Retraction Note to An improved data mining technique for classification and detection of breast cancer from mammograms [Neural Comput & Applic, (2013), 22(Supplement 1), S303-S310, DOI 10.1007/s00521-012-0834-4];An improved data mining technique for classification and detection of breast cancer from mammograms

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages 303-310

  Mohanty, Aswini Kumar ^a   Senapati, Manas Ranjan ^b   Lenka, Saroj Kumar ^c  

^a SIKSHA O ANUSANDHAN DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Krupajal Group Of Institutions   (India)

^c Department of Computer Science   (India)

Author keywords

Association rule mining; Computer aided diagnosis; Data mining; Gray level co occurrence matrix features; Mammogram classification; Region of interest; Statistical features

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION RULES; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; EXTRACTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TISSUE; X RAY SCREENS;

CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; COMPUTER AIDED CLASSIFICATION; EARLY DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER; FEATURE EXTRACTION AND CLASSIFICATION; GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX; MAMMOGRAM CLASSIFICATIONS; REGION OF INTEREST; STATISTICAL FEATURES;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84878012105     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: 14333058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-2083-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Cheng H, Lui YM, Freimanis RI (1998) A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(3): 442-450.
2. Sampat PM, Markey MK, Bovik AC (2005) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography. In: Bovik AC (ed) Handbook of image and video processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham, MA, pp 1195-1217.
3. Winsberg F, Elkin M, Macy J, Bordaz V, Weymouth W (1967) Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology 89: 211-215.
4. Marx C, Malich A, Facius M, Grebenstein U, Sauner D, Pfleiderer SOR, Kaiser WA (2004) Are unnecessary follow-up procedures induced by computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography? Comparison of Mammographic diagnosis with and without use of CAD. Eur J Radiol 51: 66-72.
5. Sajda P, Spence C, Pearson J (2002) Learning Contextual Relationships in Mammograms Using a Hierarchical Pyramid Neural Network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(3): 239-250.
6. Youssry N, Abou-Chadi F, El-Sayad AM (2002) A neural network approach for mass detection in digitized mammograms. ACBME 109-116.
7. Kobatake H, Murakami M, Takeo H, Nawano S (1999) Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(5): 369-378.
8. Yu S, Guan L (2000) A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(2): 115-126.
9. Verma B, Zakos J (2001) A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 5(1): 46-54.
10. Senapati MR, Mohanty AK, Dash S, Dash PK (2011) Local linear wavelet neural network for breast cancer recognition. Neural Comput Appl. doi: 10. 1007/s00521-011-0670-y.
11. Hagihara Y, Hagihara Y, Wei J (2005) Enhancement of CAD system for breast cancers by improvement of classifiers. Syst Comput Jpn 36(9): 65-76.
12. Furuya S, Wei T, Hagihara Y, Shimizu A, Kabotake H, Nawano S (2004) Improvement of performance to discriminate malignant tumors from normal tissue on mammograms by feature selection and evaluation of features selection criteria. Syst Comput Jpn 35(7): 72-84.
13. Fogela DB, Wasson EC, Boughton EM, Pm-to VW (1997) A step toward computer-assisted mammography using evolutionary programming and neural networks. Cancer Lett 119: 93-97.
14. Brake GM, Karssemeijer N (1999) Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18: 628-639.
15. http://marathon. csee. usf. edu/Mammography/Database. html.
16. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital Image processing. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, pp 76-142.
17. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans System Man Cybern SMC-3: 610-621.
18. Walker RF, Jackway P, Longstaff ID (1995) Improving co- occurrence matrix feature discrimination. In Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA'95), pp. 643-648, Brisbane, Australia.
19. Le CT (2003) Introductory biostatistics. Wiley, London.
20. Liu B, Hsu W, Ma Y (1998) Integrating classification and association rule mining. In Proceedings of 4th International Conferences on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 80-86.
21. Zaïane OR, Han J, Zhu H (2000) Mining recurrent items in multimedia with progressive resolution refinement. In Proceedings of 16th International Conferences on Data Engineering, pp 461-470.
22. Thangavel K, Kaja Mohideen A (2009) Classification of microcalcifications using multi-dimensional genetic association rule miner. Int J Recent Trends Eng 2(2): 233-235.
23. Ribeiro MX, Traina AJM, Traina C, Azevedo-Marques PM, Sao Paulo Univ., Sao Carlos (2008) An association rule-based method to support medical image diagnosis with efficiency. IEEE Trans Multimed 10(2): 277-285.