Divergence: The impact of lifecycle changes on commonality

17th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2007 - Systems Engineering: Key to Intelligent Enterprises

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 136-151

  Boas, Ryan ^a   Crawley, Edward ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE CULTURE; CURRENT PRACTICES; DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS; MULTI SYSTEMS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; OVERALL EFFICIENCY; PROGRAM PLANNING; REQUIREMENTS CHANGE;

CURRICULA; OBSOLESCENCE;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84878037191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Art, R. The TFX Decision: McNamara and the Military. Little, Brown and Company: Boston, 1968.
2. Boas, R. and Crawley, E. "Extending Platforming to the Sequential Development of System Families." 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council On Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Orlando, July 9 - 13, 2006.
3. Boehm, B. "A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement." Computer, 21(5), 1988, p. 61-72.
4. Cusumano, M. and Nobeoka, K. Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-Project Management Is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies. New York: Free Press, 1998.
5. Fricke, E. and Schulz, A. "Design for Changeability (DfC): Principles to Enable Changes in Systems Throughout Their Entire Lifecycle." Systems Engineering, 8(4), 2005, pp. 342-359.
6. Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., Otto, K. and Baker, J. "A Method for Architecting Product Platforms." Research in Engineering Design 12(2000), p. 61-72.
7. Li, H. and Azarm, S. "Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage." Journal of Mechanical Design, v.122, Dec. 2000, pp.411-418.
8. Li, H. and Azarm, S. "An Approach for Product Line Design Selection Under Uncertainty and Competition." Journal of Mechanical Design, v.124, Sept. 2002, pp.385-392.
9. Meyer, M. and Lehnerd, A. The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: The Free Press, 1997.
10. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1996.
11. Richey, G. F-111 Systems Engineering Case Study. Center for Systems Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology.
12. Simpson, T., Maier, J. and Mistree, F. "Product Platform Design: Method and Application." Research in Engineering Design, 13(2001), pp. 2 - 22.
13. Simpson, T. "Product Platform Design and Optimization: Status and Promise." ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences- Design Theory and Methodology, Chicago, IL, September 2-6, 2003, Paper DETC2003/DAC-48717.
14. TFX Contract Investigations, Committee on Government Operations, Senate, Series 1, 88th Congress, 1964.
15. TFX Contract Investigations, Committee on Government Operations, Senate, Series 2, 91st Congress, 1970.
16. TFX Contract Investigation Report, Committee on Governmental Affairs, Senate, 1970.
17. Ullman, D. The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992.
18. Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S. Product Design and Development. 2nd ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw- Hill, 2000.
19. de Weck, O. and Suh, E.S. "Flexible Product Platforms: Framework and Case Study." Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, Philadelphia, PA, DETC2006-99163, Sept. 10-13, 2006 www.jsf.mil, accessed March 1, 2007.