberhard WG (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Kamimura Y, (2010) Copulation anatomy of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae): wound-making organs and their possible roles. Zoomorph. 129: 163-174.
45. Civetta A, Clark AG, (2000) Correlated effects of sperm competition and post-mating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162-13165.